B11 MISC (Past Performance Questionnaire - Attachment 5).doc

DOC document 31 KB Posted

Attached to
35234 - St. Croix Shores Boathouse - Stairs Projec
Solicitation number
140P6021R0006
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a contractor performance evaluation template and details of a related federal contract opportunity. The template appears to be used for evaluating a contractor's performance on past projects and includes questions about schedule adherence, quality of work, communication, and responsiveness to changed requirements. Ratings are on a scale of 1 to 10 with space for comments.

The related federal contract opportunity is for the St. Croix Shores Boathouse Stairs Project with the Department of the Interior National Park Service Midwest Region. The solicitation number is provided along with the name and description of the project. No other details are given about response dates, award dates, pricing terms, set asides, or incumbent.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Date____________________ Contractor Name _____________________________ Project Title/Description___________________________________

Contract Type [ ] RFQ [ ] Sealed Bid [ ] Fixed Price [ ] Negotiated

Contract Period ________________________ Cost Original ________________ Current/Final ________________

1. Was the project completed within the allotted time? [ ] Yes [ ] No

2. How effective was the contractor with establishment

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A and execution of the schedule?

3. Contractor’s adherence to plans and specifications

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

4. Submission of documents and reports (submittals)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

5. Standards of workmanship/quality

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

6. Completion of final punch-list

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

7. Supervision

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

8. Communication, coordination and cooperation (CO, COTR, etc.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

9. Was the contractor fair/reasonable regarding equitable

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A adjustments and cost proposals in response to changed work requirements?

OTHER COMMENTS

Interviewed by:__________________________________________

Email:

Phone:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .