Cost_Formula-reward_average_cost_for_RFP.docx

DOCX document 15 KB Posted

Attached to
Final Remedial Action Plan for 0 Gibbs St
Solicitation number
2025-RFP-CNH-296
Issued by
New Haven County, Connecticut

About this file

This file is a scoring methodology document related to a City of New Haven, Connecticut contract opportunity for Phase III site investigation and preparation of a final Remedial Action Plan (RAP) for 0 Gibbs Street. The City seeks qualified Licensed Environmental Professionals to conduct the investigation work necessary to support remediation of the property, which will ultimately be converted to a public park. The specific details regarding response dates, due dates, site visits, bidders' meetings, and contract term are not included in this document.

The document explains cost formula scoring methods, specifically the "Reward Low Cost" approach, which calculates proposal points by dividing the lowest overall cost by each proposal's cost and applying the resulting percentage to available points. The contract is funded through a $250,000 grant from the Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development (DECD), with a portion allocated to the scope of work described and the remainder dedicated to beginning the remediation phase. The scoring methodology detailed here establishes how cost competitiveness will be evaluated during the bid selection process, with lower-cost proposals receiving proportionally higher point allocations.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Final_Remedial_Action_Plan_for_0_Gibbs_St_(Addendum_#1_Revision).pdf PDF
Final_Remedial_Action_Plan_for_0_Gibbs_St_(Addendum_#1_Revision).pdf PDF
9a-Exhibit__RFP_Standard_Form_of_Agreement_-_City_of_New_Haven_(1).pdf PDF
9a-Exhibit__RFP_Standard_Form_of_Agreement_-_City_of_New_Haven_(1).pdf PDF
Final_Remedial_Action_Plan_for_0_Gibbs_St.pdf PDF
Attachment_H_-_Proposed_Park_Final_Phase_I_ESA_05282021.pdf PDF
Attachment_H_-_Proposed_Park_Final_Phase_I_ESA_05282021.pdf PDF
Attachment_I_-_N-RPT-2101230-0_Gibbs_Street-PII-III-Final-2022-05-24.pdf PDF
Attachment_G_-_0_Gibbs_Street_Phase_III_Environmental_Site_Assessment_Conclusions_and_Recommendations.pdf PDF
Attachment_I_-_N-RPT-2101230-0_Gibbs_Street-PII-III-Final-2022-05-24.pdf PDF
Attachment_J_-_N-RPT-2101230-0_Gibbs_Street-PII-III-FINAL-2023-06-15.pdf PDF
Attachment_G_-_0_Gibbs_Street_Phase_III_Environmental_Site_Assessment_Conclusions_and_Recommendations.pdf PDF
Attachment_G_-_0_Gibbs_Street_Phase_III_Environmental_Site_Assessment_Conclusions_and_Recommendations.pdf PDF
Attachment_I_-_N-RPT-2101230-0_Gibbs_Street-PII-III-Final-2022-05-24.pdf PDF
Attachment_J_-_N-RPT-2101230-0_Gibbs_Street-PII-III-FINAL-2023-06-15.pdf PDF
Attachment_H_-_Proposed_Park_Final_Phase_I_ESA_05282021.pdf PDF
Attachment_J_-_N-RPT-2101230-0_Gibbs_Street-PII-III-FINAL-2023-06-15.pdf PDF
ARPA_Contractor_Agreement_($100000_OR_LESS)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
ARPA_Subrecipient_Subaward_Agreement_($100000_OR_LESS)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
ARPA_Contractor_Agreement_($100000_OR_LESS)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
Evaluation_Criteria_for_OpenGov.docx DOCX document
9b-Exhibit__RFP_Standard_Terms_Part_II_-_City_of_New_Haven.pdf PDF
ARPA_Contractor_Agreement_($100000_OR_LESS)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
ARPA_Subrecipient_Subaward_Agreement_(More_Than_$100000)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
9a-Exhibit__RFP_Standard_Form_of_Agreement_-_City_of_New_Haven.pdf PDF
Evaluation_Criteria_for_OpenGov.docx DOCX document
ARPA_Contractor_Agreement_(More_Than_$100000)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
ARPA_Subrecipient_Subaward_Agreement_($100000_OR_LESS)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
ARPA_Subrecipient_Subaward_Agreement_(More_Than_$100000)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
ARPA_Contractor_Agreement_(More_Than_$100000)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
ARPA_Subrecipient_Subaward_Agreement_($100000_OR_LESS)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
Cost_Formula-reward_average_cost_for_RFP.docx DOCX document
Evaluation_Criteria_for_OpenGov.docx DOCX document
Sample_Eval_Criteria_and_Rating_Plan.docx DOCX document
ARPA_Contractor_Agreement_(More_Than_$100000)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
9a-Exhibit__RFP_Standard_Form_of_Agreement_-_City_of_New_Haven.pdf PDF
9b-Exhibit__RFP_Standard_Terms_Part_II_-_City_of_New_Haven.pdf PDF
Cost_Formula-reward_average_cost_for_RFP.docx DOCX document
Sample_Eval_Criteria_and_Rating_Plan.docx DOCX document
9b-Exhibit__RFP_Standard_Terms_Part_II_-_City_of_New_Haven.pdf PDF
ARPA_Subrecipient_Subaward_Agreement_(More_Than_$100000)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
Sample_Eval_Criteria_and_Rating_Plan.docx DOCX document
9a-Exhibit__RFP_Standard_Form_of_Agreement_-_City_of_New_Haven.pdf PDF
Show all 43

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

A Closer Look at Cost Formulas The scoring methods Reward Average Cost and Reward Low Cost rely on cost formulas to track and calculate point values. Reward Low Cost, for example, uses this equation to determine how many points each individual submission should receive:

Lowest overall cost / Proposal's cost = X% of the possible points Expand the tabs to see Reward Low Cost in action.

Proposal A costs $100. How many points will it receive?

$100 (Lowest Proposal) / $100 (Proposal A) = 100% of 30 points

30 points awarded Proposal B costs $200. How many points will it receive?

$100 (Lowest Proposal) / $200 (Proposal B) = 50% of 30 points 15 points awarded Proposal C costs $500. How many points will it receive?

$100 (Lowest Proposal) / $500 (Proposal C) = 20% of 30 points 6 points awarded

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .