4._Evaluation_Factors_for_Award_2_pgs.pdf

PDF 184 KB Posted

Attached to
Towing, Storage, Maintenance and Disposal of seized/forfeited vehicles for the Northern District of California
Solicitation number
DJM-14-A44-Q-0012
Issued by

About this file

Evaluation Factors for Award

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
7._SOW_NCA_10_pgs.pdf PDF
Contractor_Invoice_w._SOC_1_pg_w_Small_business_stmt.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
1._1449__continuation_2_pgs..pdf PDF
Past_Performance_Data_Worksheet.docx DOCX document
STO(_USM-624_06-2012)..pdf PDF
DJM-14-A44-Q-0012.pdf PDF
Pricing_Schedule_NCA.xls XLS spreadsheet
2._Additional_Clauses_4_pgs.pdf PDF
TOW__TICKET..pdf PDF
Offeror_Info_Page.doc DOC document
3._Instructions_to_Offerors_-_Written_Proposals_3_pgs.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

(Attachment # 4)

REQUEST FOR QUOTE

VEHICLE TOWING, STORAGE, MAINTENANCE & DISPOSAL SERVICES

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOLICITATION NO.: DJM-14-A44-Q-0012

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. EVALUATION PROCESS

The contract will be awarded to the responsible company whose proposal conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, based on the evaluation of Technical Capability, Past Performance, and Price.

Technical and past performances, when combined, are approximately equal to cost or price.

2. TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

(a) Technical Capability will be presented to the Government by means of a Written Proposal and via the Government’s observations at a site visit. The specific technical evaluation sub-factors, which must be addressed in the Written Proposal, are set forth below. The responses to each section of Technical Capability must contain an adequate description of the services being offered in sufficient detail for the Technical Evaluation Board (TEB) to determine that your company can meet the requirements of the solicitation.

(b) The Technical Capability factors and sub-factors below will be used by the Technical Evaluation Board (TEB) to comparatively evaluate each company. All responses must be presented to the

TEB in the Written Proposal, and the current or proposed storage facilities must be available for the TEB members to conduct a Site Inspection.

(1) FACILITY, STAFFING, AND SECURITY

(i) Your firm’s current or proposed storage facilities meet the requirements of the SOW.

(ii) Your workforce (including sub-lets), will meet the requirements of the SOW.

(iii) Physical Security Plan in place at the indoor and outdoor storage facilities to include a proposed schematic for storage of indoor assets.

(2) TOWING

(i) Towing fleet and other equipment available to handle all requirements of the

SOW.

(ii) Towing process upon receipt of the STO.

(3) INITIAL INTAKE, STORAGE, AND MAINTENANCE

(i) Initial intake of a vehicle.

(ii) Key control system to be used.

(iii) Contents of a case file and how it will be established and maintained.

(iv) Maintenance services to be provided, controlled, and documented.

(v) Simple hidden compartments to be repaired or removed. Complex hidden compartments to be repaired or removed.

(Attachment # 4)

REQUEST FOR QUOTE

VEHICLE TOWING, STORAGE, MAINTENANCE & DISPOSAL SERVICES

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOLICITATION NO.: DJM-14-A44-Q-0012

(4) DISPOSAL

(i) Advertising and marketing methods.

(ii) Entire live auction process from preview day through the USMS receipt of sale proceeds and paperwork (security, registration and documentation, etc.).

(iii) Entire online auction process from preview day through the USMS receipt of sale proceeds and paperwork (security, registration and documentation, etc.).

3. PAST PERFORMANCE

(a) In investigating an offeror’s performance, the Government may consider the information provided by the Contractor as well as information obtained from other sources, including past and present customers and their employees; other federal government agencies (including National Institutes of Health Contractor Performance System), state and local government agencies;

consumer protection organizations and better business bureaus; former subcontractors; and others who may have pertinent information.

(b) The offeror is required to provide a completed worksheet “Past Performance Data Worksheet”

(Attachment #6) for three (3) similar and relevant Federal Government or Commercial contracts worked on within the last three (3) years.

(c) In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance, and will receive a neutral rating.

4. PRICE

Each price quote will be evaluated for reasonableness. Price reasonableness is a comparison of the proposed price with the prices proposed by other offerors, the Government’s estimate, current prices for the same or similar services, current market conditions, as well as other relevant measures.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .