Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 26 KB Posted

Attached to
Advanced Capital Markets Instructor-Led Training
Solicitation number
CC15HQR0021
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
OCC_QA_Matrix_-_Response_to_Vendor_Questions.pdf PDF
CC15HQR0021.pdf PDF
Attach_2_-_QA_Matrix__for_Vendor__Questions.docx DOCX document
OCC_IT_Accessibility_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Past_Performance_Reference.docx DOCX document
Advanced_Capital_Markets_-_Solicitation.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The company from whom you received this questionnaire is proposing on a solicitation to provide services to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Past Performance is an extremely important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition and your input is important. When you have completed this questionnaire, please email it to Karen.green@occ.treas.gov. Do not submit the completed questionnaire to the offeror proposing on this solicitation. If you have questions, please contact Karen A. Green at (202) 649-8120.

This survey pertains to (Offeror Name): __________________________________________ Solicitation Number: ____________________________________________________________ Date of Survey: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Person Completing Survey: _______________________________________________ Signature of Person Completing Survey: _____________________________________________ Your Company/Agency: _________________________________________________________ Your Role in this Contract: _______________________________________________________ Period of Performance for Contract: ________________________________________________ General description of products/services required under the contract: ______________________

RATINGS

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible.

Assign each area a rating of either 4 (Excellent), 3 (Good), 2 (Acceptable), or 1 (Unacceptable). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating. Annotate with N/A if not a rating consideration or inapplicable to the contract effort.

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

1. Compliance with contract requirements:

1 2 3 4 N/A

2. Accuracy of reports:

1 2 3 4 N/A

3. Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel:

1 2 3 4 N/A

4. Capability of personnel to perform required services:

1 2 3 4 N/A

5. Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services:

1 2 3 4 N/A

6. Overall quality of product/service:

1 2 3 4 N/A

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

1. Reliability:

1 2 3 4 N/A

2. Responsive to technical direction:

1 2 3 4 N/A

3. Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines:

1 2 3 4 N/A

BUSINESS RELATIONS:

1. Effective management, including subcontracts:

1 2 3 4 N/A

2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior:

1 2 3 4 N/A

3. Responsive to contract requirements:

1 2 3 4 N/A

4. Notification of problems:

1 2 3 4 N/A

5. Flexibility:

1 2 3 4 N/A

6. Pro-active vs. reactive:

1 2 3 4 N/A

COST CONTROL:

1. Current, accurate and complete billings:

1234N/A
2.Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals:
1234N/A

3. Cost efficiencies:

1 2 3 4 N/A

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:

a. Contractor Management Personnel (circle one) Yes No

b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel (circle one) Yes No

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Request for Proposal – Advanced Capital Markets Instructor-Led Training

RFP #CC15HQR0021

Attachment 4

Rating Guidelines

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
COST CONTROL
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
BUSINESS RELATIONS
4-Outstanding
There were no quality issues, and the contractor significantly exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate additional costs to the customer.
There were no cost management issues, and the contractor significantly exceeded the contract requirements, achieving cost savings to the customer.
There were no delays, and the contractor significantly bettered the agreed upon schedule.
Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues significantly exceeded customer expectations.
3-Good
There were no, or minimal, quality problems, and the contractor exceeded the contract requirements.
There were no, or minimal, cost management issues, and the contractor exceeded the contract requirements.
There were no, or minimal, delays that affected achievement of contract requirements, and the contractor bettered the agreed upon schedule.
Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues exceeded the contract requirements.
2-Acceptable
The contractor met the contract requirements. Overall compliance required some assistance from the customer.
The contractor met the contract requirements. Customer provided some assistance to the contractor to manage costs.
The contractor met the agreed upon schedule. Customer provided some assistance to ensure the contractor met the agreed upon schedule.
Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues met the contract requirements.
1-Unsatisfactory
The contractor did not meet the contract requirements. Nonconformances compromised the achievement of contract requirements.
The contractor did not meet the contract requirements. Contractor was unable to manage costs effectively.
The contractor did not meet the agreed upon schedule. Contractor delays jeopardized achievement of contract objectives.
The contractor did not meet the contract requirements. Responses to inquiries, technical/service/admin-istrative issues were not timely or effective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .