B08_Solicitation_140P6024Q0063_(Attachment_3_PPQ).doc
DOC document 100 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CUSTODIAL SERVICE
- Solicitation number
- 140P6024Q0063
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) related to a federal contract opportunity for Custodial Services at the Brown vs Board of Education National Historic Park in Topeka, Kansas.
The solicitation number is 140P6024Q0063, and it is a total small business set-aside under NAICS code 561720 (Janitorial Services) with a $22.0 million size standard. The contract will be a firm-fixed-price award for a base period of 6 months and an option period of 6 months. The period of performance is anticipated to be September 15, 2024 to March 14, 2025. The contracting agency is the Department of the Interior, National Park Service Midwest Region. The PPQ requests information on the offeror's past performance, including their relationship with the client, quality control, schedule compliance, and customer satisfaction. The questionnaire must be completed and returned by the specified deadline for the offeror's proposal to be considered.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Department of Interior
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service is considering the company listed below in Section A for a project opportunity - Your comments would be appreciated regarding this company’s past performance.
Instructions:
1) The offeror is to complete only the information in Section A, then send the entire past performance questionnaire to project owner/evaluator for completion.
2) The project owner/evaluator (or reference) is to complete Section B, then send the entire past performance questionnaire back to the offeror to be provided with their complete proposal package, which will then be reviewed for evaluation.
3) The past performance questionnaire must be received by the contracting point of contact by the date and time specified in the solicitation (or any amendments). Please note that for electronic submissions, offerors should consider and account for potential delays in transmissions between when an electronic submission is submitted and when an electronic submission is received. Late past performance questionnaires will not be accepted.
4) One past performance questionnaire is to be used for each past performance project submitted. The offeror may submit between 3-5 past performance questionnaires for this solicitation. Past performance projects must have been completed within five years of the completion of performance of the evaluated contract or order.
Section A
Project Title:
Location:
Description:
| Company Name: |
| Unique Entity ID/Cage Code: |
| Owner/Project Manager Name: |
| Email Address: |
| Start Date: |
| Completion Date: |
| Initial Amount: |
| Final Amount: |
Section B
Evaluator
| Evaluator Name: |
| Company/Agency Name: |
| Address: |
| POC Email: |
Position Held or Function in Relation to Project:
Ratings Overview
Rating: If the rating is Marginal or Unacceptable, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.
| “O” |
| Outstanding |
| Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements. |
| “A” |
| Above Average |
| Performance exceeded the contract requirements. |
| “S” |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance met the contract requirements. |
| “M” |
| Marginal |
| Performance met the minimum contract requirements but |
Some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory.
| “U” |
| Unacceptable |
| Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements. |
Questionnaire
Please select the appropriate rating and provide supporting information for the following questions.
| 1. The relationship between the company and client’s/customer’s contract team: |
| O |
FORMCHECKBOX
A
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
M
FORMCHECKBOX
U
FORMCHECKBOX
2. Overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness, and cooperative conduct:
O
FORMCHECKBOX
A
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
M
FORMCHECKBOX
U
3. Quality control:
O
FORMCHECKBOX
A
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
M
FORMCHECKBOX
U
4. Ability to meet the performance schedule:
O
FORMCHECKBOX
A
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
M
FORMCHECKBOX
U
5. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain:
Yes
FORMCHECKBOX
No
6. Would you award another contract to the company being evaluated? If no, please explain:
Yes
No
| 7. Was the customer satisfied with the final product and services? If no, please explain: |
| Yes |
No
8. Has the firm being evaluated been provided an opportunity to discuss or respond to any negative comments or performance ratings? If so, what were the results?
Yes
FORMCHECKBOX
No
9. Overall Rating
O
A
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
M
FORMCHECKBOX
U
10. Comments
Evaluator Signature
Name
Date:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .