Round_5_SL B_Addendum_1_2.6.15_FINAL.pdf
PDF 125 KB Posted
- Attached to
- The USAID Globla Health Development Innovation Accelerator Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)
- Solicitation number
- BAA-GLOBALHEALTH-2015
About this file
United States Agency for International Development (USAID) the Government of Norway the Bill Melinda Gates Foundation Grand Challenges Canada and UKs Department of International Development (DFID) have joined together to launch the fifth round of Saving Lives at Birth A Grand Challenge for Development. Together we call for groundbreaking prevention and treatment approaches for pregnant women and newborns in poor hard-to-reach communities around the time of childbirth. The estimated 2.6 million.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Round_5_SL B_Addendum_1_FAQs_2.28.15_FINAL.pdf | ||
| GH_BAA_2.6.15_FINAL.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Saving Lives at Birth: A Grand Challenge for Development Addendum 01 to
The USAID Development Innovation Accelerator Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) for Global Health Challenges
SECTION A. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Program Summary
United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Government of Norway, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Grand Challenges Canada, and UK’s Department of International Development (DFID) have joined together to launch the fifth round of Saving Lives at Birth:
A Grand Challenge for Development.
Together, we call for groundbreaking prevention and treatment approaches for pregnant women and newborns in poor, hard-to-reach communities around the time of childbirth. The estimated 2.6 million stillbirths, 2.9 million neonatal deaths and 287,000 maternal deaths that occur globally each year signal a major gap for intervention specifically around childbirth and the early postnatal period – a time when mothers and babies are most vulnerable and global progress in reducing mortality has been particularly poor. This gap in interventions is particularly acute in poor, underserved communities and among women who are disadvantaged.
Innovative ideas that can leapfrog conventional approaches are critical in this area. If we are to accelerate substantial and sustainable progress in reducing maternal and newborn deaths and stillbirths at the community level- and contribute to the goals and targets of Ending Preventable Maternal Mortality and Every Newborn Action Plan - we need to support and scale innovative prevention and treatment approaches across three main domains:
(1) Science & technology;
(2) Service delivery; and
(3) Demand-side innovation that empowers pregnant women and their families to practice healthy behaviors and be aware of and access health care during pregnancy, childbirth and the early postnatal period, especially the first two days after birth.
We are particularly interested in investing in and supporting approaches that integrate the latest behavior change approaches with scientific and/or technological advances and service delivery platforms into radical solutions for widespread impact on maternal and newborn health. We encourage these ideas that integrate scientific / technological, social and business innovation1 to foster sustainability.
Significant breakthroughs in innovation often come about when new ideas and disciplines are applied to long-entrenched problems. New approaches can transform insurmountable development challenges into solvable problems. To harness this ingenuity, we encourage partnerships that bring together diverse expertise from non-traditional partners, particularly those that include private sector partners. We are calling on for-profit companies, non-governmental organizations, academic/medical research institutions, faith-based organizations, civic groups and foundations across a range of disciplines to take up this challenge.
Diverse partnerships also catalyze successful implementation at scale.
Multidisciplinary/cross-sector teams are encouraged, where necessary, to ensure relevant scientific, social, and business expertise. Engaging private and/or public sector expertise will deploy stronger and more sustainable solutions. Bold ideas also need to be championed by effective, results-driven leaders with the capacity to convene and engage with key influencers. Where partnerships include innovators from low-and middle-income countries, we encourage the partnership to designate the low- and or middle-income country partner as the Project Manager/ Principle Investigator (PI).
Critical to the sustained success of innovative solutions is a clear understanding of how best to implement them at scale. Applicants should take into account country programs, policies, and priorities. Development of new interventions, technologies or approaches and their successful scale up should complement efforts to strengthen health systems and address broader determinants of health including poverty, inequity, gender inequality, and access to water and sanitation resources, all of which are needed to address this grand challenge for development.
Audacious but achievable ideas with the potential to lead to transformational change will be swiftly funded through at least one of three funding streams:
(1) Seed Funds to develop and assess the feasibility of innovative ideas,
(2) Validation Funds to introduce and validate the effectiveness of innovations to reach proof-of-concept, and
(3) Transition Funds to transition innovations with demonstrated proof-of-concept toward scale up.
These investments in potentially high-return projects are aimed to identify and support transformational approaches to women’s and newborns’ health that can be scaled up to dramatically – and sustainably – reduce deaths and poor birth
1 This approach is referred to as Integrated Innovation, for more information visit:
http://www.grandchallenges.ca/integrated-innovation/ outcomes for millions of women and newborns in the hardest to reach communities of the world.
For more information on the Saving Lives at Birth program, please visit our website (www.savinglivesatbirth.net).
Problem Statement
The onset of labor marks the start of a high-risk period for both mother and baby that do not ease until at least 48 hours after birth. During this short period of time, an estimated 145,000 maternal deaths, 1.45 million neonatal deaths, and 1.2 million stillbirths occur annually.
• For the mother, the critical conditions occurring during pregnancy and after labor include hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders such as preeclampsia and eclampsia, serious infections, and obstructed labor.
• For the newborn, the critical conditions occurring after birth are serious infections (sepsis, meningitis, pneumonia, and diarrhea), intrapartum-related deaths (“birth asphyxia”), and complications of preterm birth.
• Important causes of stillbirth include intrapartum asphyxia, maternal and antepartum hemorrhage, fetal bacterial infection, obstructed labor, syphilis, and malaria.
• Important causes of maternal and newborn complications result from births that are spaced too closely.
Almost all of the deaths during this high-risk period occur in low- and middle-income countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, where access to quality care is also the poorest. Evidence-based interventions—such as skilled attendance at delivery; emergency obstetric and newborn care; parenteral administration of drugs; blood transfusions; kangaroo care for newborns; early initiation of breastfeeding; hygiene; and rapid diagnosis and early treatment of infections—do exist to manage complications around the time of birth. However, these interventions are not always available to the women and children who need them. Since many opportunities to optimize birth outcomes occur before and after the time of birth, it is also important to improve women’s access to evidence-based prenatal care, family planning resources (including contraception), birth spacing and delay, proper nutrition, and postnatal care.
In resource-poor settings, care at the time of birth is further impeded by the fact that people often lack material resources, electricity, clean water and adequate transportation to travel to hospitals, and that there are few trained health professionals or facilities capable of providing basic and comprehensive emergency obstetric care. Where trained professionals and facilities exist, quality of care can be further impeded by poor management and supervision, non-functioning supply chains, and lack of adherence to standard guidelines and protocols. Finally, gender norms, cultural beliefs, and traditions that limit a woman’s autonomy and decision making power, may also prevent women and their families from practicing healthy behaviors, and seeking and receiving life-saving care at and around the time of birth.
Taken together, these limitations leave poor, underserved women—who have the greatest geographical, financial and structural challenges in securing quality care at the time of delivery—and their infants at the highest risk of poor pregnancy outcomes.
Objective
For the purposes of this Addendum, the Saving Lives at Birth partners are seeking creative solutions to address roadblocks to healthy pregnancies and births in three major domains, alone or in combination:
• Science & Technology: lack of dissemination and uptake of the most recent scientific evidence applicable delivery of care in low-resource settings; lack of affordable and effective medical solutions appropriate for the community or clinic setting;
• Service Delivery: lack of quality health services, including inadequate numbers of trained, motivated, equipped and properly located and supervised health staff and caregivers; operating without adherence to up-to-date guidelines or evidence-based practices and limited by operational bottlenecks;
• Demand: lack of opportunity, ability, motivation, and empowerment to access health care or adopt healthy behaviors before, during, and after pregnancy.
Since many opportunities to optimize maternal and birth outcomes occur before and after the time of birth, solutions do not need to focus solely on the window between labor and 48 hours post-delivery. Where life-saving interventions exist but have not been successfully deployed or implemented, we invite bold ideas for overcoming specific barriers to scaling up.
What We Are Looking For
Interventions that:
• Substantially increase demand for and access to primary health interventions for women and newborns (for example, by at least 50 percent for interventions with low coverage);
• Substantially improve the quality of care as measured by health outcomes;
and
• Improve and sustain healthy behaviors.
Solutions should:
• Be "off the beaten track," daring in premise, and clearly differentiated from standard practice;
• Enhance uptake, acceptability and provide for sustained use (potential for sustainability as defined as cost-recovery, sustained use, and sustainable impact);
• Be low-cost or highly cost-effective;
• Have a strong likelihood of achieving a substantial impact on one or more important adverse maternal, fetal, or neonatal health conditions described in the problem statement above;
• Be scalable in resource-poor settings; and
• Be able to be monitored, measured and evaluated.
Strong Areas of Interest
We are particularly interested in novel innovations in any of the following areas, but not limited to:
• Approaches to prevent stillbirth and preterm birth, including better monitoring and management of labor
• Approaches targeting individual and collective behaviors and social norms
(particularly gender inequality) to increase access, uptake and retention in antenatal care, facility based labor and delivery and postnatal care, including healthy timing and spacing of pregnancies through family planning and postpartum family planning, early initiation of breastfeeding, Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission (PMTCT) of HIV and other HIV/AIDS prevention, care and treatment services for pregnant women, infants and children.
• Programs to assess and address the challenges of approaches or technologies proven to work in high-income settings but unproven in low-income settings such as antenatal steroids, progesterone, etc
• Simple, low-cost technologies adapted or designed for use in hard-to-reach, low-resource settings (e.g., simpler or portable technologies for newborn resuscitation, identification and care of preterm and low-birth weight newborns, infection management, prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage, etc)
• Mechanisms to improve referral and transportation of mothers with complications and sick newborns
• Ways that Information and Communication Technology (ICT) can be used to improve health, healthcare delivery, and accountability for maternal and newborn health in low-resource areas in new, measurable, low-cost and integrated ways.
• Interventions that reduce barriers to accessing or receiving appropriate treatment and evidence-based care, including those that increase coverage of care around the time of birth and target specific health system bottlenecks
• Solutions that recognize the critical roles of the end-user in the development process.
• Solutions that include co-funding from partners is encouraged, as this demonstrates a key stake in project success by project partners, as well as demand for the solution
We encourage integrated solutions that bring together cutting-edge science and/or low-cost technologies, service delivery, and demand innovation in transformative new ways.
Innovation Pipeline
The Partners seek solutions across the three stages of development (seed, validation, or transition) described below. Under this Addendum, the Partners will place a greater focus on identifying and supporting innovations to reach scale.
Seed Funds
• Focus: Seed funds will be provided to support the development and feasibility assessment of ideas capable of impacting health outcomes for pregnant women and their babies in low-resource settings. It is anticipated that projects aiming to develop early-stage prototyes and/or conduct feasibility assessments, including those for scientific advancements, will enter the Saving Lives at Birth program at this stage.
• Funding: Funding levels will correspond to the scope and scale of the innovation but will generally be $250,000 USD per project.
• Length of Award: Seed projects will be funded for up to two (2) years.
Validation Funds
• Focus: Validation funds will be provided to support the introduction and validation of prototypes and innovative approaches in achieving promising health outcomes for pregnant women and their babies in low-resource settings (i.e. reaching proof of concept).
• Eligibility: Proposed solutions for validation funds may have been preliminarily tested (but previous data is not required), but should not be current standard practice; however, innovative variations on existing approaches may be considered (e.g., a new means to deliver an existing service or a new way to make an old model demonstrably more effective or cost effective). Previous Saving Lives at Birth seed awardees are eligible to apply. However, applicants do not need a previous seed award to be eligible for validation funds.
• Funding: Funding levels will correspond to the scope and scale of the innovation but will generally be $250,000 USD per project.
• Length of Award: Validation projects will be funded for up to two (2) years.
Transition Funds
• Focus: Transition awards are intended to further develop, refine and rigorously test the impact of integrated solutions that have strong evidence in a controlled or limited setting of promising health outcome(s) and/or the reduction of significant barrier(s) to health and demand for the solution. These integrated solutions have the potential to credibly scale to improve the lives of millions of pregnant women and newborns in multiple countries.
• Eligibility: Projects for transition funds must have strong evidence in a controlled or limited setting of promising health outcome(s) and/or the reduction of significant barrier(s) to health (i.e., proof of concept) and demand for the solution to warrant expanded support. Submissions must provide sufficient and credible evidence to demonstrate their proof of concept and the link to positive impact on maternal and newborn health. Without sufficent evidence, prospective partners should consider submitting an expression of interest for another type of award (seed or validation). Transition Funds will be limited to integrated solutions only (approaches that integrate science and technology, service delivery, and demand creation domains in innovative ways). All three components (science and technology, service delivery, and demand creation) do not need to be novel; the innovation may rest in the integration of the components that enhances the effect on improved birth outcomes over that of each component in isolation. Note that components should be integrated in a meaningful and complementary manner, merely combining three stand-alone components into one project is not considered an integrated solution. A key component of achieving sustainability and scale is partnerships. Reviewers will look for partnerships that contribute expertise relevant to the scale and sustainability of the idea. Co-funding from partners is encouraged, as this demonstrates a key stake in project success by project partners, as well as demand for the solution.
• Funding: Funding levels will correspond to the scope and scale of the innovation but will not exceed $2 million USD per project.
o Some innovations may require testing at various levels (local, regional, and across several regions) in the transition stage. Strong justification should be made as to how the scale of implementation corresponds to the scope of the project.
• Length of Award: Transition awards will be funded for up to four (4) years.
SECTION B: SUBMISSION GUIDELINES AND INSTRUCTIONS
Submission Overview and Timeline
Expressions of Interest must indicate the research or development idea which will work towards discovering potential solutions with impact upon the Objective, above, by increasing knowledge and understanding of potential solutions and their implementation at scale, utilizing scientific discoveries or advancements in technology, processes, methods, devices, or techniques, advancing the state of the art, or using scientific and technical knowledge in the design, development, testing, or evaluation of a potential new product or service (or of an improvement in an existing product or service). The following are instructions for how proposals shall be submitted and reviewed.
1. Expressions of Interest (EOI) shall be submitted by March 27, 2015 2:00 p.m.
EST.
2. Beginning mid-February, EOIs shall be submitted electronically via www.savinglivesatbirth.net/apply. More guidance and instructions on submission can be found on our website. For all submissions, it is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that files are complete and transmitted by the deadline. The applicant bears full responsibility for data errors or omissions.
3. If initial review indicates the EOI merits further consideration , selected organizations or consortia may be invited, individually or in combination, to discuss their proposals with the Saving Lives at Birth partners. This process may result in applicants being invited to submit concept notes and attend the DevelopmentXChange in Washington, DC July 21-22, 2015.
DevelomentXChange: To take advantage of the presence of a variety of development actors together in one place, the Partners will host the DevelopmentXChange in Washington, DC (estimated to be July 21-22, 2015).
Finalists will display their innovations/innovative ideas in an open marketplace.
As part of this event, finalists will have the opportunity to network with each other, with other development experts and innovators, and other potential funders. Finalists will also participate in a series of workshops tailored to the participants’ needs such as business planning, fundraising and monitoring and evaluation. The Partners will cover the cost for one representative from each finalist team to attend the DevelopmentXChange. Only one representative may attend the closed sessions of the DevelopmentXChange.
4. Validation and final selection An Executive Committee or Governing Board for each of the respective funding mechanisms will independently review and validate the panel recommendations to ensure consistency with applicable policies, procedures and practices of the respective funding organization, inclusive of past performance evaluation. As per the BAA, the Partners may engage in co-designing the project and assisting the partner to provide additional information with respect to the proposer’s technical approach, capacity, management and organization, partnerships and resources, past performance, and budget, as well as representations and certifications, as needed. The final decision regarding awards is the responsibility of the respective funding organization.
Unsuccessful Projects: Applicants with unsuccessful projects will receive notice that their project was not selected.
Information Protection
Saving Lives at Birth’s goal is to identify and scale up transformative prevention and treatment approaches for pregnant women and newborns around the time of birth. Understanding the sensitive nature of submitters’ information, USAID will work with organizations to protect intellectual property.
Expressions of Interest should be free of any intellectual property that the submitter wishes to protect, as the EOI will be shared with Saving Lives at Birth partners as part of the selection process. However, once submitters have been invited to engage in further discussions, submitters will work with USAID to identify proprietary information that requires protection.
Therefore, organizations making submissions under the BAA Addendum hereby grant USAID a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use, disclose, reproduce, and prepare derivative works, and to have or permit others to do so to any information contained in the expressions of interest submitted under the BAA Addendum. As noted above, if Saving Lives at Birth engages further with the organization regarding its submission, the parties can negotiate intellectual property protection for the organization’s intellectual property.
Organizations must ensure that any submissions under the Addendum are free of any third party proprietary data rights that would impact the license granted to USAID herein.
Submission Instructions
Submitters should use the following instructions and follow the simplified submission format.
• All EOI must be written in English. EOI should be written clearly and with minimal jargon as reviewers will possess a variety of backgrounds and technical expertise.
• The EOI must be no longer than 3 pages. Any charts or tables included with the EOI will be considered within the page limits. References and citations to academic publications or other resources are not required but are encouraged. If included as a separate page as end notes, references and citations are not included in the page limits. Biographical descriptions and letters of support are not included in the stated page limits.
• All EOI must use a standard font no smaller than11-point font with one-inch margins.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the submission instructions and format found at: www.savinglivesatbirth.net/apply. This guidance includes presentation instructions for the technical application andsupporting information (biographical descriptions and letters of support)
Competitive applications will address:
• The anticipated results to be achieved within the lifetime of the award
• The potential scale the innovation could reach
• The context in which the solution will be delivered (e.g., the user’s needs and wants; community characteristics; connectivity with health authorities and existing health facilities; local leadership, government and civil society buy-in)
• How the solution will have a substantial impact on maternal and newborn health, including how the solution will (or can) be adapted to new environments for even greater impact
• Previous demonstrated proof-of-concept, if applicable
• How the solution will be delivered/administered (e.g., frequency of service, personnel, etc.)
• How the solution will improve upon the best existing alternative(s) available today and/or standard practice
• How the solution will (or can) integrate science and low-cost technology, service delivery and demand
• How the solution addresses underlying determinants of seeking maternal healthcare
• How the solution will work to avoid potentially harmful unintended consequences as applicable
• How the organization is positioned to carry out the work successfully (including organizational and financial sustainability)
• The commitment of partners that contribute expertise relevant to the scale and sustainability of the idea as applicable
• The duration of the time required to implement proposed solution
• A concrete plan for measuring, evaluating, and sharing results
• How the solution addresses determinants of health, public policies, and other ethical / social / cultural / legal frameworks that could limit uptake
• How the solution incorporates financial models or business systems to develop and deliver the solution affordably and sustainably
Evaluation Criteria
Seed, Validation, and Transition proposals will be evaluated in separate tracks based on the following criteria. Pioneering innovation is significantly more important than the other technical criteria.
The final award selection will be based on a combination of technical strength, cost, and pioneering innovation.
1. Innovation Demonstration that the proposed solution offers a creative approach to the problem outlined in the challenge and is clearly differentiated from existing approaches.
2. Sustained Impact Demonstration that the proposed solution is relevant to the problem outlined in the challenge and potentially transformative, with attention to how impact achieved could be sustained following the end of Saving Lives at Birth support.
3. Execution Extent to which the proposed project objectives and interim milestones are appropriate, feasible and technically sound within the budget and time allocated for either seed, validation or transition funding.
4. Evaluation Plan Extent to which the project has proposed a clear, measurable and realistic monitoring and evaluation plan, including attention to key indicators relevant to Saving Lives at Birth.
5. Organizational Capacity and Partnerships Demonstration that the applicant and its partners have the necessary depth and breadth of talent, experience and leadership in order to execute their project.
6. Pioneering Proposals with highest potential to achieve sustainable, groundbreaking impact and/or to become true game changers in the field.
| Program Summary |
| Problem Statement |
| Objective |
| What We Are Looking For |
| Strong Areas of Interest |
| Submission Overview and Timeline |
| Information Protection |
| Submission Instructions |
| Evaluation Criteria |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .