DAR_400_DRAFT_ SOW_16May2024.pdf

USAFE3G-613BK58J4

Data at Rest (DAR)- 400 Obsolescence Resolution

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

11 Apr 2024

Air Force Life Cycle Management Center

E-3G AWACS Division

(AFLCMC/HBS)

USAFE3G-Page 2 of 17

1 Problem Statement

1.1 Scope

1.1.1 The scope of this statement of work (SOW) is to provide an obsolescence resolution for the mission critical E-3G DAR-400 to prevent mission impact. The provided solution will be compliant with current DoD and NSA mandates and be a form, fit, functional, and integrated (F3I) replacement system to replace the current DAR-400 equipment.

1.1.2 In the event of conflicts between the Statement of Work and other project documents, the Statement of Work shall take precedence.

1.2 Background

1.2.1 The USAF E-3G AWACS provides worldwide response to situations requiring immediate and continuous on-scene command, control, and battle management using embedded real-time surveillance to support employment of U.S. and allied combat forces. The E-3G consists of the air vehicle, sensor systems, and computing and communications equipment. The current USAF E-3G operational fleet consists of 16 operational aircraft. The E-3G DAR-400 (part numbers 63-2824652-01 thru -03) is a mission critical asset and is in critical need of obsolescence resolution to prevent mission impact. Since the DAR-400 contains encrypted MCS data, a failure would directly impact operations and data security. General Dynamics Mission Systems (GDMS) has notified that the DAR-400 will not be able to support or upgrade to changing NSA requirements.

1.2.2 The current DAR-400 equipment is installed at the following locations:

Location Part # 63-2824652 -01 -02 -03

Mission Computing System (Seat 6) X X Mission Computing System (Seat 7) X X IPEC (Seat 18) X Deployable Ground System (DGS) Gen 3 X X Mission Support System (MSS) X X PACAF Ground Surveillance Systems (PGSS) X X

2 TASK STATEMENT/REQUIREMENTS

2.1 Engineering Requirements

2.1.1 The Contractor shall perform the engineering and development, to include design, build, testing, integration, and qualification of the DAR Replacement System on the USAF E- 3G aircraft that meets or exceeds all operational requirements.

2.1.2 The Contractor shall provide and have installed operational replacement DAR System for items identified in Table 2.2, along with technical orders and training per the deliverables in Table 2.1.

2.1.3 The Contractor shall provide the remaining kits 90 business days after the conclusion of and concurrence by the Government post initial kits installation, validation/verification of all technical data and approved flight testing per Table 2.2.

USAFE3G-Page 3 of 17

2.1.4 The contractor shall meet or exceed all the follow requirements:

2.1.4.1 The Contractor shall meet all E-3G System set requirements outlined in Specification

888-16001 (See Appendix A)

2.1.4.2 The Contractor shall meet all E-3G Air Vehicle Functional Group Data at Rest requirements outlined in Specification 888-16096 (See Appendix B)

2.1.4.3 The Contractor shall meet all E-3G Ground Support Functional Group Data at Rest requirements outlined in Specification 888-16129 (See Appendix C)

2.1.4.4 The Contractor shall meet all E-3G Mission Computing Functional Group Data at

Rest requirements outlined in Specification 888-16142 (See Appendix D)

2.1.4.5 The Contractor shall meet all E-3G IPEC Functional Group Data at Rest requirements outlined in Specification 888-16927 (See Appendix E)

2.1.4.6 The Contractor shall meet all E-3G Classified (ID Reference) Data at Rest requirements outlined in Specification Classified Data at Rest (DAR) Encryption Requirements (See Appendix F)

2.1.4.7 The Contractor shall select a Data at Rest Encryption Solution, that if using AES encryption, shall utilize AES256 or better for Classified Data at Rest.

2.1.4.8 The Contractor shall design the Data at Rest Encryption Solution to be zeroized by operators via a physical interface within normal physical reach without power present.

2.1.4.9 The Contractor shall design the Data at Encryption Solution Shall include a ruggedized (IAW MIL-STD-810G) solid state storage device to support at a minimum of 1 TB.

2.1.5 The Contractor shall design, develop, and provide a modification and installation kit-drawing packages for replacement DAR System.

2.1.6 The Contractor shall provide engineering drawings to include modification/de-modification instructions, installation, and check-out procedures. (A001 / DI-SESS-

81000F, A002 / DI-DRPR-81242, A003 / DI-IPSC-81488)

2.1.7 The Contractor shall provide a part listing and all necessary hardware and software for all parts, spares, and special tools required for the replacement DAR System to sustain the USAF E-3G Fleet of 16 aircraft.

2.1.8 The Contractor shall utilize the same equipment mounting location and holes to the maximum feasible extent with the new design.

2.1.9 The Contractor shall design a replacement system that ensures installation and checkout work can be accomplished by active-duty military personnel, with a maximum of 25 man-hours. Should the process exceed this time frame, coordination with the SPO is required. The first aircraft installation is a prototype and will be installed by Contractor.

The second aircraft will be installed by USAF with over the shoulder support from the Contractor. Contractor will provide reach back, training and engineering support for remaining aircraft.

2.1.10 The Contractor shall design a replacement system that ensures installation and checkout

USAFE3G-Page 4 of 17 work can be accomplished by military personnel. The first 2 aircraft installations and three (3) ground systems (DGS, PGSS, and MSS) as a solution set will be completed by Contractor and the Contractor will provide reach back, training and engineering support for remaining aircraft.

2.1.11 The Contractor shall provide all 108 installation kits per Table 2.2.

2.1.12 The Contractor shall identify and provide new and updated engineering drawings and technical data for use during Kit proofing installation.

2.1.13 The Contractor shall provide on-site engineering support to Government for kit proofing, installation, checkout of initial DAR replacement system to support testing to include ground and flight. For the second aircraft, installed by USAF, the Contractor shall provide support to perform validation and verification of TCTO. The Contractor shall provide reach-back support for OSS&E and artifacts to complete certification efforts per checklist. The government shall provide the contractor the OSS&E checklist.

2.1.14 The contractor shall conduct a System Requirements Review (SRR); confirm requirements, meet mission needs, have feasible solutions, and are verifiable. (A004 / DI-NDTl-80566A, A005 / DI-NDTl-80603A)

2.1.15 The Contractor shall conduct a Critical Design Review (CDR); confirm that the design meets the requirements and performed prior to test planning. (A004 / DI-NDTl- 80566A, A005 / DI-NDTl-80603A)

2.1.16 The Contractor shall conduct a Test Readiness Review (TRR) and confirm that test article configurations and plans are compatible with planned test events. (A004 / DI- NDTl-80566A, A005 / DI-NDTl-80603A)

2.1.17 The Contractor shall provide updates to all affected modification kit drawings after completion of the kit proofing.

2.1.18 The Contractor shall provide Environment Qualification Test Reports (Mil-Spec or FAA TSO Qualification Reports) necessary to confirm airworthiness compliance, which at minimum shall include : Stress Analysis, Damage Tolerance Analysis, Weight and Balance Analysis, Human Factors Analysis, System Safety Analysis, Explosive atmosphere, EMI/EMC Test Reports, Electrical Load Analysis, Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to Fuel (HERF) Analysis, Co-site Analysis and High Intensity Radio Frequency (HIRF)/Lightning Analysis/Test Reports (MIL-T-5422F NOT 2). Qualification/Test Reports (A006 / DI-MISC-80508B/T)

2.1.19 The Contractor shall provide a TEMPEST analysis of the SIC architecture and installation design in accordance with the following: (A006 / DI-MISC-80508B/T)

2.1.19.1 AFSSI 7702: Emission Security Countermeasures Reviews (Appendix I)

2.1.19.2 E-3G AWACS Security Classification Guide (SCG), 1 Sept 2020.

2.1.19.3 MIL-STD-464A: Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Requirements for Systems

2.1.19.4 NSTISSAM TEMPEST/2-95: RED/BLACK Installation Guidance

2.1.19.5 CNSSAM TEMPEST 01-02: NONSTOP Evaluation Standard

2.1.19.6 D204-10639-1: Electrical and Electronic Wiring Design Methods and Practices, USAFE3G-Page 5 of 17

Boeing document

2.1.19.7 NSTISSAM TEMPEST/1-92: Compromising Emanations Laboratory Test

Requirements, Electromagnetics

2.1.19.8 383-4-195 CR: CCS Certification Report, EAL+4 Evaluation of HSL Secure DVI

KVM Switch, Secure KM Switch and KVM Combiner

2.2 Technical Data Requirements

2.2.1 The Contractor shall develop and deliver Certified Time Compliance Technical Order in accordance with the attached TMCR. (A017 / TM-86-01 Appendix G)

2.2.2 The Contractor shall provide certified source data for TO changes of all affected Technical Orders according to the appropriate format and timeframes identified in the attached TMCR.( A017 / TM-86-01 Appendix G)

2.2.3 The Contractor shall conduct In Process Reviews (IPRs) for each TO/TCTO in accordance with the attached TMCR. (A017 / TM-86-01 Appendix G)

2.2.4 The Contractor shall host a Technical Order Guidance Conference (TOGC) in accordance with the attached TMCR. (A017 / TM-86-01 Appendix G)

2.3 Cybersecurity Requirements

2.3.1 For classified requirements see Appendix E. (provide via SIPR)

2.3.2 The Contractor shall design a Data at Rest Encryption Solution shall be NSA Type 1

Certified for protection of classified data at rest at the Secret Level or Higher.

2.3.3 The Contractor shall ensure that the cryptographic devices are compliant with NSA

Mandates.

2.3.4 The Contractor shall ensure the cybersecurity portions of the overall system design are reflected in related documents, test plans, procedures, and reports.

2.3.5 The Contractor shall use commercially available Cybersecurity (CS) and CS-enabled information technology products that have been successfully evaluated against the USAF Approved Products List (APL), Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) APL, other DoD Service APLs, or National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) APL, wherever possible. The Contractor shall submit unapproved products to the Government for approval.

2.3.6 The Contractor shall implement any applicable DISA Security Technical Implementation Guide (STIGs) and Security Requirements Guide (SRGs), that are applicable to the replacement solution and document IAW CDRL SSAD (A007 / DI-

MISC-80508B)

2.3.7 The Contractor shall update and deliver the following CDRLs if applicable, to support the governments Interim Authority to Test (IATT) and Authorization to Operate (ATO) Processes for affected systems.

2.3.7.1 System Security Architecture Document (SSAD) – Technical Report - Study/Service

(A007 / DI-MISC-80508B/T)

2.3.7.2 Risk Analysis and Hardening Report (RAHR) – Technical Report - Study/Service

USAFE3G-Page 6 of 17

(A008 / DI-MISC-80508B/T)

2.3.7.3 Security Control Traceability Matrix (SCTM) – Technical Report - Study/Service

(A009 / DI-MISC-80508B/T)

2.3.8 The Contractor shall describe the overall philosophy, requirements, approach and implementation to be taken with regard to protecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) for the replacement DAR solution IAW CDRL SSAD. (A007 / DI-

MISC-80508B/T)

2.3.9 The Contractor shall implement the agreed upon Government provided tailored security controls, IAW NIST 800-53 R5 with the categorizations of Confidentiality at High, Integrity at High, and Availability at High with Classified Overlay.

2.3.10 The Contractor shall document and deliver the implementation status details for security controls in the government provided Security Controls Traceability Matrix Template as applicable IAW CDRL SCTM. (A009 / DI-MISC-80508B/T)

2.3.11 If applicable, the Contractor shall conduct a security risk assessment and document the results in a Risk Analysis and Hardening Report (RAHR) for the replacement DAR solution that addresses cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities, likelihood of attacks, existing and planned countermeasures, and decompositions of Government-identified Mission critical functions and document IAW CDRL RAHR. (A008 / DI MISC 80508B/T)

2.3.12 The Contractor shall provide justification and rationale if applicable for any non-compliance of Technical Requirements, Security Controls, DISA STIGs and SRGs

IAW CDRL RAHR. (A008 / DI MISC 80508B/T)

2.3.13 The Contractor shall conduct a critical program information (CPI) analysis of the replacement DAR solution. The Contractor’s CPI analysis shall comply with the CPI definition described in DoDI 5200.39, Critical Program Information (CPI) identification and Protection Within Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) May 28, 2015 (Change 2- Oct 15, 2018) and document IAW CDRL CPI Analysis. (A010 / DI

MISC 80508B/T)

2.3.14 The Contractor shall perform Sanitization Analyses on any new Hardware that stores and/or processes classified information except for NSA Type 1 certified devices. The Contractor’s analysis shall address the following considerations:

2.3.14.1 Sanitization Feasibility

2.3.14.2 Recommended Sanitization Process

2.3.14.3 Part Sparing Methodology

2.3.14.4 Hardware item memory types and respective sanitization requirements, including static random-access memory (SRAM)

2.3.14.5 Threats, including those posed by insiders

2.3.14.6 Classification of passwords

2.3.14.7 Use of batteries to maintain storage of classified data in memory components.

2.3.14.8 Removable memory components contained in hardware items, e.g., Hard-disk drives, USAFE3G-Page 7 of 17 flash (thumb) drives, compact flash cards

2.3.14.9 Visual inspection of system components and determination of volatile and non-volatile memory locations

2.3.14.10 Photographs of system components indicating locations of memory, batteries, wireless devices, removable media

2.3.14.11 Vendor letters of volatility (LOV) and Sanitization Instructions (If Available)

2.3.15 The Contractor shall utilize vendor LOVs solely as a reference and shall to the extent possible independently verify all memory types and data storage locations.

2.3.16 The Contractor shall provide the sanitization procedures to the maximum feasible extent for any new Hardware, except for NSA Type 1 certified devices, IAW the Air Force Manual for Computer Security (COMPUSEC) (AFMAN 17-1301), for Government approval IAW CDRL Sanitization Analysis. (A011 / DI MISC 80508B/T)

2.3.17 The Contractor shall verify and validate internal and external interfaces, and subsystem and component interactions during integration testing. The Contractor shall analyze, and correct issues identified during integration testing.

2.3.18 The Contractor shall procure the components for the replacement DAR System IAW NIST SP 800-161r1 through approved Supply Chain Methods, Sources and guidelines or via NSA approved channels for Type 1 Cryptographic Devices.

2.4 Logistics Requirements

2.4.1 Provisioning. The Contractor shall provide data for and participate in the Provisioning process for Data at Rest (DAR) in accordance with Contract Data Requirement Lists (DD Forms 1423) and the Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS) in the contract. The Contractor shall recommend logical spare/repair parts sufficient to meet operability and supportability objectives.

2.4.2 Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD). PTD will be submitted in a format compatible with the Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) Automated Provisioning System (D220) as required by the IPPS including attachments. Schedule for submitting the PTD shall be in accordance with the CDRLs and the Provisioning Performance Schedule (PPS) (AFMC Form 718) which will be completed at the Provisioning Guidance Conference (PGC). (A012 / DI-SESS-81758A/T)

2.4.3 Engineering Data for Provisioning (EDFP). Schedule and requirements for submitting the EDFP shall be in accordance with the CDRL for EDFP. Order of precedence for EDFP will be in accordance with the IPPS. (A013 / DI-SESS-81874/T)

2.4.4 Provisioning Conferences. The Contractor shall support a PGC hosted by the Prime Provisioning Activity (PPA) at Tinker AFB within 45 days of receipt of the contract by the PPA. The Contractor shall support Spares Provisioning Conference(s) as determined at the PGC.

2.4.5 The Contractor shall provide DAR system parts, spares, and special tools required for sustainment in order to keep the USAF E-3G fleet sustainable for up to 15 years. (A014

/ DI-PSSS-81619A)

USAFE3G-Page 8 of 17

2.4.6 The Contractor shall determine, procure, repair, service, store, receive, and dispose of classified and unclassified recoverable and expendable designated peculiar items/consumables pertaining to DAR.

2.4.6.1 The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of DoD Contract Security Classification Specification DD Form 254 to handle and store classified material.

2.4.6.2 The Contractor shall provide initial DAR spares to Government control.

2.4.6.3 The Contractor shall provide the following for each asset to government:

2.4.6.3.1 Part number

2.4.6.3.2 Source of Supply (SOS)

2.4.6.3.3 Source of Repair (SOR)

2.4.6.3.4 Item Unique Identification (IUID) number

2.4.6.3.5 Asset usage data

2.4.6.3.6 Warranty data

2.4.6.3.7 Cost data

2.4.6.3.8 Special PHS&T requirements

2.4.6.4 The Contractor shall provide key supporting documentation for transactions within two (2) business days upon request. (A015 / DI-ILSS-80483)

2.4.6.5 The Contractor shall deliver components to Tinker AFB, Bldg. 506, DLA Central Receiving for requisitions.

2.4.7 A product's form, fit, function, and interchangeability characteristics and attributes are systematically organized and associated with unique identifiers (i.e. aircraft effectivity codes) in configuration identification. Effective configuration identification applied to the development, verification, production, and operation phases allows the DAR system to meet program objectives.

2.4.7.1 The Contractor shall provide the following:

2.4.7.1.1 Unique identification marking of product/ associated documentation reference point for defining changes, applying corrective actions, and/or investigating anomalies.

2.4.7.1.2 Hardware/ software database by aircraft tail number/ ground system application of actual configuration, based on initial issue during production install and follow-on issue transaction history.

2.4.7.2 The Contractor shall correlate individual product units to warranties and service life obligations.

2.4.7.3 The Contractor shall maintain the authorized configuration database and integrate new configurations into the database. The authorized configuration database will contain all hardware/software/ firmware information (by manufacturer, model

USAFE3G-Page 9 of 17 number, part number, version/ release number, and serial number) approved to operate on a given aircraft and other associated DAR systems.

2.4.8 The Contractor shall provide the data for a Data Management and Collection System compatible with GEIA-STD-00007 or equivalent (such as Power log J).

2.4.8.1 The contractor shall provide the following information to the Government:

2.4.8.1.1 Sl000D

2.4.8.1.2 Technical Order Source Data

2.4.8.1.3 Provisioning Data

2.4.8.1.4 Support Equipment Recommendations Data

2.4.8.2 The Contractor shall provide data for RAM-C improvements as well as DMSMS, and other configuration changes. (A006 / DI-MISC-80508B/T; A016 / DI-MGMT- 81949)

2.4.9 The Contractor shall enter into a workshare agreement, in the form of a Public Private Partnership (PPP), with the 558 SMXS to ensure lowest negative impact integration of all changes to the DAR system.

2.4.9.1 The DAR system is defined by the following:

2.4.9.1.1 System changes are predicted and handled through routine, scheduled insertions of hardware and software into fielded systems.

2.4.9.1.2 Emergency insertions of hardware and software are very infrequent.

2.4.9.1.3 DMS solutions are chosen that minimize total RAM-C impacts.

2.4.9.1.4 Baseline updates are captured in system documentation.

2.4.9.1.5 TO Certification and Verification (C&V) IAW Air Force Technical Manual (TM)

(A017 / TM-86-01)

2.4.9.1.6 Installation of hardware and software are scheduled in conjunction with wing priorities for assets.

2.4.10 The contractor shall develop, update, and implement a Counterfeit Prevention Plan in compliance with DFARS 252.246-7007 using the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) AS5553C, SAE AS6081, IDEA-STD-1010B or similar practices to prevent the inclusion of counterfeit parts or parts with malicious logic. (A018 / DI-MISC-81832)

2.4.11 The contractor shall make a specific reference to those aspects of NISP 800-161, Supply Chain Risk Management Practices for Federal Information Systems and Organizations, that represent the contractor's implemented processes and practices which include a description of how the contractor shall protect the supply chain from exploitation due to the insertion of counterfeits/malware, unauthorized production, tampering, theft, insertion of malicious software and hardware, functionality alteration, and any other elements that would allow adversaries to gain unauthorized access to data, alter data, USAFE3G-Page 10 of 17 interrupt communications, or otherwise disrupt operations. (A019 / DI-MGMT- 82256A)

2.4.12 The contractor shall make specific reference to those aspects of NIST SP 800-53 revision 5, Security and Policy Controls for Information Systems and Organization, that represents the Supply Chain Risk Management (SR) control family. The Counterfeit Prevention Plan shall include a description of the processes for reviewing suppliers and subcontractors and approving ones that meet appropriate counterfeit avoidance criteria.

(A018 / DI-MISC-81832)

2.4.13 The contractor shall require its suppliers and subcontractors to participate in counterfeit prevention activities.

2.4.14 The contractor shall acquire parts using a trusted flow from supplier(s) accredited by the Defense Microelectronics Activity.

2.4.15 The contractor shall buy parts directly from Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), Original Component Manufacturers (OCMs), and authorized distributors.

2.4.16 The contractor shall provide rationale for any exceptions to this and conduct a supply chain risk assessment to determine the potential risk of obtaining counterfeit parts from such sources. (A020 / DI-MGMT-82255A)

2.4.17 The contractor shall have processes to detect the occurrence, reduce the likelihood of counterfeit components or malicious functions.

2.4.18 The contractor shall establish testing and verification requirements for items not received from an OEM, OCM, or authorized distributor.

2.4.19 The contractor shall perform acceptance testing on the lowest Critical Components and components containing Critical Program Information.

2.4.20 The contractor shall describe the process of how suspected counterfeit, malicious, and counterfeit parts will be reported to the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program

(GIDEP).

2.4.21 The contractor shall base the level of testing and verification on each item’s identified risk for counterfeit potential.

2.4.22 The contractor shall provide Certificates of Conformance indicating the parts were tested and are not counterfeit. (A006 / DI-MISC-80508B/T)

2.5 Initial Formal Training

2.5.1 The Contractor shall provide Initial Formal Training (Type-1), including documentation, for systems affected by a configuration baseline change, IAW Appendix H.

2.6 Program Management Requirements

2.6.1 The Contractor shall conduct initial, Kick-Off Program Management Review (PMR), and three additional PMRs in Oklahoma City to review task schedule and technical and documentation requirements; conduct telecoms with the Government as required.

Provide PMR charts and minutes of meetings. (A021 / DI-MGMT-80368A, A022 / DI-

ADMN-81249C, A023 / DI-ADMN-81250C, A024 / DI-ADMN-81373)

USAFE3G-Page 11 of 17

2.6.2 The Contractor shall conduct required telecoms, with the Government Program/Engineering team to discuss design status, airworthiness requirements, and installation/testing matters. (A021 / DI-MGMT-80368A, A022 / DI-ADMN-81249C, A023 / DI-ADMN-81250C, A024 / DI-ADMN-81373)

2.6.3 The Contractor shall provide program management of the DAR-400 Obsolescence Resolution Program; coordination with the Government is vital in providing a comprehensive engineering package for follow-on solicitation and procurement of replacement kits.

2.6.4 The Contractor shall provide artifacts used in support of USAF's airworthiness/certification effort. Include all software and associated licenses, a completed Compliance Report in accordance with AFI 62-601, necessary data to complete SPO OSS&E checklist (intended artifacts shall be identified in initial kick-off meeting), and Configuration Control Board (CCB). Artifacts shall include, as a minimum, all the Environmental Qualification Test Reports. All System Test Reports upon conclusion of any testing (SOW para 2.2.14).

2.6.5 The system test reports will include security analysis reports, data reduction and analysis results, report of findings, provide instructions on how to use any audit reporting tools implemented and how to interpret audit reports. (A025 / DI-NDTI- 80809B)

2.6.6 The Contractor shall comply with the latest edition of MIL-STD-130, while including any appropriate Unique Identifier (UID) part labels, warning stickers, instructional labels, or identification tags.

2.6.7 The Contractor shall identify any HAZMAT associated with this solution set and meet the requirements per Appendices A-I.

2.6.8 The Contractor shall provide a final DAR program report in Contractor format (Microsoft Word). (A006 / DI-MISC-80508B/T)

2.6.9 The Contractor shall deliver the following documents, for Government approval, in Contractor format: Engineering Drawings, Test Plans, Test Procedures, Technical Orders (IAW TMCR, Appendix G), Integrated Master Schedule, Monthly Status Reports, Meeting Agendas/Minutes, Final Report, The Air Vehicle (AV) Checklist, Software checklist, Drawings (i.e. Drawing Tree, Top Modification Collector, Software Configuration Collector, Interface Design Documents, Interface Control Drawings, Product, Equipment Removal, Equipment and Enclosure Installation, Equipment Substitution, Connector Identification, Parts Replacement/ Substitution, Details, Assembly, Wiring Data, Wiring Installation, Wiring and Cable drawings, Installation, Selected Item, and Source Control). Parts Lists, Associated Lists, Architectural Design Documents, Software Design Documents and Software Description Documents, Software Version Description Documents, Test Plans, Test Directives, Test, Procedures, Test Reports Program and Engineering Documentation (A026 / DI-SESS-80639E)

2.7 Government Furnished Property

2.7.1 All government furnished property required to perform testing shall be provided by the government, including all Flight Crew, Ground Crew, and government personnel to test

USAFE3G-Page 12 of 17 solution set on ground, in aircraft and flight testing.

2.7.2 The Contractor shall be allowed to work with 552 ACNS to test solution sets.

2.8 Travel

2.8.1 The Contractor shall visit Oklahoma City/Tinker AFB as required to conduct PMRs and provide materials.

2.8.2 Contractor shall travel to perform PGSS solution set installation.

2.9 Period of Performance (PoP)

2.9.1 12 Months after Receipt of Order (ARO)

2.10 Ground Rules and Assumptions

2.10.1 This task is limited to the following USAF E-3G aircraft programs:

2.10.1.1 Mission Computing System (MCS)

2.10.1.2 Deployable Ground Systems (DGS)

2.10.1.3 Pacific Air Forces (PACAF) Ground Support System (PGSS)

2.10.1.4 Internet Protocol Enable Communications (IPEC)

2.10.1.5 Mission Support System (MSS)

2.10.2 The contractor shall install the first two (2) trial installation kits at Tinker AFB. The subsequent kit installations shall be completed by the USAF.

2.10.3 Ground and Flight testing are required, the contractor and USAF will work together to perform all ground and flight test support (pilots and ground support personnel).

2.10.4 As information is available, the Government shall provide the Contractor with access to Government documentation that may assist in performing this task.

2.10.5 Travel funding shall be included in the Contractor’s proposal.

2.10.6 Testing shall be completed as soon as possible after the kit-proof installation.

2.10.7 All documentation shall be provided to the Government with unlimited data rights.

3 MEETINGS, TELECONFERENCES AND REVIEWS

3.1 Kick-off Meeting

3.1.1 The Contractor shall host a Kick-off meeting at the government’s facility, Contractor facility or via telecom no later than 10 business days after Receipt of Order (ARO).

The Contractor shall include all schedules in MS Project format and shall include Tier 2 Level Milestone/Master Schedule, which includes all significant “not later than” dates and milestone achievements related to each task activity within 10 business days of ARO. The Contractor shall prepare and provide meeting announcement and agenda no later than 5 business days prior to the meeting. The Contractor shall prepare and provide meeting minutes, action items, and responses no later than 5 business days after the meeting. (A021 / DI-MGMT-80368A, A022 / DI-ADMN-81249C, A023 / DI-

ADMN-81250C, A024 / DI-ADMN-81373)

USAFE3G-Page 13 of 17

3.2 Program Management Review (PMRs)

3.2.1 The Contractor shall host necessary quarterly Program Management Reviews (PMRs) at the government’s facility or via telecom, to include estimated delivery dates, any technical questions.

3.2.2 The Contractor shall prepare and provide meeting announcements and agendas no later than five (5) business days prior to the meeting. (A022 / DI-ADMN-81249C, A024 /

DI-ADMN-81373)

3.2.3 The Contractor shall prepare and provide meeting minutes, action items, and responses no later than 5 business days after the meeting. (A021 / DI-MGMT-80368A, A023 /

DI-ADMN-81250C)

3.3 Status Reporting

3.3.1 The Contractor shall provide monthly status updates, starting no later than 30 business days after the Kick-off PMR. (A021 / DI-MGMT-80368A)

3.4 Delivery Schedule

3.4.1 The delivery/schedule period shall be 12 months and identified at the Contract Line Item Number (CLIN).

3.5 Inspection and Acceptance

3.5.1 Successful completion and passing of all the Pass/Fail criteria of the ATP as well as meeting NSA requirements shall constitute an acceptance.

3.5.2 Inspection Point: Destination

3.5.3 Acceptance: Destination

3.6 Package/Preservation: Best Commercial Shipping Information

3.6.1 All equipment shall be preserved, packaged and packed for shipment in accordance with best commercial practices to prevent mechanical and physical damage. Packaging shall be marked with all the proper information in accordance with AFMCI 24-201.

4 Data Deliverables

Table 2.1 Data Delivery

CDRL

Title/Subtitle of Data Item

Paragraph Reference Authority Frequency of Report

A001

Product Engineering Design Data and Associated Lists 2.1.6 (DI-SESS-81000F) 100 Days after award

A002 Installation Control Drawings 2.1.6 (DI-DRPR-81242) 120 Days prior to closeout

A003 Computer Software Product 2.1.6 (DI-IPSC- 81488) 120 Days prior to closeout

USAFE3G-Page 14 of 17

A004 Test Plan

2.1.14 2.1.15

2.1.16 (DI-NDTl-80566A) 100 Days after award

A005 Test Procedure

2.1.14 2.1.15

2.1.16 (DI-NDTl-80603A) 120 Days prior to closeout

A006 Technical Report – Study/Services

2.1.14 2.1.15 2.4.8.2 2.4.22

2.6.8 (DI-MISC-80508B/T) 100 Days after award

A007

Technical Report – Study/Services

(SSAD)

2.3.6 2.3.7.1

2.3.8 (DI-MISC-80508B/T) AS REQ

A008

Technical Report – Study/Services

(RAHR)

2.3.7.2 2.3.11

2.3.12 (DI-MISC-80508B/T) AS REQ

A009

Technical Report – Study/Services

(SCTM)

2.3.7.3

2.3.10 (DI-MISC-80508B/T) AS REQ

A010

Technical Report – Study/Services (CPI Analysis) 2.3.13 (DI-MISC-80508B/T) AS REQ

A011

Technical Report – Study/Services (Sanitization Analysis) 2.3.16 (DI-MISC-80508B/T) AS REQ

A012 Logistics Product Data 2.4.2 (DI-SESS-81758A/T) AS REQ

A013

Engineering Data for Provisioning

(EDFP) 2.4.3 (DI-SESS-81874T) AS REQ

A014

Installation and Checkout (INCO) Spares Listing 2.4.5 (DI-PSSS-81619A) AS REQ

A015

Spare Parts Usage Report (No S/S Document) 2.4.6.4 (DI-ILSS-80483) AS REQ

A016

Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages

(DMSMS)

Implementation Plan 2.4.8.2 (DI-MGMT-81949 AS REQ

USAFE3G-Page 15 of 17

A017

Technical Manual Contractor Requirement

(TMCR)

2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4

2.4.9.1.5 (TM-86-01) See Appendix G, TMCR

A018 Counterfeit Prevention Plan

2.4.10

2.4.12 (DI-MISC-81832) AS REQ

A019

Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) Plan 2.4.11 (DI-MGMT-82256A) AS REQ

A020 Supply Chain Risk Register 2.4.16 (DI-MGMT- 82255A) AS REQ

A021 Status Report

2.6.1 2.6.2 3.1.1 3.2.3

3.3.1 (DI-MGMT- 80368A) 10th day of every month

A022 Meeting Agenda

2.6.1 2.6.2 3.1.1

3.2.2 (DI-ADMN-81249C)

5 business days prior to PMRs

A023 Meeting Minutes

2.6.1 2.6.2 3.1.1

3.2.3 (DI-ADMN-81250C)

5 business days after last meeting

A024 Presentation Material

2.6.1 2.6.2 3.1.1

3.2.2 (DI-ADMN-81373)

3 business days prior to PMRs

A025 Test/Inspection Report 2.6.5 (DI-NDTI-80809B) 120 days prior to closeout

A026

Engineering Change Proposal

(ECP) 2.6.9 (DI-SESS-80639E) AS REQ

USAFE3G-Page 16 of 17

Table 2.2 Hardware Delivery

Line Item

Description of Deliverable Paragraph Reference

Due Date (Business Days)

1 16 AC (48 A/B kits) (2 Mission Computing / 1 IPEC per AC)

2.1.2 120 Days prior to closeout

2 10 DGS (10 A/B kits) (1 per) 2.1.2 120 Days prior to closeout

3 2 PGSS (2 A/B kits) (1 per) 2.1.2 120 Days prior to closeout

4 9 MSS (9 A/B kits) (1 per) 2.1.2 120 Days prior to closeout

5 AISF Lab (30 A/B kits) 2.1.2 120 Days prior to closeout

6 11 Initial Spare kits 2.1.2 120 Days prior to closeout

Total 108 kits needed 2.1.2 120 Days prior to closeout

USAFE3G-Page 17 of 17

5 Appendix A – 888-16001 - E-3G System Set

6 Appendix B – 888-16096 – E-3G Air Vehicle Functional Group

7 Appendix C – 888-16129 - E-3G Ground Support Functional Group

8 Appendix D – 888-16142 - E-3G Mission Computing

9 Appendix E – 888-16927 - E-3G IPEC Functional Group

10 Appendix F – Classified Data at Rest (DAR) Encryption Requirements (via SIPRNet)

11 Appendix G – Technical Manual Contractor Requirement (TMCR)

12 Appendix H – Type 1 Training Documentation

2.4.8.2 The Contractor shall provide data for RAM-C improvements…