BPM004287-Eval_Consensus_Report-_Lead_Service_Line_.pdf
PDF 251 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR065872
- Contract number
- CTR065872
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Report for Solicitation No. BPM004287 for Statewide Asbestos, Lead, and Mold Consultant and Abatement Services, specifically for Lead Service Line Identification and Inventory Consultant Services. The evaluation was conducted by a committee that included Merrilyn Forbin (Senior Procurement Specialist), Jason Bobko, and Chelsey Vega. Four contractors were recommended for award: 120 Water Audit, Inc; Hazen and Sawyer; CDM Smith, Inc; and TruePani Inc.
The solicitation evaluated proposals across three main criteria: Method of Approach (500 points), Experience, Expertise, Reliability, and Capacity (400 points), and Overall Price Proposal (100 points). The scoring methodology used rating definitions including Unacceptable, Below Expectations, Meets Expectations, Above Expectations, and Exceeds Expectations. The evaluated contractors received varied scores, with CDM Smith scoring 629, 120 Water Audit scoring 669, Hazen and Sawyer scoring 641, and TruePani scoring 550. The pricing component was calculated using a formula of Lowest Price / Offered Price multiplied by Maximum Points. The recommended contractors demonstrated understanding of project goals, data management capabilities, and expertise in lead service line identification and inventory consulting services.
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION REPORT
Solicitation No. BPM004287
Rating Definitions for Criteria 1 and 2
Formula for Scoring Overall Price (Criteria
Total Score
Weight 1 - Method of Approach = 500 points
500 1.1 Method of Approach Above Expectations 375 Above Expectations 375 Above Expectations 375 Meets Expectations 250
Weight
2 - Experience, Expertise, Reliability, Capacity of Organization and Key Personnel = 400 points
2.1 Experience, Expertise and Reliability of
Offeror's Key Personnel and Organization Meets Expectations 200 Meets Expectations 200 Meets Expectations 200 Meets Expectations 200
Weight 3 - Overall Price Proposal = 100 points
100 (118/220)*100 54 (118/126)*100 94 (118/180)*100 66 (118/118)*100 100
Comments
Merrilyn Forbin Senior Procurement Specialist Date
Evaluator Name: Jason Bobko Date
Evaluator Name:Chelsey Vega Date
The members of the evaluation committee have completed their review and reached a consensus regarding the proposals received in response to Solicitation No. _BPM004287 for "_Statewide Asbestos, Lead, and Mold Consultant and Abatement Services' Lead Service Line Consulting Designation". This evaluation report accurately and completely reflects the opinion of the committee as a whole. Therefore, in accordance with Solicitation Instructions to Offerors, Section 1-A, Section 5 and Section 1-B, Section 6 and Section 7, it is recommended that it would be in the best interest of the State to make an award to the following Contractors: 120 Water Audit, Inc; Hazen and Sawyer; CDM Smith, Inc; and TruePani Inc.
For each evaluation criteria that follows, a determination was made regarding how well the proposals satisfied the stated requirements.
The rating definitions, found below, formed the basis for determining the scores assigned to each proposal. The comments fields were used to note strengths and weaknesses of the proposal.
Description: Statewide Asbestos Lead, and Mold Consultant and Abatement Services
54 94 66 100
200 200 200 200
375 375 375 250
Descriptive proposal. Offeror demonstrated a clearl understanding of the goal .Offeror proposed a strong data management software. Data can be exported in any format requested.
Descriptive proposal. Offeror demonstrated a clearl understanding of the goal .Offeror proposed a strong data management software. Data can be exported in any format requested.
The Offeror displayed a baseline of understanding of Arizona plumbing code, which shows a clear understanding of where they would start their research.
Detailed LSL Identification approach and a project timeline.
[HAZEN AND SAWYER] [TruePANI]
629 669 641 550
Unacceptable = Elements of the proposal that are unacceptable to the State.
Lowest Price / Offered Price X Maximum Points = Awarded Points
Offerors [CDM SMITH ] [120 WATER AUDIT]
Above Expectations = Proposal meets all requirement(s) outlined in the RFP but also Meets Expectations = Proposal meets requirement(s) outlined in the RFP.
Below Expectation = Proposal doesn’t fully meet or doesn’t completely address
Discipline: Lead Service Line Identification and Inventory Consultant Services
Exceeds Expectations = Proposal is very detailed, indicates a clear understanding of
5/5/2023
5/5/2023
5/5/2023
Sheet1
| 2023-05-26T19:19:44-0700 | |
| Digitally verifiable PDF exported from www.docusign.com |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .