DHSI Scoring Guidance.pdf
PDF 123 KB Posted
- Opportunity number
- ED-GRANTS-122719-001
- Issued by
-
Department of Education
About this file
Scoring Guidance for Grant Reviewers
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Suggested Scoring Guidance
• A fully-developed response demonstrates a clear understanding of the criterion requirements. The response not only addresses the factor, but also comprehensively demonstrates alignment between what is proposed, how it will be carried out, and the subsequent impact.
• A well-developed response demonstrates a clear understanding of the criterion requirements. The response addresses the factor and demonstrates a basic alignment between what is proposed and how it will be carried out and the subsequent impact.
• An adequate response demonstrates a partial understanding of the criterion requirements. The response may address the factor, but provides inadequate, and at times, inconsistent information with regard to what is proposed, how it will be carried out, and the subsequent impact.
• A poorly-developed response demonstrates minimal understanding of the criterion requirements. The response does not address the factor, and demonstrates poor alignment between what is proposed, how it will be carried out, and the subsequent impact.
• A zero-point response means that the criterion requirements were not addressed anywhere in the application.
File details come from the government source that posted it.