C04. PPQ interview evaluation.pdf
PDF 173 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CONUS Drilling Services - St. Louis District Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912P921R0037
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B01. Final Solicitation.pdf | ||
| B01. Final Solicitation.pdf | ||
| 52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications.pdf | ||
| A02. Pricing Schedule Section B.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| C04. PPQ.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Telephone Interview
Contractor: Contract No.:
Subcontract No. (if applicable):
POC: Title:
(Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)
(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail & Facsimile No.)
If conducting a telephone interview:
“Hello, I am . I am calling in reference to Contract with a company called . My questions will pertain to the contractor’s record of past, which is defined as within the past three years, and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. A summary of this discussion may be sent to you for your records.
Please provide examples and/or explanations, and utilize the following ratings:
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
*Note: rationale is required for each response.
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence
Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale:
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale:
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale:
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale:
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale:
Comments:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name):
Telephone Number:
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. RECORD OF INTERVIEW (To be completed by PPT Member)
( ) Discussed recentness and relevance of information ( ) Read summary to person contacted Date:
( ) Sent copy to person contacted Date:
PPT Member Signature Typed or Printed Name
Telephone Fax
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .