Brand Name Justification.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Cisco Switches
- Solicitation number
- FA468624Q0017
About this file
The document provided is a Brand Name Justification related to a federal contract opportunity. It describes the requirement for Cisco Catalyst Ethernet Switches, specifically the Catalyst C9200-48P and C9300-48S Network Switches. The justification indicates that the Air Combat Command contracting activity is procuring these brand-name items under an exception to fair opportunity pursuant to FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i). The total estimated cost for the purchase is $726,469.78. The document provides details on the nature and description of the action, the supplies/services required, the rationale for the brand-name restriction, and actions the agency may take to remove or overcome barriers to increasing fair opportunity in the future. The contracting officer and program manager have certified the accuracy and completeness of the information contained in the justification.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQ Combo Cisco Switches.pdf | ||
| RFQ Combo Cisco Switches.pdf | ||
| Statement of Need (SON).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Please wait...
If this message is not eventually replaced by the proper contents of the document, your PDF viewer may not be able to display this type of document.
You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader for Windows®, Mac, or Linux® by visiting http://www.adobe.com/go/reader_download.
For more assistance with Adobe Reader visit http://www.adobe.com/go/acrreader.
Windows is either a registered trademark or a trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Mac is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other countries.
Justification for an Exception to Fair Opportunity or to Use Brand-Name Restriction March 2018 Page of Is this a brand-name justification?
Please provide the product title and description. [ FAR16.505(a)(4)(i) ] Is this a Bridge Action as defined in the AF Bridge Action Reduction Plan?
Type Program (see AFFARS 5302.101 for definitions):
Fair Opportunity Exception: FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i), subparagraph Type of D etermination:
Click here for instructions to complete the boxes below.
(1) Contracting Activity:
(2) Nature and/or description of the action being approved:
(3) Description of the supplies/services required to meet the agency's needs:
(4) Justification for restricting consideration to a brand-name item:
(4) Identification of the exception to fair opportunity and the supporting rationale:
(5) Contracting Officer's determination that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable:
(6) Other facts supporting the justification:
(7) Actions the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to decreasing the use of brand-name items before any subsequent acquisition of the supplies or services:
(7) Actions the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to increasing fair opportunity before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services:
(8) Program Manager's certification that supporting data is accurate and complete:
As evidenced by my signature below, I certify that any supporting data contained herein, which is my responsibility, is both accurate and complete.
(9) Contracting Officer's certification that the justification is accurate and complete:
As evidenced by my signature below, I certify that the justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
(10) Approving Official's determination that FAR16.505(a)(4)(i) applies to the order:
As evidenced by my signature below, I hereby determine that the use of brand-name restriction applies.
(10) Approving Official's determination that one of the circumstances in FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i) applies to the order.
As evidenced by my signature below, I hereby determine that the fair opportunity exception checked on page 1 applies.
NOTE: The text in the signature blocks below is editable, including the title.
9.0.0.2.20120627.2.874785
| security_markings: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| CurrentPage: |
| PageCount: |
| Yes: |
| No: |
| Brand-Name-Title_hidden: Cisco Catalyst Ethernet Switches |
| Brand-Name-Description_hidden: Catalyst C9200-48P and C9300-48S Network Switches |
| Contacting-Activity: 9th Contracting Squadron (9 CONS) |
| Purchase-Request: |
| Program-Name: |
| Cost-Price: $726,469.78 |
| PEO-Program: 0 |
| Other-Contracting: 1 |
| subparagraph-A: 0 |
| subparagraph-B: 0 |
| subparagraph-C: 0 |
| subparagraph-D: 0 |
| subparagraph-E: 0 |
| Individual: |
| Class: |
| Expiration_Date: |
| A: |
| CAUTION: |
| Date: 10 Jan 2019 |
| Date: 04 Apr 2024 |
| Name: |
| Signature: |
| Hide-PM-Coord: |
| Hide-CO-Coord: |
| Hide-Legal-Coord: |
| Hide-COCO-Coord: |
| Hide-CA-Coord: |
| Hide-SCO-Coord: |
| Hide-Approval-Coord: |
| Hide-Blank-1-Coord: |
| Hide-Blank-2-Coord: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .