BACN ROBE CLS RFI - Questions and Answers 12032024.pdf
PDF 188 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document for a Request for Information (RFI) regarding Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) for the Roll-On Beyond Line-of-Sight Enhancement (ROBE) system. The document addresses technical questions about proprietary components, data packages, and software requirements.
Key details include that most components are copyright controlled by Northrop Grumman, with data packages available if an RFP is issued. The Airborne Executive Processor (AEP) runs government-owned SPIDR software, while BC3 is a Rockwell Collins commercial product. The government will not require reverse engineering of proprietary systems but expresses interest in cost-saving measures such as transitioning to open modular architecture and standardizing hardware/software interfaces across platforms like KC-46, BACN, and AWACS. The contractor will be required to maintain software/firmware systems except for the government-controlled SPIDR software. The government will determine whether to host an Industry Day based on RFI responses. Multiple responses indicate there are no currently funded requirements for system modernization efforts, though cost-saving implementations would be of interest to the government.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| BACN ROBE CLS RFI - Questions and Answers 12102024_Rv1.pdf | ||
| BACN ROBE CLS RFI_20241121.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1. Are there any proprietary components and will the government be providing data packages (e.g., drawings, bill of materials, firmware, software, functional and interface specifications) for these components?
Government Response: The drawings for the following items identified in Question 2 are copyright controlled by Northrop Grumman. The government has data packages for these components and can provide if an RFP is issued.
2. Specifically, are the following commercial or proprietary items, and are data packages available for the bidder’s library and the successful offeror upon contract award?
a. Airborne Executive Processor (AEP) Government Response: The AEP runs SPIDR software, which is government software.
b. USB connection to AEP
c. Network Connection to AEP
d. 1553 Bus monitor to AEP
e. ROBE Gateway Software
f. Mission Command Display Software
g. BCS Software - Government Response:Confirm this refers to “BC3” software? BC3 is a Rockwell Collins commercial product.
The above are not commercial items; they are copyright controlled by Northrop Grumman (with the exception of BC3 software). The government has data packages for these components and can provide if an RFP is issued.
3. Will the government require Contractor to reverse engineer and normalize proprietary systems to mitigate vendor lock and expand the supply chain for sustainment and spares?
Government Response: No.
4. Is the Government interested in a successful bidder assisting in transitioning the ROBE system to an open, modular architecture achievable through identifying COTS/GOTS processors and redesigning system architectures to meet evolving standards, such as ABMS? This effort can be accomplished while maintaining current operational capabilities and ensuring alignment with future requirements.
Government Response: There are no funded requirements at this time (implementing these capabilities as cost-saving measures would be of interest to the government).
5. Does the Government anticipate standardizing a hardware/software interface approach for extending the ROBE capability to other USAF platforms, such as the KC-46, BACN, AWACS, RJ, and E-7, to integrate closed systems across diverse platforms, reducing costs and enhancing interoperability for joint and coalition missions?
Government Response: There are no funded requirements at this time (implementing this standardization as a cost-saving measure would be of interest to the government).
6. What priorities does the Government have for aligning the ROBE system with ABMS standards/architecture and supporting future communication technologies (e.g., AI-enabled decision-making and edge computing)?
Government Response: There are no funded requirements at this time.
7. The KC-46 solution presents a compelling opportunity to adopt an Open Systems Design, enabling enhanced combat capability and reduced life-cycle costs by minimizing proprietary elements and fostering a robust, competitive supply chain. This approach reduces risk of delay or technical challenges associated with integrating legacy systems into a forward-looking architecture. Is the government considering an alternative to separate the two requirements and procure the new capability for KC-46 and then eventually backfit the KC-135 fleet (if needed) with the new system?
Government Response: There are no funded requirements at this time (implementing these capabilities as cost-saving measures would be of interest to the government).
8. Does the government require the contractor to maintain software/firmware for the systems?
Can the government provide a list of the required software?
Government Response: Yes, with the exception of government-controlled SPIDR software. The government has a list of the required software and can provide during the RDP phase.
Commercial software upgrades due end-of-life/end-of-sale are expected.
9. Will the government host/facilitate an Industry Day and/or 1:1 Sessions with the government team to discuss specific elements of the program requirements and potential offering?
Government Response: To be determined based on RFI responses.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .