Competition Evaluation Factors for the Army Blood link.pdf
PDF 61 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amendment 1 (Clarifications Q&A) to: Army Blood Link (ABL) – Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS)
- Solicitation number
- A050748
About this file
This document presents the evaluation factors and weightings for proposals in response to an Army solicitation for an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) designed to transport blood products for medical brigade personnel.
The evaluation framework consists of eight factors totaling 1.0 in weight. Price carries the highest weighting at 0.30 and evaluates total proposed cost relative to technical performance. Compact Design & Portability (0.20 weight) assesses packed size/weight constraints, ease of transport and assembly by small teams, and payload container integration. Technical Performance & Mission Effectiveness (0.15 weight) evaluates the system's ability to meet key specifications including payload capacity of 20 blood units (25–50 lb, minimum 35 lb), 30 km radius/100 km mission range, delivery accuracy within 10 meters, day/night operations with 30-mile communications range, operating temperature range of 15°F–120°F at up to 18,000 feet, and delivery within 3 months of award. Thermal Control & Payload Protection (0.10 weight) requires the transport container to maintain blood temperature for up to 3 hours under specified ambient conditions while protecting against rain, dust, sand, solar heating, chemical contamination, and providing shock protection. Additional evaluation factors address Autonomy, Navigation, and Detect-and-Avoid capabilities (0.08 weight); Reliability, Maintainability, and Service Life with expected operational life of 500–1500 flight hours and probability of successful delivery ≥90% (0.07 weight); Compliance and Risk including U.S. origin requirements and SRD flight approval likelihood (0.07 weight); and Training, Human Factors, and Operational Suitability for medical personnel with minimal technical background (0.03 weight).
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 1_Clarifications.pdf | ||
| Salient Characteristics Army Bloodlink.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Competition Evaluation Factors for the Army Blood link (ABL): Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for Blood Product Transport.
Evaluation Factors and Weights (Total = 1.0)
1. Price – Weight: 0.30
a. Evaluates total proposed price, and value relative to technical performance.
2. Compact Design & Portability – Weight: 0.20
a. Degree to which the system meets or exceeds packed size/weight constraints for employment by medical brigade personnel.
b. Ease of transport, assembly/disassembly, and loading by a small team.
c. Integration of payload container within a compact, field-suitable form factor.
3. Technical Performance & Mission Effectiveness – Weight: 0.15
a. Ability to meet or exceed key salient characteristics:
i. Payload capacity (20 blood units, 25–50 lb range, min 35 lb).
ii. Payload volume and blood bag accommodation.
iii. Range, endurance, mission distance, 30 km radius/100 km mission.
iv. Delivery accuracy (≤ 10 m) and optional aerial drop performance.
v. Day/night operations, 30-mile comms range, and required operating environment (15 °F–120 °F, high humidity, up to 18,000 ft).
b. Overall demonstrated or documented mission effectiveness for the blood transport use case.
c. Delivery date within 3 months of award.
4. Thermal Control & Payload Protection – Weight: 0.10
a. Ability of the validated transport container to:
i. Maintain required blood temperature range for up to 3 hours under specified ambient conditions.
ii. Protect from rain, dust, sand, solar heating, and chemical contamination.
iii. Provide adequate shock protection, monitoring, and restraint without damaging blood products.
5. Autonomy, Navigation, and Detect-and-Avoid – Weight: 0.08
a. Quality of semi-autonomous capabilities (waypoint navigation, return-to-base, automated mission profiles).
b. Robustness of detect-and-avoid systems for aircraft/obstacle deconfliction in contested/denied environments.
c. Ability to support simultaneous operations of multiple aircraft in the same area.
6. Reliability, Maintainability, and Service Life – Weight: 0.07
a. Expected operational life (500–1500 flight hours) and demonstrated/component reliability.
b. Maintenance intervals (300–500 cycles), ease of field repair by operators, modularity, and availability of parts/obsolescence plan.
c. Probability of successful delivery (≥ 90%) under specified conditions and proposed warranty coverage (≥ 1 year or better).
7. Compliance and Risk (Regulatory, Origin, and Integration) – Weight: 0.07
a. Compliance with U.S. origin requirements (no prohibited foreign components/software/cloud/support).
b. Likelihood of achieving SRD flight approval based on system design, documentation, and test approach.
c. Use of mature COTS elements and overall technical/ schedule risk to reach a TRL 9 prototype and successful operational demonstration.
8. Training, Human Factors, and Operational Suitability – Weight: 0.03
a. Quality and completeness of the proposed 1–5 day training program.
b. Suitability for operation and servicing by typical medical brigade personnel with minimal technical background.
c. Operator workload, interface usability, and support for single-operator control of one aircraft.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .