Q A - DOL121RP21406 - 04-30-2012.pdf
PDF 7 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Medical Second Opinion - National (DC) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DOL121RP21406
About this file
Questions and Answers 01 - DOL121RP21406 - Medical Second Opinion Washington DC
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Small Business Subcontracting Plan Instructions.doc | DOC document | |
| Subcontracting Plan Summary Sheet.doc | DOC document | |
| Q A - 0002 - DOL121RP21406 - 05-09-2012.pdf | ||
| DOL121RP21406-0001 - Medical Second Opinion- Washington DC.pdf | ||
| DOL121RP21406 _2_ Medical Second Opinion- Washington DC.pdf | ||
| DOL121RP21406 - PastPerformanceQuestionnaire.doc | DOC document | |
| Synopsis_-_Medical_Second_Opinion_Washington DC | — |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation Number: DOL121RP21406 Medical Second Opinion and Medical Examination Services, Washington, D.C.)
Question and Answers April 30, 2012
Q&A RFP Section Page Number
Questions /Comments
Q - 01 Attachments Sections L and M
Is the offeror permitted to submit additional Attachments (other than resumes and copies of state license/certification) in order to further illustrate its technical capabilities?
A - 01 Please follow the required criteria in the solicitation.
Q - 02 Copies of State
License/Certification Sections L and M
As a component of documentation of the experience and qualifications of the offeror’s physician/specialists, proof of licensure if required.
Rather than a copy of a paper license, which consultants may not retain and keep current, may we include as an Attachment data from the AMA Master File database that provides in a consistent format, verified and up to date primary source verification of state licensure, as well as other required information contained in this database?
A - 02 Please follow required criteria and documents in the solicitation.
Q - 03 Provider Coverage Overlap
Sections L & M
The solicitation mentions the need to show provider coverage in MSAs but then list two Metropolitan Divisions. The Washington, DC MSA and Metropolitan Division are largely one in the same but they have been listed as separate need areas.
The majority of the population residing in the Bethesda-Frederick-Rockville, MD Metropolitan Division live within 20 miles of Washington, DC so there is considerable overlap. What is the intended understanding and requirement of the provider needs given this overlap? Would it be sufficient to demonstrate provider coverage for the two listed MSAs and delete reference to Metropolitan Divisions?
A - 03 Please refer to website link under page 75 for definitions. With regard to MSA coverage, please refer to the solicitation Section L & M.
Q - 04 Redacted Component Section L May we confine the redacted component of the proposal to Volume I?
A - 04 Yes, redacted copy applies to Volume 1, Technical Capability.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .