BOR-MP-17-F004 GGS Habitat Restoration FOA.pdf

Funding Opportunity Announcement No. BOR-MP-17-F004 talcing this approach as opposed to others. The plan should also describe unusual features of the project, such as design or technological innovations, innovative cost- and time-saving measures, or extraordinary social and community involvements required to implement the project. The implementation activities should be shown in chronological order to depict the schedule accomplishments and expected target completion dates, and the criteria to be used to evaluate the results and success of the project should be discussed.

T bl 1 S h d I f M . M.l t a e c e u e o a.10r 1 es ones Task Name

1 Draft Design I Final Design 2 USFWS Approval of Design

2 Environmental Compliance and Permits

3 As-built drawings 3 Copies of any agreements, easements, or other permanent rights 4 Agreement documenting protection into perpetuity

Final Due Date

June 1, 2018 June I, 2019 Target June 1, July 1, 2020 Ausrust 1, 2022 August 1, 2022

August 1, 2022

5 Final Report January 31, 2023

Management and Financial Points Capability Min: 0 Poor performance history, incomplete Implementation Plans, vague schedules

Demonstrated performance Max: 20 history, complete Implementation and Financial Plans

V.A.4. Cost Effectiveness (15 points maximum)

Applications will be evaluated based on the total cost per acre of Giant Garter Snalce habitat created, restored, or protected. Costs will include all components requesting funding in the proposal, including construction, planning, design, environmental compliance, operation and maintenance and protection into perpetuity, etc. Applications with the lowest cost per acre will generally be given highest priority. Applicant(s) include the methodology utilized to come up with and support the cost per acre (are they including all costs, only O&M costs, etc.)

Cost effectiveness = cost/ acre