B08_Relevant_Project_Experience_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P8326Q0002
About this file
The document is a Relevant Project Experience Questionnaire for Solicitation 140P8326Q0002, designed to capture contractor project history for a North Cascade National Park road maintenance contract. The questionnaire requires detailed responses across seven key areas, including project description, performance details, contractor roles, price changes, schedule modifications, problem resolution, and successful methods. Contractors must provide comprehensive information about previous projects demonstrating relevant experience, with specific attention to how past work aligns with the current road maintenance requirements.
The associated federal contract opportunity is a small business set-aside for Stehekin Road Maintenance at North Cascade National Park, with a base period from 2/01/2026-1/30/2027. The contract, under NAICS code 488490, requires the contractor to provide labor, tools, equipment, materials, and supervision for road maintenance services. The solicitation closes on 1/21/2026 at 5:00 pm PST, with questions accepted until 1/07/2026 at noon PST. Contractors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to award, and the contract will be a firm-fixed price commercial services agreement.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B03_Wage_Determination_Chelan_Dougles.pdf | ||
| A05_2025_road_maintenance_SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_140P8326Q0002.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Relevant Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P8326Q0003
Submit responses to the questions below that demonstrate your relevant experience successfully completing projects of a similar nature and scope as this requirement per the instructions in the Solicitation. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Period of Performance: |
| MM/DD/YYYY – MM/DD/YYYY |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
Choose an item.
Choose an item.
Choose an item.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .