Bid tabulation~8.pdf

PDF 104 KB Posted

Attached to
WWTRRF Blower Package
Solicitation number
S-KN0040-00007421
Issued by
Union County, Oregon

About this file

This document is a bid tabulation for a request for quotes (RFQ) issued by the City of Pendleton for a WWTRRF Blower Package. The RFQ was due on August 3, 2023 at 2:00 pm. Four proposers submitted quotes, with Granich Engineered Products, Inc. submitting the lowest responsive quote at $54,792.00. Two proposers, Apsco, LLC and Granich Engineered Products, Inc., were deemed non-responsive due to not meeting certain requirements outlined in the RFQ, such as the VFD not meeting Allen-Bradley specifications and the total cost not including start-up and training costs.

The WWTRRF Blower Package is a project located in Umatilla County, Oregon. The scope includes providing a blower package for the Wastewater Treatment Resource Recovery Facility. Pricing terms, set asides, and funding sources are not explicitly stated in the document. However, the document indicates that the City of Pendleton is the contracting agency for this project.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Addendum No. 1~5.pdf PDF
Notice of Intent to Award-Kinney Humbug NEPA CE ITB.pdf PDF
NOIA-Interested Parties~3.pdf PDF
RFQ.documents.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CITY OF PENDLETON

Request for Quotes

WWTRRF Blower Package Due Date: 2:00 pm, August 3, 2023

PROPOSER

QUOTE AMOUNT

*Aerzen USA Corp

Coatesville, PA

$55,015.00

**Apsco, LLC

Kirkland, WA

$60,461.00

***Granich Engineered Products, Inc.

Seattle, WA

$54,792.00

Universal Blower Pac

Noblesville, IN

$96,878.00

*Indicates Low Proposer

**Non-Responsive: Due to not meeting the following requirements:

• VFD doesn’t meet Allen-Bradley specifications

• Blower components not rebuildable on site

***Non-Responsive: Due to not meeting the following requirements:

• Total Cost did not include Start Up and Training Costs

• VFD doesn’t meet Allen-Bradley specifications

• No minimum CFM for proposed model

• Addendum No. 1 not submitted with Quote

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .