The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
ATTACHMENT 7: QUESTION & ANSWER MATRIX
| # |
| RFP Section |
| Question |
| Response |
| Change to RFP? |
| Description of Change |
| Technical/ Contractual |
| 1 |
| SF 1449 - #20 Schedule of Supplies/Services ; B.1 General & C.3 Scope of Work |
| The Solicitation wording intermixes program funding methods between Administrative Services Only (ASO) and Insurance (Fully Insured) in various sections. Will the OCC accept “insured” quotes as being compliant? If so, should the CLIN’s be interpreted as looking for a composite premium rate for insured quotes or should a tiered rate (EE, EE+1 & EE+2>) structure be offered? |
| This solicitation is for an Administrative Service Only Vision Plan. |
The OCC will not accept composite based premium rates for this solicitation.
| 2 |
| General |
| Who is the current administrator? |
| United Healthcare Vision (Spectera) |
| No |
| None |
| Technical |
| 3 |
| General |
| Do you have a current benefit summary to compare with our proposal? |
| No – no such document currently exists |
| No |
| None |
| Technical |
| 4 |
| General |
| What is the current ASO fee? |
| OCC is not at liberty to answer this question. |
| No |
| None |
| Technical |
| 5 |
| General |
| The pivot table on the census shows 4164 eligible but the RFP refers to 3959, which is correct? |
| The 3,959 is the total number of OCC employees however the 4,164 headcount figures includes OCC employees, OFR employees, and OCC disabled retirees. |
| No |
| None |
| Technical |
| 6 |
| General |
| RFP refers to employer paid, does that include dependents? |
| Yes. |
| No |
| None |
| Technical |
| 7 |
| General |
| Would claims savings be a consideration in the overall cost of the contract? |
| No. |
| No |
| None |
| Contractual |
