DoW DRONE OTA CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT 29MAY26.docx

DOCX document 33 KB Posted

Attached to
INVITATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF WAR DRONE OTA CONSORTIUM
Solicitation number
W58RGZ-26-2-SN01
Issued by

About this file

This is a Department of War Drone OTA Consortium Agreement establishing governance and operational procedures for an Other Transaction Authority (OTA) acquisition channel under 10 U.S.C. § 4022. The Consortium facilitates rapid prototyping and production of innovative drone systems and warfighter solutions through streamlined solicitations directed to pre-approved vendors. The Government Steering Committee, comprised exclusively of Government employees including an Agreements Officer, Program Manager, and Legal Counsel, governs all activities and retains final authority for award and administration. The Consortium will not be used for advisory and assistance services.

The operational framework employs a competitive three-phase evaluation process: Phase I requires vendors to submit white papers or solution briefs addressing Requests for Whitepapers (RWPs) or Requests for Solutions (RFSs); Phase II involves invited vendors presenting live or virtual demonstrations; and Phase III consists of comprehensive technical and cost proposals from selected vendors. Awards are made as individual Prototype OT Agreements. Submissions not selected for immediate award may be retained in an electronic "Solution Basket" for up to three years for potential future award if funding and requirements align. Vendors must meet mandatory requirements including active UEI and SAM registration, WAWF invoicing registration, responsibility determination, export control compliance (ITAR and EAR), and security clearance requirements (NIST SP 800-171 for CUI). Competition is structured within three pools: Pool 1 (unrestricted actions above $15M), Pool 2 (small business set-asides for actions at or under $15M), and Pool 3 (Non-Traditional Defense Contractors). Authorized customers include DoW agencies, U.S. Federal Agencies, Foreign Partner Nations through DSCA, and other authorized U.S. Government activities. Data rights are negotiated project-by-project, with the Government generally seeking Government Purpose Rights while remaining open to limited or specially negotiated rights.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
DoW DRONE OTA CONSORTIUM APPLICATION FORM 29MAY26.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF WAR DRONE OTA CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT

I: NAME AND AUTHORITY

Section 1.1 Name: The name of this organization shall be the Department of War Drone Other Transaction Authority (OTA) Consortium, hereinafter referred to as the "Consortium."

Section 1.2 Authority: The Consortium is established under the authority of 10 U.S.C. § 4022 to facilitate the rapid prototyping of innovative warfighter solutions as well as the production of successful prototypes for fielding.

Section 1.3 Purpose: To provide a streamlined acquisition channel between the Government and industry/academia, allowing for the rapid solicitation, evaluation, and award of Prototype and Production OTAs. This Consortium shall not be utilized for the acquisition of advisory and assistance services.

II: GOVERNANCE (GOVERNMENT STEERING COMMITTEE)

Section 2.1 Government Steering Committee (GSC): The Consortium shall be governed by a GSC comprised exclusively of Government employees.

Section 2.2 Roles of the GSC:

· Agreements Officer (AO): Final authority for the award and administration of all OT Agreements.

· Program Manager (PM): Responsible for the technical direction and defining Areas of Interest (AOIs) or Statement of Needs (SON).

· Legal Counsel: Ensures all activities comply with federal law and Department of War (DoW) regulations.

Section 2.3 Advisory Roles: The GSC may, at its discretion, utilize Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA) Contractors and Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDC) to provide non-binding technical recommendations and administrative assistance. The vendor understands that the Government may share proprietary company information with SETA Contractors and FFRDC for technical assistance and administrative purposes only.

III: DEFINITIONS

Term
Definition
Vendor
Those entities accepted for limited participation in the Consortium. Participation for vendors is limited to the submission of responses to requests for whitepapers/solutions released by the GSC.
Area of Interest
Broadly defined topic, technical domain, or operational problem set published by the Government to solicit innovative solutions from industry.
Statement of Need
A foundational document that formally establishes the operational requirement, capability gap, or mission-essential problem that must be resolved.
Request for Whitepapers (RWP) / Request for Solutions (RFS)
A streamlined, initial solicitation seeking high-level concepts to solve a Government capability gap. A white paper/solution submission may consist of short narrative documents, presentation slide decks, solution briefs, or video/oral pitches, as specified by the individual solicitation, designed to facilitate rapid evaluation prior to requesting a full technical and cost proposal.
SETA Contractors
Non-Government advisors bound by non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) with the Government who are employed by contractors who may not participate in the Consortium as vendors.
Cost Sharing Agreement
An arrangement where the Vendor receives no fee and is reimbursed only for an agreed-upon portion of its allowable cost. It may be used when the Vendor agrees to absorb a portion of the cost in the expectation of substantial compensation for commercial or technological benefits.

IV: OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

Section 4.1 Solicitation Method: The Government will post RFW/RFSs to the Consortium portal. This serves as the "Competitive Procedure" required by statute.

Section 4.2 Phases Overview for Innovative Warfighter Solutions:

The competitive process for evaluating solutions submitted in response to an RFW/RFS may, at the Government’s discretion, consist of up to three (3) distinct phases:

Phase
Title
Description
Phase I
White Paper / Solution Brief
Vendors submit a brief addressing the RFW/RFS. Submissions are evaluated for technical merit, schedule viability, and overall mission relevance.
Phase II
Pitch / Live Demonstration
Invited Vendors provide a virtual or live demonstration of their technology. The Government reserves the right to record all presentations and demonstrations for evaluation purposes.
Phase III
Full Prototype Proposal
Invited Vendors submit a comprehensive technical and cost proposal. Final awards are subject to funding availability and successful negotiations.

Section 4.3 The "Solution Basket":

· Submissions not selected for immediate award may be placed in the Electronic Basket for up to three (3) years.

· The Government may "pull" a solution from the basket and initiate an award if funding and requirements align.

Section 4.4 Award Instrument: Awards will be made as a Prototype OT Agreement between the Government and the individual Vendor.

V: VENDOR ACCEPTANCE

Section 5.1 Security: Vendors must comply with all security requirements outlined in specific AOIs, including the protection of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and adherence to NIST SP 800-171.

Section 5.2 Export Control: All vendors must strictly adhere to International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and Export Administration Regulations. Failure to maintain a valid DD Form 2345 is grounds for immediate removal from the Consortium.

Section 5.3 Non-Traditional Participation: If applicable, vendors are encouraged to identify as Non-Traditional Defense Contractors (NDCs) to fulfill the statutory requirements of 10 U.S.C. § 4022 regarding cost-sharing exceptions.

Section 5.4 Application: Prospective vendors must submit a Vendor Application and a signed Consortium Vendor Agreement (CVA) via the Government portal. The GSC serves as the approving authority for all vendor requests.

VI: DATA RIGHTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Section 6.1 Negotiation: Data rights will be negotiated on a project-by-project basis or defined as a requirement in the RFW/RFS. The Government generally seeks "Government Purpose Rights" for prototypes but remains open to "Limited" or "Specially Negotiated Rights" to encourage commercial participation.

VII: AMENDMENTS AND TERMINATION

Section 7.1 Amendments: The Government reserves the right to amend these Bylaws at any time to align with mission requirements or legislative changes. Vendors will be notified of changes via the portal.

Section 7.2 Termination: The Government may terminate a vendor’s participation for cause (e.g., security violation) or convenience. Additionally, if a Vendor fails to submit any whitepaper responses within a consecutive twelve (12) month period, the Government reserves the right to terminate their participation for inactivity. The Consortium itself may be dissolved at the discretion of the Government.

VIII: AUTHORIZED CUSTOMERS

During the term of this framework, the Government reserves the right to add or delete authorized ordering customers. Current authorized customers include:

Customer Category
Description / Examples
DoW Agencies
Military Services and other Department of War agencies.
U.S. Federal Agencies
Other authorized U.S. Government agencies and federally controlled activities.
Foreign Partner Nations
Partner nations executing purchases via the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA), or other agreements.
U.S. Agencies / Activities
Other authorized U.S. Government agencies (federal, state, and local) and activities

IX: COMPETITION POOLS

To maximize industrial base participation and comply with 10 U.S.C. § 4022 statutory guidelines, actions will be competed within designated pools:

Pool
Designation
Description & Thresholds
Pool 1
Unrestricted / Full & Open
Actions valued above $15M. Competed without consideration for small business set-asides (SBSA).
Pool 2
Small Business Set-Aside
Actions valued at or under $15M may be set-aside for exclusive small business competition, as determined by the Government.
Pool 3
Non-Traditional Defense Contractors (NDC)
Dedicated pool for NDCs to satisfy statutory requirements and promote commercial technology transition.

X: AWARD ELIGIBILITY AND REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS

In order to receive an award under this Consortium framework, the following mandatory requirements must be met:

Requirement
Detail
UEI & SAM Registration
Vendors shall have a Unique Entity Identification (UEI) number and must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to receiving an instrument. Vendors must maintain active registration throughout the period of performance and during any follow-on awards.
Government Invoicing
Vendors shall register in the prescribed Government invoicing system: Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) (https://wawf.eb.mil/).
Business Size Status
Vendors shall represent their small business size and socio-economic status as required in the solicitation.
Responsibility & Debarment
Vendors must be determined responsible by the AO. Vendors must not be suspended, debarred, or prohibited by Presidential Executive Order/law from receiving an award.
Conflicts of Interest
Any actual or potential Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) shall be identified to the AO prior to award.
Export Controls
Vendors shall comply strictly with the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. § 2751-2794), International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 C.F.R. § 120 et seq.), and the Department of Commerce Export Regulation (15 CFR § 730-774).

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .