Past Performance Questionnaire TXS.doc

DOC document 42 KB Posted

Attached to
Private Counsel Debt Collection - Texas Southern District
Solicitation number
DJJB-11-RFP-0728
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire (see Section L for instructions)

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 001 TXS.doc DOC document
TXS RFP Cover Letter.doc DOC document
DJJB-11-RFP-0728.doc DOC document
Standard Form 33.pdf PDF
Proposal Template TXS.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

U.S. Department of Justice

Procurement Services Staff

Private Counsel Debt Collection -- Past Performance Questionnaire

Solicitation No. DJJB-11-RFP-0728

Email or Fax Completed Forms to: Melissa.J.Kerns@usdoj.gov or Facsimile (202) 307-1933 U.S. Department of Justice

Procurement Services Staff

Private Counsel Debt Collection -- Past Performance Questionnaire

Solicitation No. DJJB-11-RFP-0728

Email or Fax Completed Forms to: Melissa.J.Kerns@usdoj.gov or Facsimile (202) 307-1933

Section 1: Identification of Law Practice Being Rated (Ratee)

Name:

Address:

POC Name, Title, Phone and Email:

Section 2: Identification of Client Reference (Rater)

Name:

Address:

POC Name, Title, Phone and Email:

Signature:

Date:

Section 3: Description of Service(s)

What Type of Legal Services Did Ratee Provide Your Business?

When and How Long Have You Done Business with Ratee?

Section 4: Performance Ratings
Rating (Circle One)

Quality of Service(s) -- Comments:

Poor Average

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Timeliness of Performance--Comments:

Poor

Average

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Business Relations--Comments:

Poor

Average

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Competitiveness of Prices--Comments:

Poor

Average

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Adjectival Rating Scheme:

Poor = failed to complete the work and/or work did not satisfy expectations.

Average = met some expectations but not in all areas.

Good = met all expectations in all areas.

Very good = met all expectations and exceeded in one or more areas.

Excellent = exceeded expectations in all areas

PAGE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .