CST Programmatic Enforcement Review Checklist.pdf
PDF 38 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Community Safety Grants - FY 2018
- Opportunity number
- HM-CST-18-001
- Issued by
-
Department of Transportation
About this file
Programmatic Enforcement Review Checklist
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FY18 CST Funding Announcment - FAQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| CST Budget Review Checklist.pdf | ||
| CST Programmatic Outreach Review Checklist.pdf | ||
| CST Technical Enforcement Review Checklist.pdf | ||
| Community Safety NOFO FINAL.docx | DOCX document | |
| Title VI Assurance Statement.docx | DOCX document | |
| ED-80 Form.pdf | ||
| oppHM-CST-18-001-cfda20.703-cidHM-CST-18-001-instructions.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Grant Program: Community Safety Training Grant Programmatic Enforcement Review Checklist
Applicant Name:
Reviewer Name:
Date of Review:
1. Does the applicant have the existing capacity to reach and train state and local enforcement personnel on the safe transportation of hazardous materials?
Yes No
Comments:
2. Does the applicant address plans to train responders in rural areas?
Yes No
Comments:
3. Does the applicant have the ability to establish a curriculum that complies with the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR)?
Yes No
Comments:
4. Does the applicant have the ability to establish a curriculum in accordance with the Hazardous Materials Transportation Investigator/Inspector Uniform Training Performance Standards?
Yes No
Comments:
5. Does the applicant provide comprehensive needs assessment related to the deficiency of training for state and local personnel that are responsible for enforcing the safe transportation of hazardous materials, including Class 3 flammable liquids?
Yes No
Comments:
6. Does the applicant possess the capacity to effectively deliver an established training curriculum to state and local personnel responsible for enforcing of the safe transportation of hazardous materials? (Curriculum may include either: (1) web-based training; or (2) direct training (on-site); or (3) a combination of the two.)
Yes No
Comments:
7. Are the program activities allowable, allocable, necessary and reasonable?
Yes No
Comments:
8. Does the applicant provide a timeline that clearly communicates when project activities will take place?
9. Does the application list clear outputs, goals and objectives that indicate the grant will have a projected impact on reducing risk and enhancing hazmat transportation safety?
10. Does the application appear to be cost effective?
11. Does the applicant outline a monitoring and evaluation strategy to help ensure that the project will be successful?
12. Does the organization have prior experience in providing hazmat training and the proposed site specific facilities/mechanisms in place to conduct the training?
Overall Comments:
Recommended Special Terms/Conditions:
Summary Recommendation:
(Exceptional; Acceptable; Unacceptable)
File details come from the government source that posted it.