AMENDMENT_0001_SOLICITATION_DJJ-13-R-EOA87-0108_.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITAT10Nノ MODIFICAT10N OF CONTRACT

6 1SSuEO BY

Department of」 ustioe

Execulve OfFoe for u S

600 E Street,N W Suite

Washington,DC 20530

See Block 6

O NAME AND A00RESS OF CONTRACTOR ρあ `″で `4ω“

77″ Sl● ″α″ Z47'(:o●ゥ

Prospective Quoters D」 J‐ 13‐ R‐EOA87-0108

9B DATED`夕 乃ヮ′7F1/′ ″

,OA M001FiCAT10N OF CONTRACT10RDER N0

100 DATED(5“ り′7●M′″

図 The aboVe numbe“ soliclaton t anended as sd btt m tem 14 The hourand dae specFedお「Юce口 d Ores

にetended

図 にno extended orers must acknowiedOe receipt ofい s amendment plo「 tO the hourand date specned n the solcitatlon oras amended by one olthe rolowinO mebodSi

(a)By∞m口 elng items e and 15,and retumm。 1 ∞pos d the amendment(b)By aCknttedO● 9 rece pt oftns anendment on each copy Of he orersubmtte● or

(C)By Separate le“ r orte eOに m wh chindudos a relerence o the solctalon and amendment numbers FAILURE OF YOuR ACKNOVVLEDGMENT TO BE RECE,VED ATTHC PLACE Dビ S10NATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PR10R TO THE HOuR ANO DATE SPCCIFIED MAY RESULTIN REuECT10N OF YOUR OFFER f by virtue orth s amendment you desire to change an orer already submitted,such change may be made by telo9rem o「 ietter prc vided each teleOram orietter makes relerence to the so iatatiOn and this amendment and is received pr orto the opening hour and date specFed

12 ACCOUNTING ANO APPROPRIATION OATA//roq!,."d1

Attorneys

B THE ABOVE NuMBビ RED CONTRACT70RDERlS MODlFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES`“h“ `力 α″♂"″ り́″g中でマタηψ商!=0″ ″″ιr● l

SET FORTHINITEM 14 PURSuANT TO THC AUTHORITY OF FAR 43`0■ b)

AUTHORITY OF

D - OTHER (Sp.ctfy type of nod'li.otion otu1

E MPORTANIConndOr□ にnd.図 にreq面闘 b● gn tts documen a“ は um copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENOMENT/MOOIFICATION (Oryaai.ed b! UCF ectbn heorlincs. including soli.itdtton/contruct slbJe.t ndtterwhere fe6ibte.)

The purpose of this amendment is to incoporate the information on pages 2-3 ofthis amendment to Section g.O Evaluation Factors in the Scope of Work.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

13 THiSITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MOD FICAT10NS OF CONTRACTS′ ORDERS.

ITMODFIESTHECONTRACWORDERNO ASDESCRIBEDINITEM 14

THlS CHANGE ORDeRIS ISSuED PURSuANT TO:`陸 ″αレ′力。77fll THE CHANOES SET FORTH!NlTEM 14 ARE MADElN THE CONTRACT

ORDeR NO INITEM 10A

16A NAME ANO TITLE OF

16C DA

と(Ssnature ofpe*on athotizetl to risn)

PREViOuS EDIT10N υNuSABLE

Thsfom was eeclR nc81y pttutt by Elle Federa Foms nc 83)

Pre叡

"bed by GSAFAR(43 CFR)53243

Except as provided herein alllerms and condiljons of the documenl referenced in ltem 9Ao|l0A, as herelofore changed, rem.ins unchanged and in futt force and effect

Yu」 in Kim′ Contraclng OfFcer

動テ3

Amendment 0001 to Solicitation DJJ-I3-R-EOA87-0108

Adjectival Ratings for Technical Requirements

Adjectival Ratings for Past Performance

Reference past performance questions:

(l) Was the offeror capable, efficient and effective?

(2) Did the offeror's performance conform to the terms and conditions of its contract?

(3) Was the offeror reasonable and cooperative during the performance?

(4) Was the offeror committed to customer satisfaction?

Adjectival Description

Technically Acceptable

The approach presented by the quoter meets the basic minimum requirements of the RFQ, with no apparent weaknesses.

Technically Unacceptable

The quote is not adequately responsive or does not address the specific factor(s) (or sub factor(s)). The response is incomplete, vague, incompatible, incomprehensible or incorrect as to be technically unacceptable. The assignment of a rating within the bounds of "technically unacceptable" indicates that the evaluator feels that mandatory corrective action would be required to prevent significant deficiencies from affecting the overall project.

Adjectival Description

Acceptable

References could be reached. References indicate the quoter is capable, efficient and effective, conformed to the terms and conditions of its contract, reasonable and cooperative during performance and were committed to customer satisfaction. An assigned rating within "Acceptable" indicates that the references provided positive feedback to the past performance questions and essentially had no negative comments (or had negative comments that were minor in nature) to indicate low risk of non-perforrnance.

Unacceptable

References could not be reached. References did not confirm that the quoter is capable, efficient and effective, conformed to the terms and conditions of its contract, reasonable and cooperative during performance and were committed to customer satisfaction. An assigned rating within "Unacceptable" indicates that the references did not provide positive feedback to the past performance questions and had negative comments (that were not minor in nature) to indicate a mid to high risk of non-perforrnance.

Page 2 of3

Neutral

The quoter does not have relevant past performance (commercial or federal/state Government contracts) history within the last three years. A neutral evaluation means any assessment that neither rewards nor firms without relevant performance history.

Page 3 of3