RFI - Responses to Questions.doc
DOC document 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AIRCRAFT & MAINTENANCE/LOGISTICS SUPPORT
- Solicitation number
- DJMS-12-JPT-R-0165
About this file
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DRAFT STATEMENT OF WORK ATTACHMENTS.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AIRCRAFT & MAINTENANCE/LOGISTICS SUPPORT
DJMS-12-JPT-R-0165/0166 – RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS
A. The following responses are provided to questions submitted by industry:
QUESTION #1: RFI/SSN - The notice mentions landing gear at “half-life (5,000 cycles remaining).” Are we correct in assuming this refers to the engines, and landing gear will require a minimum of 5 years remaining life?
RESPONSE: The Statement of Work, Section III, Paragraph B., Item 13(b) requires that all landing gear be at “mid-life.” “Mid-life” for the purposes of this requirement is defined in the Statement of Work, Section III, Paragraph B., Item 13. As an example; a 737-400 aircraft under an MSG-3 maintenance program, mid-life landing gear is considered as landing gear with a minimum of five (5) years or 10,500 cycles remaining life. The Statement of Work, Section III, Paragraph B., Item 13(a) will be amended to read: “Engines offered must have a minimum of 5,000 cycles remaining prior to any scheduled shop visit (scheduled off-wing maintenance). Any recurring inspections must be identified. At time of delivery, engines must be enrolled in a “Power-by-the-Hour” maintenance program.”
QUESTION #2: Draft SOW (Page 3, Section III, B13) - If the aircraft requirement for “39,000 TCSN” were expanded to 42,000 TCSN, there would be a significantly larger sample of available aircraft without a substantial decrease in expected service life. Would USMS consider increasing the allowable TCSN number?
RESPONSE: The Statement of Work, Section III., Paragraph B., Item 11., will be amended to read; ”Aircraft must not have accumulated more than 42,000 total cycles since new (TCSN).”
QUESTION #3(A): RFI/SSN; Draft SOW (Page 3, Section III, B13) - We understand the definition of Mid-Life as it applies to Landing Gear, but are unfamiliar with the term as it applies to:
(a) “all engine life limited components at mid-Life, with Engines on a current and maintained power by the hour maintenance program.” Will you further specify what your hour limitations for each life-limited engine component are?
RESPONSE: See response to Question #1.
QUESTION #3(B): RFI/SSN; Draft SOW (Page 3, Section III, B13) - We understand the definition of Mid-Life as it applies to Landing Gear, but are unfamiliar with the term as it applies to:
(b) Thrust Reversers (TR) and APUs—our experience is that these components are “on-condition” replacements, rather than life limited. Would you provide additional direction?
RESPONSE: The Statement of Work, Section III., Paragraph B., Item 13(c)., will be amended to read; ” Reserved.” The previously identified requirement for the thrust reversers to be mid-life will be deleted. The Statement of Work, Section III., Paragraph B., Item 13(d) will be amended to read; ”Life limited components of the auxiliary power unit (APU), to include, but not limited to, the turbine disc must be at mid-life. At time of delivery, APUs must be enrolled in a “Power-by-the-Hour” maintenance program.”
QUESTION #4: Draft SOW (Page 4, Section III, C 7) - Are we correct in assuming the “ CFM56-3C1 engines without de-rate” phrase, means you want engines rated at a minimum of 23,500#?
RESPONSE: Yes, you are correct.
QUESTION #5 - Draft SOW (Page 10, Section IV, G) - Are we correct in assuming this paragraph’s MSG-3 compliance requirements are applicable at time of delivery of the aircraft?
RESPONSE: Yes, you are correct.
QUESTION #6 - RFI/SSN; Draft SOW (Page 20, Section X, Deliverables) - The RFI/SSN “Aircraft Requirements” requires a “…fresh heavy check (D Check or equivalent) and no calendar maintenance or inspection events due the first 12 months;” and the Draft SOW “Deliverables” tables indicates the aircraft will be delivered “4-weeks after contract award.” This presents a timing challenge, as a 737 D-check can take up to 8 weeks.
Would USMS consider amending the delivery requirement to 10-weeks after contract award?
RESPONSE: Yes, JPATS will amend the delivery requirement to 10-weeks after contract award.
B. Capabilities packages, Information and/or Feedback shall be submitted (via e-mail) to the POC listed below not later than 12:00 pm (noon) EST, June 19, 2012. POC: Arlene Dee Carlson, Contracting Officer, USMS/JPATS, e-mail address: Arlene.carlson@usdoj.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .