Comparative Evaluation.docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W911QX24Q0021
About this file
This document is a Comparative Evaluation that outlines the procedures for evaluating offers received in response to a federal contract solicitation. The solicitation is for a Small Business Set-Aside for one (1) Experimentation Support Trailer, with Solicitation Number W911QX24Q0021.
The key details include: The award will be made to the offer that is most advantageous to the Government, based on a comparative evaluation of price, technical capabilities/specifications, and past performance. Offers must meet the Government's minimum technical requirements to be considered for award. If only one acceptable offer is received from a responsible small business, the Contracting Officer may award directly to that firm. If no acceptable small business offers are received, the solicitation will convert to full and open competition. The acquisition is issued as a Request for Quote (RFQ), with a NAICS code of 336212 and a small business size standard of 1,000 employees. Delivery of the Experimentation Support Trailer is required within seven (7) months after contract award.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Question and Answer Responses.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Salient Characteristics (Amendment 0001) (Solicitation Version).pdf | ||
| Provisions and Clauses Full-Text Attachment (for Combo Synopsis-Solicitation).doc | DOC document | |
| Salient Characteristics.pdf | ||
| Combination Synopsis-Solicitation for Commercial Purchases.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Comparative Evaluation
In accordance with FAR 13.106-2(b)(3), comparative evaluation procedures will be utilized. Comparative evaluation is the comparison of all offers received in response to this solicitation against each other. An item-by-item comparison of each offer to one another will be performed to determine which offer provides the most benefit to the Government. Award will be made to the offer that is most advantageous to the Government. The Government may award to the lowest priced offeror that meets the Government’s minimum requirements; however, the Government reserves the right to award to a higher priced offeror exceeding the minimum requirements if it is most advantageous to the Government. In order to be considered for award, an offer must meet the Government’s minimum technical requirement contained in this solicitation. The below evaluation factors will be utilized during evaluation (in no order of relative importance):
Price Technical Capabilities/Specification, including, but not limited to:
· Ability to meet the Government’s minimum technical requirements.
· Ruggedness of the proposed product.
· Quality of components and subsystems that comprise the proposed product.
· Quality of the digital information (i.e. blueprints) included with the proposed product.
· Ease of use of the proposed product.
· Delivery schedule for the proposed product.
Past Performance
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .