DCC Request for Information (RFI).pdf

PDF 125 KB Posted

Attached to
DOL/BLS - Data Collection Activities (CES, JOLTS, EDI, ORS)
Solicitation number
OAA-24-00294
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Request for Information (RFI) issued by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to gather input from industry on best practices and approaches to perform data collection activities for the Current Employment Statistics (CES) and Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) programs, as well as the Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Center operations.

The RFI provides background on the BLS data collection programs, including the scope, sample sizes, and data collection methods. It outlines several key challenges and opportunities, such as declining response rates, the introduction of telework, increased web-based data collection, and the need to review labor categories and performance incentives. BLS is specifically requesting feedback on the contract structure, performance incentives, and telework flexibilities. The goal is to use the industry input to develop a solicitation that aligns with current business practices and increases the likelihood of successful performance. Responses are due by August 1, 2024.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment B - ORS PWS.pdf PDF
Attachment C - CES PWS.pdf PDF
Attachment D - JOLTS PWS.pdf PDF
Attachment A - EDI PWS.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

THIS ANNOUNCEMENT IS NOT A NOTICE OF SOLICITATION ISSUANCE. THIS IS A

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY.

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is conducting market research to receive input from the commercial marketplace regarding best practices and approaches to perform data collection activities for the Current Employment Statistics (CES) and Job Openings and Labor Turnover

Survey (JOLTS) programs and the Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Center operations. Any information received from this request may be used in developing a viable solicitation that will best communicate the Government’s requirements to industry while incorporating ideas from the commercial marketplace to increase the likelihood of successful performance. Response to this

Request for Information (RFI) is strictly voluntary and will not affect any firm’s ability to submit an offer if, or when, a solicitation is released. The requested information is for planning purposes only and does NOT constitute a commitment, implied or otherwise, that a procurement action will be issued. No entitlement to payment by the Government of direct or indirect costs or charges will arise because of the submission of information in response to this RFI. The

Government shall not be liable for or suffer any consequential damages for any improperly identified proprietary information. Proprietary information will be safeguarded in accordance with the applicable Government regulations.

Vendor Submission Deadline

The deadline for submitting vendor feedback is: 08/01/2024 at 5:00pm ET

I. Introduction

This is an RFI per FAR 15.201(c) for market research purposes. The Bureau of Labor

Statistics has relied on the commercial marketplace for data collection activities for the CES and JOLTS programs and EDI Center operations, with distinct contracts for each program.

BLS maintains data collection centers in Atlanta, GA; Dallas, TX; Fort Walton Beach, FL;

and Kansas City, MO; and a help desk in Washington, DC (Note: the CES help desk will relocate to the new BLS campus in Suitland, MD in 2025). BLS maintains data collection centers for JOLTS in Atlanta, GA, and Kansas City, MO. BLS maintains the EDI Center in

Chicago, IL. For the CES and JOLTS contracts, the vendor staffs these data collection centers with interviewers, who collect data and enter it into the BLS proprietary web-based computer-assisted telephone instrument, TopCATIWeb. For the EDI Center, the vendor staffs the center with analysts and programmers who analyze and process data using BLS proprietary software. For all contracts, the vendor is responsible for training and managing the interviewer, analyst, and programmer staff and ensuring quality control.

II. Background

a. CES

BLS collects data each month on employment, hours, and earnings from a sample of nonfarm establishments through the CES program. The CES survey includes about

122,000 businesses and government agencies, which cover approximately 666,000 individual worksites drawn from a sampling frame of Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax accounts covering roughly 11 million establishments. The active CES sample includes approximately one-third of all nonfarm payroll employees in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. From these data, several employment, hours, and earnings series in considerable industry and geographic detail are prepared and published each month.

b. JOLTS

BLS collects data each month on employment, job openings, hires, and separations from a sample of nonfarm establishments through the JOLTS program. The survey includes about 21,000 business and government agency worksites drawn from a sampling frame of approximately 11.3 million private and government establishments. The JOLTS sample includes establishments located in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

c. EDI Center

The EDI Center collects employment, hours, earnings, and wage information from large, multiple-establishment companies with locations in multiple states. These raw data are transmitted from firms to the EDI Center as electronic files. The EDI Center staff reviews, edits, and then transmits processed data to either the states or federal government. The EDI Center collects data for two Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) programs, Current Employment Statistics (CES) and Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW).

d. Challenges and opportunities

1. Declining response rates: BLS establishment surveys have been suffering from decreasing unit response rates over the past ten years, according to data published by the BLS Office of Survey Methodology and Research

(https://www.bls.gov/osmr/response-rates/#chart2a) BLS data collection activities have been further impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which has affected some respondents’ availability, ability, or willingness to provide data to BLS. BLS and vendors must strive to increase response rates in the current environment and ensure that acceptable quality levels are met.

2. Introduction of telework: The data collection activities for CES and JOLTS have historically been performed 100% on-site, but the pandemic led to BLS instituting telework privileges to contractor staff to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. The introduction of telework has created management challenges given the inherent differences in monitoring performance for individuals working remotely while ensuring data quality and confidentiality. That said, to consistently recruit https://www.bls.gov/osmr/response-rates/#chart2a successful interviewers, BLS intends to continue allowing telework flexibilities for proficient interviewers.

3. Web collection: BLS introduced an option for reliable respondents to submit data to CES via the web, in a process described internally as “Flex reporting.”

Approximately 50 % of data collected by CES Data Collection Centers now comes from Flex reporting. Similarly, web collection comprises 60% of JOLTS’s monthly data submissions. This frees up time for interviewers to work on address refinement and enrollment activities, as well as on more complex cases.

4. Labor categories. The current contract for data collection activities for CES and

JOLTS is a hybrid firm-fixed-price and labor hours. The firm-fixed-price component covers supervision, management, travel, and training activities. The labor hours component covers the individual interviewers’ hourly rates of performed labor. There are currently three categories of interviewers: Interviewer

1, Interviewer 2, and Lead Interviewer. These positions are paid hourly rates subject to the McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act (SCA). BLS seeks to ensure that the contract’s labor categories accurately reflect the nature of the work.

5. Performance incentives: The contract does not currently have incentives or disincentives built in, but the labor hours structure provides an unintentional incentive for the contractor to retain consistent poor performers. BLS is considering the introduction of incentives based on acceptable quality levels being met or exceeded while ensuring that such incentives do not compromise data integrity.

III. Information Requested

The most recent versions of the Performance Work Statements are included in

Attachment C (CES), Attachment J (JOLTS), and Attachment E (EDI). BLS welcomes comments from the commercial marketplace about any elements contained therein that they believe may jeopardize the successful performance of the contract and propose suggestions that increase the likelihood of success.

BLS is requesting feedback on three specific topics.

a. Contract structure and performance incentives

The current contract has a hybrid firm-fixed-price and labor hours structure. The firm-fixed-price component covers management, supervision, training, and travel.

The labor hours component covers the hourly rates of the interviewers.

For CES and JOLTS, wage determinations for the interviewers under the SCA are currently based on the Survey Worker category for Interviewer 1 positions and

Computer Operator II category for the Interviewer 2 positions, while the Interviewer

3 hourly rates are based on a premium paid over the Interviewer 2 rates.

For the EDI Center, wage determinations for the analysts under the SCA are currently based on the Computer Operator I category for the Analyst 1 positions, and Computer

Operator II category for Analyst 2 positions. The Programmer 1 and Programmer 2 rates are not covered by the SCA.

BLS specifically would like to know how many, and which labor categories in the commercial marketplace should be included in the performance work statement.

Furthermore, would the contractor be able to more successfully perform the work given the increase in web collection and the flexibilities afforded under a firm-fixed-price contract?

Additionally, which incentives and penalties should be included in the contract?

Specifically, BLS is considering performance incentives if the acceptable quality levels are exceeded, and penalties if the contractor is not fully staffed or far below the acceptable quality levels. How can BLS introduce incentives to reward successful performance without compromising data integrity? How can BLS introduce penalties without discouraging potential vendors from competing for the work or retaining poor consistent performers?

b. Telework flexibilities

BLS introduced telework flexibilities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure continuity of operations. The current vendor has faced recruiting challenges, as candidates indicate a strong preference for full-time telework positions. BLS requires that recent hires and poor performers report to work on-site for training, therefore it is unlikely that these positions will be true full-time telework positions.

Furthermore, candidates are required to be within commuting distance of their respective data collection centers.

BLS understands that maintaining telework flexibilities will likely be necessary to recruit the best-qualified candidates. BLS would like vendors to describe their approach to telework, and what measures they would take to ensure performance requirements and data confidentiality needs are met.

IV. Responses

BLS thanks members of the commercial marketplace for their insight. This collaboration will help BLS design a performance work statement that is more aligned with current business practices and increases the likelihood of success.

The deadline for submitting responses is: 08/01/2024 at 5:00pm ET

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .