B08_-_Attachment_A_-_SOW.pdf

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 1

ATTACHMENT A

SECTION 2.0

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

2.1 BACKGROUND

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) wants to identify sand and sediment resources for coastal resilience and potential critical mineral deposits at Ship Shoal located on the Outer Continental Shelf Louisiana through geophysical and geological (G&G) investigations. The investigation will support the National Offshore Sand Inventory (NOSI) and the National Offshore Critical Minerals Inventory (NOCMI). The area of interest includes Ship Shoal and surrounding area (see Figures 1 and 2 in Attachment 1). The figures in Attachment 1 identify the modeled shoals, the Submerged Lands Act Boundary, existing core sample locations and survey tracklines, and the Gulf Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) blocks with Significant Sediment Resources. The focus is to expand the current knowledge of the Ship Shoal Sediment Management Area.

The overall effort includes development of G&G investigation plans, acquisition of data, identification and volumetric evaluation of resources, critical mineral analysis, and submission of reports and data formatted for ingestion into the Marine Minerals Information System (MMIS).

2.2 OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this Firm-Fixed-Price contract are to identify, characterize, and document offshore sand, sediment, and potential critical mineral resources located in the Ship Shoal Sediment Management Area through a task-based program of planning, geophysical surveying, core collection, laboratory testing, data evaluation, and reporting.

2.3. SCOPE OF WORK

The Contractor shall furnish all labor, supervision, management, vessels, equipment, materials, supplies, software, transportation, and incidentals necessary to perform the tasks described in this SOW. The required work includes, at a minimum: development of one geophysical, geotechnical and Critical Mineral investigation plan; acquisition of 500 line-miles of geophysical survey data (CHIRP and Boomer), bathymetric data including the seafloor reflectivity data, magnetometer, and side scan sonar data.; collection of 35 vibracores (30 foot preferred); with the option of collecting 10 borings with a minimum penetration of 50 feet; analysis of 140 vibracore samples and collection of 70 samples for critical mineral analysis. The Contractor shall prepare a single final report for the standard geophysical and geotechnical results and the initial sand body volumetrics (see Attachment 2). The Contractor shall prepare an additional report for the critical mineral analysis (see Attachment 3). The digital data deliverables shall be submitted to BOEM in the required format outlined below.

The Contractor shall perform the work in accordance with the current versions of all applicable federal, state, and industry standards and requirements identified in the contract. At a minimum, the work shall comply with the following, as applicable:

• BOEM Notice to Lessees (NTL) No. 2005-G07 for archaeological survey considerations.

• ISO 19901 requirements for marine soil investigation, as applicable to the work performed.

• FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (CSDGM) and ISO 19115 metadata standards, as appropriate for the dataset.

• USGS Science Data Lifecycle Model, including planning, acquisition, preservation, and data delivery considerations.

• ASTM D5434-25 for core logging, ASTM D2487-17(R2025) for USCS classification, ASTM

D4648/D4648M-24a for Field Miniature Vane Shear testing, and ASTM D6913/D6913M-17R25 for

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 2 sieve analysis. The measurements obtained using a pocket shear vane/Torvane are acceptable when consistent with the applicable testing requirements in this SOW.

• BOEM naming conventions, and MMIS schema and data requirements, as provided by the Government.

2.4 TASKS

2.4.1 Task 1 Project Management

Provide overall project management, coordination, and administrative oversight necessary to support successful execution of the contract.

2.4.1.1 Project Management

a) The Contractor shall provide all project management, coordination, and planning necessary to perform the work under this contract.

b) The Contractor shall attend a kickoff meeting with the Government to confirm project objectives, schedule, deliverables, communication procedures, data standards, and roles and responsibilities.

c) The Contractor shall provide regular project status updates to the COR throughout contract performance and shall identify any actual or potential schedule delays, performance issues, or risks affecting successful performance.

2.4.1.2 Project Management Plan

a) The Contractor shall prepare and submit a Project Management Plan (PMP) for Government review and acceptance.

b) The PMP shall describe, at a minimum, the Contractor’s management approach, project organization, key personnel, communication procedures, quality control procedures, schedule management, risk management approach, subcontractor coordination, and procedures for tracking deliverables, issues, and corrective actions.

c) The PMP shall describe how the Contractor will coordinate with BOEM and maintain project records throughout contract performance.

Deliverables

1. Project Management Plan (PMP) (Word and PDF format)

2. Quarterly Status updates and coordination records, and issue tracking documentation, as requested by the COR

3. Weekly Updates during active field operations

2.4.2 Task 2 Mobilization, Notices, and Field Coordination

Complete all pre-field coordination, investigation plans, and mobilization actions required to perform the approved surveys and coring program.

Subtasks

2.4.2.1 Coordination with Maritime Authorities

The Contractor shall contact appropriate maritime authorities prior to field work to satisfy reporting and notice requirements. At a minimum, notice of pending activities shall be made through the U.S. Coast Guard Local Notice to Mariners and the U.S. Department of War, no less than seventy-two (72) hours prior to commencement of all sand survey activities, unless a different authority requires more stringent notice.

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 3

2.4.2.2

The Contractor shall identify the survey vessel call sign and preferred communication channel in operational notices.

a) The Contractor shall meet with BOEM within forty-eight (48) hours of the start of data collection in person or virtually to review, align, and finalize all field investigation logistics, safety protocols, and operational procedures, and keep the COR informed of field work progress (Geophysical surveys and coring) via emails to MMUGulf@BOEM.gov and via virtual meetings as needed. If any collection issues arise, BOEM should be notified immediately to discuss a resolution.

b) The Contractor shall follow all BOEM required mitigation protocols and procedures during field survey and sampling activities.

Deliverables

1. Copies of required notices or evidence of submission.

2. Field coordination records, emails, and meeting logs.

2.4.3 Task 3 Geophysical Surveys

Conduct geophysical surveys to acquire data sufficient to identify geomorphic and geologic features, support archaeological clearance for coring, and support interpretation of offshore sand, sediment, and potential critical mineral resources.

2.4.3.1

The contractor shall conduct a geophysical survey to include 500 line-miles of geophysical survey tracklines to identify geomorphic and geologic features within the area of interest.

a) Geophysical surveys shall be conducted as approved in the Project Management Plan. The objective of the geophysical field surveys is to capture the base of the sand body. The geophysical field surveys shall concurrently collect seismic reflection profile CHIRP, Boomer, bathymetric data including the seafloor reflectivity data, magnetometer, and side scan sonar data. Note that a magnetometer or gradiometer is acceptable, provided the data are sufficient to clear proposed core locations and meet the RFQ data-delivery requirements. The extent of the geophysical survey shall be determined by BOEM in cooperation with the contractor.

2.4.3.2

The collected geophysical data shall be processed and interpreted to support the search, identification, and characterization of sand and sediment resources. Processed geophysical profiles and interpretations shall be incorporated into the respective geotechnical data report and shall meet the data requirements of the Marine Minerals Information System (MMIS). The quality of the data collection shall include all means and methods necessary to provide the following:

a) Data and information products must be of sufficient quality, whether geophysical or geological, to identify resource morphology, character, quantity, quality, and geologic setting. The quality of the collected data shall also meet the requirements for conducting an archaeological clearance survey to identify any potential archaeological resources along the geophysical survey tracklines (as noted in BOEM Notice to Lessees (NTL) No. 2005-G07), and in accordance with the International Standardization Organization’s (ISO) 19901 requirements for marine soil investigation and ISO 19115 metadata format.

mailto:MMUGulf@BOEM.gov

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 4

b) The preservation of the data shall ensure long-term viability and accessibility consistent with the USGS Science Data Lifecycle Model. Any data collected for geophysical and geological vibracore sampling will be required to meet organization, formatting, documenting, and submittal requirements of digital data as described below.

c) The Contractor shall submit all spatial data referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) and the Louisiana State Plane Coordinate System. Geospatial data can be submitted in a Geographic Coordinate System or in projected Coordinate System if approved by BOEM for the data type and locality. Vertical data shall be reported relative to NAVD88.

d) The Contractor shall adhere to agreed upon file naming conventions for each data type being acquired and provide all collected geophysical survey data following the specifications below:

a. Navigation Data

The navigation post-plot of the surveyed area including survey lines, line numbers or other designations, navigational shot points or event markers, and other relevant attributes shall be submitted to the Government in an ArcGIS readable format (e.g., Microsoft Excel (.xls), Comma separated value (.csv), Text file (.txt), Database (.dbf) or Shapefile (.shp)).

b. Survey Area Location and Proposed Project Elements

The survey area location and proposed project elements including relevant attributes shall be submitted in an ArcGIS readable format (e.g., Microsoft Excel (.xls), Comma separated value (.csv), Text file (.txt), Database (.dbf) or Shapefile (.shp)).

c. Magnetometer or Gradiometer Data

The information used to create a table of magnetic anomalies and charting of magnetic anomalies shall be submitted in an ArcGIS readable format (e.g., Microsoft Excel (.xls), Comma separated value (.csv), Text file (.txt), Database (.dbf) or Shapefile (.shp)). The following attributes shall be included in the table of magnetic anomalies:

● Anomaly ID

● Survey Area/Block

● Survey line number

● Instrument

● Raw Magnetic Readings for each instrument, and indication of which instrument is reading from (peak signal strength (gammas))

● Reference field used (if reporting anomaly data)

● Gamma intensity of each identified anomaly (peak gradient amplitude)

● Duration (m)

● Characterization of the anomaly as a dipole, positive (+) or negative (-) monopole, or complex signature, based on the magnetic traces

● Sensor Altitude (for each instrument): instrument height above the seafloor

● Date in YYYY-MM-DD, in UTC Time, exact date the anomaly was recorded

● Time in hh:mm:ss, in UTC Time, exact time the anomaly was recorded

● Coordinate System

● Datum

● Horizontal position, Longitude (Easting) / Latitude (Northing), indicated as coordinates of the interpreted location of each unidentified anomaly in decimal degrees to 6 decimal places, based on magnetic traces and contoured data

● Vertical position, indicated as estimated depth using half-width rule, Euler equation, or other

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 5 means as described in the methodology section

● Association with side scan sonar contacts or sub-bottom (boomer, chirp, and sparker) profiler features

● Recommended avoidance distance, if applicable

Additionally, the complete, unprocessed magnetometer or gradiometer dataset shall also be submitted.

This shall include the unprocessed data for each individual total field magnetometer instrument in the gradiometer configuration, if applicable. These data shall be submitted in a tabular data format recognized by ArcGIS (i.e., Comma separated value (.csv), Text file (.txt), Database (.dbf) or Shapefile (.shp)). At a minimum, the following items shall be included within the data table(s):

● Easting/Longitude

● Northing/Latitude

● Time, in UTC

● Raw Magnetic Readings for each instrument

● Gradiometer Altitude

● Survey Line Number/Name

Each of these components must occupy a single field within the table. For example, easting or longitude data must be within a single column in the data table. This would include a column for an easting amount, or longitude in decimal degrees, not a table with separate columns for degrees and another for decimal minutes.

d. Bathymetric Data

Bathymetric data products shall be submitted in an ArcGIS readable format (e.g., ESRI raster with (X, Y, and Z values), bathymetric grid (BAG), and comma separated value (.csv) XYZ The horizontal data will be provided in the relevant State Plane Coordinate system (North American Datum 1983). Vertical data will be provided in the NAVD88, U.S. survey feet, unless otherwise specified. The Contractor must submit a methods section and results of the uncertainty analysis, field notes, and metadata to BOEM with the processed bathymetric data products. Raw, unprocessed sonar files as well as post-processed sonar files and ancillary data (e.g., sound velocity profiles data, sound velocity profile coordinates with date and time stamp) must also be submitted.

e. Side-Scan Sonar Data

Both raw and processed eXtended Triton Format (.xtf) line files or other formats approved by the Government for the survey shall be submitted, as well as mosaics. Side scan sonar mosaics of the survey area shall be prepared as a geo-referenced Tagged Image Format (.tif) and output as 0.5 m resolution or better. A georeferenced Raster shall also be delivered in XYA format.

The information used to create the table of side scan sonar contacts and mapping of sonar contacts or habitat features shall be submitted in an ArcGIS readable format (e.g., Microsoft Excel (.xls), Comma separated value (.csv), Text file (.txt), Database (.dbf) or Shapefile (.shp)). The following attributes shall be included:

● Side-scan sonar contact ID

● Survey Area/Block

● Survey line number

● Target length (ft, m)

● Target width (ft, m)

● Target height (ft, m)

● Target shadow (ft, m)

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 6

● Target description

● Associated magnetic anomalies

● NAD 83 coordinates of the target in decimal degrees to 5 decimal places

● Original source file name

● Recommended avoidance distance, if applicable

f. Sub-bottom Profiler Data

Sub-bottom profiler data shall be submitted in SEG-Y standard exchange format (.sgy) with navigation included in an industry standard format. Formatting may include image plots and fence diagrams showing the identified horizons or reflectors, XYZ data files, or CSF files compatible with software approved by the Government.

The contractor shall conduct the Compressed High-Intensity Radiated Pulse (CHIRP) sub-bottom survey in the target area for the purpose of identifying acoustic reflectors that define stratigraphic changes within a minimum of the upper 50 ft (15 m) of shallow surface sediment and capable of resolving bedding of less than 0.66 ft (0.2 m). The contractor shall conduct the Boomer/Sparker sub-bottom survey in the target area for the purpose of identifying acoustic reflectors that define stratigraphic changes within a minimum of the upper 150 ft (45 m) of shallow surface sediment and capable of resolving bedding of less than 2 ft (0.6 m). The expectation of the geophysical survey is to resolve the base of the sand bodies and underlying stratigraphy, provide a view of the internal structure of the sand bodies and provide sufficient data to clear core locations.

g. GIS Data

All GIS submitted in a standard Geographic Information Systems (GIS) ESRI format, preferably an ESRI geodatabase. Other spatial or GIS formats are also acceptable, provided they are interoperable with industry standard software.

Data used to illustrate the horizontal and vertical extent of geomorphic features, or geologic units, shall be submitted in an ArcGIS readable format.

BOEM recommends that, where applicable, geospatial data products are submitted in an ESRI geodatabase that follows the current MMIS schema available for download at https://mmis.boem.gov/https://mmis.doi.gov/boemmmis/.

h. Metadata

For each dataset and data product submitted, the Contractor shall prepare and submit associated metadata in accordance with the appropriate FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (CSDGM) or International Standardization Organization’s (ISO) 19115 metadata format (e.g. ISO 19115 metadata standard for imagery or gridded data, Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (version 2.0), FGDC-STD-001-1998, Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS), FGDC-STD-018-2012).

Metadata shall be included as a crucial component for any use or reuse of data. FGDC standards apply to and are mandatory for Federal agencies, as described in OMB Circulars A-16 and A-119 and Executive Order 12906 - Coordinating Geographic Data Acquisition and Access: The National Spatial Data Infrastructure.

FGDC endorsed standards can be found at https://www.fgdc.gov/standards/list.

https://mmis.boem.gov/ https://mmis.doi.gov/boemmmis/ https://www.fgdc.gov/standards/list

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 7

2.4.3.3

Preliminary review of the geophysical data shall be submitted to BOEM’s GOAR RE for review 90 days after completion of data collection. BOEM’s GOAR RE will review the preliminary geophysical draft products and provide comments to the contractor prior to vibracore selection process.

2.4.3.4

The contractor shall coordinate with BOEM to identify proposed vibracoring locations based on post-survey analysis to corroborate the geophysical survey interpretation. The determination of final vibracore locations will require coordination with the contractor’s archaeologist and BOEM’s GOAR OE archaeologist. Vibracore placement shall be along geophysical lines that have been cleared for archaeological resources by a qualified marine archaeologist, and where no known hardbottom resources exists. Based on the geophysical data and archaeological clearance, the final vibracore locations shall be determined and the investigation plans shall be finalized and submitted to the BOEM GOAR RE for final approval.

Deliverables

1. One (1) Final geological investigation plans (pdf format)

2. Meetings, emails, and logs with COR during field work.

3. Raw and processed geophysical datasets in the contractually required formats.

4. Navigation post-plots and survey area/project element GIS files.

5. Daily or periodic field updates during active survey operations.

2.4.4 Task 4 Core Collection and Sampling

Collect vibracore and boring data sufficient to characterize sediment units, support laboratory testing, and validate geophysical interpretations.

Subtasks 2.4.4.1

35 cores shall be collected using vibracore drilling apparatus having a continuous 20-30 foot (ft) core barrel (30 foot preferred) that is advanced until a depth of 20-30 ft is reached or refusal is encountered. An option of 10 borings or cores shall be collected to a minimum depth of 50 feet. The objective of the geotechnical survey is to characterize the sediment body from surface to base and underlying stratigraphy. Refusal is defined as “no additional penetration of the vibracore within two minutes of additional effort applied to penetrate through the resistant layer at maximum vibration.” Each vibracore shall have 80% recovery. The contractor must make at a minimum three attempts to achieve 80% recovery and keep the vibracore with the largest recovery. Contractor shall notify BOEM MMU contact in the event that 80% recovery is not possible due to reasons other than refusal or if borings cannot not be taken to at least 50 feet.

All boring locations (xyz) shall be surveyed using Real Time Kinematic (RTK) GPS in North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) and North American vertical Datum (NAVD88). Emphasis shall be placed on obtaining correct elevations of the boring locations. Corrected water depth measurements shall also be obtained, reported, and incorporated to ensure accurate determination of the true elevation at each boring location.

a) The vibracores shall be cut into one-meter sections, photographed, placed into the standard cardboard or PVC core boxes. The core borings shall be logged according to Advancing Standards Transforming Markets (ASTM) D 5434-25 at the contractor’s facility by a geologist. The draft logs are to be electronically submitted to the COR and the MMUGulf@boem.gov email box for sample selection.

Core boxes shall be labeled with project name, county, date, boring name, and depths interval on top and sides of the boxes.

mailto:MMUGulf@boem.gov

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 8

b) The borings or cores shall be cut into two-meter sections, photographed, placed into the standard cardboard or PVC core boxes. The core borings shall be logged according to Advancing Standards Transforming Markets (ASTM) D 5434-25 at the contractor’s facility by a licensed geologist. The draft logs are to be electronically submitted to the COR and the MMUGulf@boem.gov email box for sample selection. Core boxes shall be labeled with project name, county, date, boring name, and depths interval on top and sides of the boxes.

c) Prior to disturbance via sampling, split vibracores and borings shall be photographed with scale, against an 18% gray background, under indirect insolation in natural light. Photographs shall include the vibracore or boring unique identifier.

d) Clay Testing - Field Miniature Vane Shear Test are to be conducted during vibracore or boring logging in accordance with ASTM Standard Test Methods of Laboratory Miniature Vane Shear Test for Saturated Fine-Grained Clayey Soil (D 4648/D 4648M-24a). For bidding purposes, a total of 140 samples shall be selected and analyzed. The lab testing parameters are listed in Table 1. The measurements obtained using a pocket shear vane/Torvane are acceptable when consistent with the applicable testing requirements in this SOW.

e) Sand/Sediment Testing - One sample for each lithological change and one sample every 2-3 ft for presumed beach compatible sand layers shall be selected for lab analyses. The lab testing parameters are listed in Table 1.

f) Sand/Sediment Testing - All samples will be analyzed for Laser Particle Size Analysis, visual shell % determination, and Munsell color determination (wet, dry, washed). Carbonate Content analysis using the non-ASTM method (Twenhofel-Tyler method) shall be performed on 10% of the samples.

g) Contractor should use proper sampling protocols and standards to make core sampling decisions in real time.

Table 1. Summary of Core Sample Testing

Laboratory Testing Number of Tests

Sieve Analysis (Using Sieve Sizes No. 2 ½”, 1 ¼”, 3/4", 3/8", 3.5, 4, 5, 7, 10, 14, 18, 25, 35, 45, 60, 80, 120, 170, 200, 230) - ASTM D 6913/D

6913M-17R25 140

Visual Percent Shell 140

Field Miniature Vane Shear Test 140

Visual Percent Shell 140

Carbonate Content non-ASTM method (Twenhofel-Tyler) 35

h) Draft and Final logs and laboratory testing results shall be entered into an appropriate sample database.

The logs shall be drafted using agreed upon software or outputs similar to USACE Form 1836 for each core.

i) Core or boring description sheets and drilling logs for each core will be completed using the templates found in Attachment 4. Alternatively, the Contractor may use its standard core description template if it includes the information required by the SOW and is accepted by BOEM (see Attachment 4 for an example of a BOEM-approved core description sheet and log).

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 9

j) Draft logs shall be finalized utilizing the laboratory testing results and submitted to the COR and the MMUGulf@boem.gov email box for review.

k) Vibracores and borings shall be stored after the logs are finalized. Core delivery and storage shall be coordinated with the BOEM’s GOAR RE following critical minerals sampling outlined in Task 2.4.6.

Deliverables:

• Draft core and sample logs for review (pdf)

• Final core and sample logs including laboratory testing results (pdf and database file)

• Draft and final reports for vibracore collection and sample analyses (pdf and editable file)

• Meetings, emails, and logs with COR during field work.

2.4.5 Task 5 Delineation, Descriptions, and Volumetrics of Sand and Sediment Resources

Based on the geophysical and geological results, potential borrow areas shall be delineated for both sand and sediment resources.

2.4.5.1

A summary report of the delineated sand bodies shall be submitted as part of the final report. The report shall include maps, boring logs, lab results, geophysical and geological profiles, summary tables, a preliminary sediment resource area with depth of resource map with contours and a preliminary analysis of volumetrics.

2.4.5.2

The final report shall be submitted electronically. The electronic submittals shall include the report in pdf format and all files in their original format, such as for example Word, Excel, GIS, AutoCAD.

Deliverables

1. One (1) final report (pdf and word format).

2. Supporting appendices, tables, figures, GIS, and other source files used to produce the report.

3. GIS Shapefiles of Sediment Resources

4. Table of volumetrics for Sediment Resources

2.4.6 Task 6 Critical Minerals Sampling and Analyses

A set of 70 samples from cores collected in Task 4 will be analyzed for critical minerals. This analysis will be to identify which critical minerals are found in the sample and the percentage of those minerals in each sample.

After core descriptions are completed, a critical minerals sampling plan will be developed by the Contractor and BOEM. Critical Mineral sampling plan should be based on contractor capabilities and expertise. Table 2 provides a list of potential tests to be run, final plan to be suggested by contractor and agreed upon by BOEM.

All collected critical mineral samples are to be run through grain size analysis using a Laser Particle Size Analysis (LPSA) and reported in half phi intervals.

Table 2. Summary of Critical Mineral Sample Testing

Laboratory Testing Number of Tests

LPSA Analysis at ½ Phi intervals 70

Qualitative Whole Rock Analysis 70

Elemental Analysis (Subset of USGS list agreed upon by BOEM) 70

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 10

Mineralogical Analysis (Subset of Minerals listed in attachment 6 and agreed upon by BOEM) 70

Heavy Mineral Separation 15

SEM/QEM or SEM/TIMA Full Analysis 5

All collected critical minerals samples should be run for qualitative whole rock geochemical analysis.

All samples should be analyzed with an ICP-AES and/or ICP-MS, or comparable system, to determine the elements in each sample. The final number of elements will be agreed upon by the Contractor and BOEM, but should include at least 50 of the elements listed in the following sentence. The analysis should be conducted on the relevant critical minerals in the Gulf of America from the final 2025 List of Critical Minerals, published to the Federal Register (Federal Register: Final 2025 List of Critical Minerals), which includes 60 minerals in Attachment 5 below. The list of common critical mineral elements commonly found in sand are in Attachment 6 below. BOEM and the Contractor will select a subset of these critical mineral elements for analysis.

Upon completion of the previous analyses, a group of specified samples agreed upon by BOEM and the Contractor will undergo heavy liquid separation. The Contractor shall use fifteen samples for bid purposes.

Contractors should include pricing to potentially run five samples using either SEM/QEM or SEM/TIMA, or similar analyses to provide grain size data, particle maps, and the liberation and association of target minerals.

Contractors are encouraged to and may propose alternative methods of analyzing samples for critical minerals but must include pricing and provide samples of test outputs.

For an example of critical minerals data sheet, see Attachment 7 below.

Deliverables:

• Draft and final reports for critical minerals sampling and analyses (pdf and word file) (see Attachment 3 below)

• Draft and final excel spreadsheet of results (excel file)

• Meetings, emails, and logs with COR during field work.

2.5 MEETINGS, REPORTS, AND DELIVERABLES

The contractor shall participate in meetings, submit recurring reports, and provide all deliverables necessary to support successful planning, execution, review, and completion of the work. Meetings will be conducted virtually. All draft deliverables are subject to Government review and comment, and all final deliverables are subject to Government acceptance. Unless otherwise specified, the Government will have 30 calendar days to review draft submittals. The contractor shall address Government comments and submit final deliverables in accordance with the approved schedule.

2.5.1 Meetings

The contractor shall participate in the meetings and coordination activities listed below, and any additional meetings reasonably necessary to perform the work. The contractor shall prepare and submit meeting minutes within 5 calendar days following each meeting, unless otherwise directed by the Contracting Officer Representative (COR).

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/11/07/2025-19813/final-2025-list-of-critical-minerals

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 11

Meeting / Coordination Activity

Purpose Participants Timing / Frequency Required Documentation

Kickoff Meeting Review project objectives, scope, schedule, roles and responsibilities, communication protocols, and initial planning requirements.

Contractor, COR, BOEM technical representatives, and other Government personnel as needed.

After award and prior to commencement of substantive planning activities.

Meeting minutes submitted within 5 calendar days following the meeting.

Quarterly Progress Review Meetings

Review project status, work completed during the quarter, planned work for the next quarter, schedule status, deliverable status, risks, issues, field work progress, data processing status, and any Government action items needed to support continued performance.

Contractor, COR, BOEM technical representatives, and other Government personnel as needed.

Quarterly throughout the period of performance, unless otherwise directed by the COR.

Quarterly progress report and meeting minutes submitted within 5 calendar days following each meeting.

Pre-Field Work Coordination Meeting

Confirm field work schedule, vessel information, communication protocols, reporting requirements, mitigation procedures, and readiness to begin survey or sampling activities.

Contractor, COR, BOEM technical representatives, and field operations personnel as needed.

Prior to commencement of field data collection activities.

Meeting minutes and/or coordination records.

Field Work Progress Meetings

Discuss field work progress, data quality, collection issues, schedule impacts, and any needed Government coordination or decisions.

Contractor, COR, BOEM technical representatives, and field team representatives as needed.

Weekly meetings (Monday morning), and additional meetings as required by BOEM. Within 24 hours of the start of data collection and as needed during field work.

Emails, meeting notes, field logs, or other coordination records.

Geophysical Data Review / Vibracore Location Coordination Meeting

Review preliminary geophysical interpretations and coordinate proposed vibracore locations based on survey results, archaeological clearance, and BOEM input.

Contractor, COR, contractor’s archaeologist, BOEM GOAR

Resource Evaluation, BOEM archaeologist, and

After preliminary geophysical interpretation and prior to final vibracore location selection.

Meeting minutes, updated location information, and any revised planning documentation.

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 12

Meeting / Coordination Activity

Purpose Participants Timing / Frequency Required Documentation other technical personnel as needed.

Final Deliverable / Closeout Meeting

Confirm completion of required work, final deliverables, data submissions, report files, and any remaining closeout items.

Contractor, COR, BOEM technical representatives, and other Government personnel as needed.

Prior to final acceptance or at project closeout, if requested by the Government.

Meeting minutes and closeout action item list, as applicable.

2.5.2 Reports

The contractor shall submit reports necessary to document project status, data collection, analysis, findings, and completion of the work. Reports shall be submitted electronically to the COR and other Government personnel identified by the COR.

Report Purpose Timing / Frequency

Required Content Submission Requirements

Quarterly Progress Report

Provide the Government with a recurring status update on project progress, schedule, deliverables, field work, data processing, risks, and upcoming activities.

Quarterly throughout the period of performance, beginning after contract award.

Work completed during the reporting period; work planned for the next reporting period; schedule status;

deliverable status; field work/data collection status; data processing and analysis status;

issues, risks, or delays;

corrective actions; and Government action items, if any.

Submit electronically to the COR and other Government personnel identified by the COR.

Draft Summary Report

Provide BOEM with the draft results of the investigation for Government review and comment.

In accordance with the approved schedule;

suggested milestone is 550 calendar days after kickoff.

Maps, boring logs, laboratory results, geophysical and geological profiles, summary tables, preliminary borrow area delineation, depth-of-resource map with contours, and preliminary volumetric analysis.

Submit electronically in PDF and Word format.

Final Summary Report

Provide the final investigation results, including all revisions

In accordance with the approved schedule;

Final report, final maps, final boring logs, laboratory results, Submit electronically in PDF format and provide all original/native files, Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 13

Report Purpose Timing / Frequency

Required Content Submission Requirements required to address Government comments.

suggested milestone is 700 calendar days after kickoff.

geophysical and geological profiles, summary tables, final interpretations, data products, and supporting files.

such as Word, Excel, GIS, AutoCAD, and other applicable formats.

2.5.3 Deliverables

The following table summarizes required deliverables, associated task areas, required formats, and anticipated submission timing. All deliverables shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of this Statement of Work and are subject to Government review, comment, and acceptance.

The schedule above may be refined through the approved investigation plan and project schedule. The contractor may complete tasks before the listed milestone dates. Meeting minutes shall be finalized within 5 calendar days after the Government comment review period has ended, unless otherwise directed by the COR.

Task / Section Deliverable Format Due Date / Timing Submission Requirements

2.4.3 - Geophysical Surveys

Final investigation plan.

Word and PDF Prior to geophysical survey work and updated as necessary.

Submit to BOEM GOAR Resource Evaluation for final approval.

2.4.3 – Geophysical Survey Investigations

Field work coordination records

Emails, meeting records, and logs

During field work. Keep the COR updated on field work progress and data quality. Notify BOEM immediately of field collection issues.

2.4.3 - Geophysical Surveys

Geophysical survey data

Required data formats identified in the SOW, including ArcGIS-readable formats, SEG-Y with navigation data incorporated, XTF, geodatabase, TIFF, CSV, DBF, shapefile, and other applicable formats.

After completion and processing of geophysical survey activities.

Submit all raw, processed, interpreted, spatial, and metadata files in the formats required by the SOW.

2.4.3 - Geophysical Surveys

Preliminary review of geophysical data

Electronic data products and supporting files

90 calendar days after completion of data collection.

Submit to BOEM GOAR Resource Evaluation for review prior to the vibracore selection process.

2.4.3 - Geophysical Surveys

Metadata for each dataset

FGDC CSDGM or ISO 19115 metadata format, as applicable

With each applicable dataset or data product.

Metadata shall accompany each dataset and data product submitted.

2.4.4 – Core Collection

Core Collection Plan

Word and PDF Prior to Core collection.

Submit to BOEM GOAR Resource Evaluation for final approval.

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 14

Task / Section Deliverable Format Due Date / Timing Submission Requirements

2.4.4 - Core Collection

Draft core logs

PDF Following core collection, logging, and prior to sample selection.

Submit electronically to the COR and MMUGulf@BOEM.gov for review and sample selection.

2.4.4 – Core Collection Investigations

Field work coordination records

Emails, meeting records, and logs

During field work. Keep the COR updated on field work progress and data quality. Notify BOEM immediately of field collection issues.

2.4.4 - Core Collection

Core photographs

Electronic image files Prior to disturbance via sampling.

Photographs shall include scale, 18% gray background, natural light, and the vibracore unique identifier.

2.4.4 - Core Collection

Final core logs including laboratory testing results

PDF and database file After laboratory testing and incorporation of Government comments.

Following completion of required testing.

Submit final logs and laboratory testing results to the COR and MMUGulf@BOEM.gov.

Include results for all required testing.

2.4.5 – Delineation, Descriptions, and Volumetrics of Sand and Sediment Resources

Shapefiles delineating Sediment Resources

ArcGIS-readable formats Submit with Final Report

Submit results identifying sediment resources.

2.4.3 – 2.4.5 Final Report

Final Report G&G, Sediment Resources

Word and PDF Following data collection and sample testing

Submit results of geophysical survey, geotechnical survey, sample analysis and identified sediment resources w volumetrics (as outlined in Attachment 2).

2.4.6 – Critical Minerals Sampling and Analyses Data

Critical mineral analysis results

Excel Sheet Following analysis of selected samples.

Submit results identifying critical minerals found and the percentage of those minerals in each sample.

2.4.6 – Critical Minerals Final Report

Critical mineral analysis results

Electronic report/data format

Following analysis of selected samples.

Submit results identifying critical minerals found and the percentage of those minerals in each sample (as outlined in Attachment 3).

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 15

2.6 ADDRESSES FOR DELIVERABLES

Point of Contacts Abbreviation Name and contact Information

Marine Minerals Unit Supervisor MMU Supervisor

Richard Mackenzie Email: Richard.Mackenzie@boem.gov Work Phone: 504-736-2709

Contracting Officer Representative COR

Angie Guidry Email: Angela.Guidry@boem.gov Work Phone: 504-736-2819

Contracting Officer

CO

William “Joe” Rilee Email: william_rilee@ios.doi.gov Work Phone: 703-787-1757

2.7 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

General quality measures, as set forth below, will be applied to each work product received from the Contractor under this contract.

• Accuracy - Work Products shall be accurate in presentation, technical content, and adherence to accepted elements of style.

• Clarity - Work Products shall be clear and concise. Any/All diagrams shall be easy to understand and be relevant to the supporting narrative.

• Consistency to Requirements - All work products must satisfy the requirements of this contract.

• File Editing - All text and diagrammatic files shall be editable by the Government.

• Format - Work Products shall be submitted in hard copy (where applicable) and in media mutually agreed upon prior to submission. Hard copy formats shall follow any specified Directives or Manuals.

• Timeliness - Work Products shall be submitted on or before the due date specified in this contract or submitted in accordance with a later scheduled date determined by the Government.

2.8 QUALITY ASSURANCE

The Government will perform quality assurance through review of required deliverables, participation in project meetings, review of schedule and status information, observation of installation and testing activities, review of cybersecurity/security documentation, and verification that the installed solution meets the SOO requirements and accepted contractor proposal. The contractor shall correct deficiencies identified by the Government prior to final acceptance.

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 16

SECTION 6

ATTACHMENTS

No. Title No. of Pages

1 Investigation Areas and Potential Sand Source Maps 3

2 Suggested Table of Contents for G&G Report 1

3 Suggested Table of Contents for Critical Minerals Report 1

4 Example of Core Description Sheet and Drilling Log Sheet 2

5 Critical Minerals Commonly Found in Coastal Sands 2

6 Final 2025 List of Critical Minerals 3

7 Critical Minerals Data Sheet Template 1

8 Task Pricing Excel Sheet Template 1 file

9 Vessel Information Form 2

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 17

Attachment 1

Figure 1. Area of investigation map of Ship Shoal with infrastructure and modeled shoal. Red box denotes the AOI and location of SSRA Blocks targeted for G&G investigation.

Figure 2. Ship Shoal AOI with proposed Geophysical Lines.

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 18

Attachment 2 Suggested Table of Contents template for the final G&G investigation report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Scope

2.0 GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS

2.1 Investigation Area Naming Conventions

2.2 Proposed Investigation Areas

2.3 Geophysical Surveys

2.3.1 Seismic Reflection Profile Survey CHIRP

2.3.2 Multibeam Bathymetric Survey

2.3.3 Magnetometer Survey

2.3.4 Side Scan Sonar Survey

3.0 CORE COLLECTION

4.0 CORE LOGGING AND SAMPLE ANALYSIS

4.1 Boring Logs and Photographs

4.2 Sample Testing

4.3 LPSA/Sieve Analysis

4.4 Calcium Carbonate Analysis

4.5 Post-Carbonate LPSA/Sieve Analysis

4.6 Data Archiving

5.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS

5.1 Existing/Native Beach

5.2 Restoration Sediments Encountered

5.3 Description of Investigation Areas and Sediments Encountered

5.3.1 Area 1

5.3.2 Area 2

6.0 SUMMARY OF INVESTIGATION AREAS AND POTENTIAL SAND SOURCES

7.0 REFERENCES

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 19

Attachment 3

Suggested Table of Contents template for the final Critical Minerals investigation report.

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 Scope

3.0 SAMPLE RECIEPT AND PREPERATION

4.0 TEST ORDER, OPERATIONAL MODES AND QUALITY CONTROL

4.1 Sample Test Order

4.2 Test Equipment and Operational Modes

4.3 Quality Control

5.0 PRELIMINARY SCANS AND TESTING (Qualitative Analysis)

5.1 Equipment Used

5.2 Test Run & Methodology

5.3 Results

6.0 ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS

6.1 Equipment Used

6.2 Test Run & Methodology

6.3 Results

7.0 SEPERATION

7.1 Equipment Used

7.2 Test Run & Methodology

7.3 Results

8.0 GEOCHEMICAL OXCIDE ANALYSIS

9.0 Equipment Used

9.1 Test Run & Methodology

9.2 Results

10.0 MINERALOGICAL ANALYSIS

10.1 Equipment Used

10.2 Test Run & Methodology

10.3 Results

11.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS

12.0 SUMMARY OF INVESTIGATION AND POTENTIAL CRITICAL MINERAL SOURCES

13.0 REFERENCES

14.0 APPENDICES

14.1 Spreadsheet of Data Formatted for BOEM

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 20

Attachment 4

Example of Core Description Sheet and Drilling Log Sheet

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 21

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 22

Attachment 5

Table 1. Final 2025 List of Critical Minerals from USGS.

Mineral commodities for inclusion on the final 2025 List of Critical Minerals

Produced as a byproduct/co-product Main host commodities for byproducts/co-products

Aluminum No

Antimony Yes Lead, gold, other base and precious metals.

Arsenic Yes Copper, gold, lead, zinc.

Barite No

Beryllium No

Bismuth Yes Lead, tungsten, copper, tin, molybdenum, fluorspar, zinc.

Boron No

Cerium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Cesium No

Chromium No

Cobalt Yes Nickel, copper.

Copper No

Dysprosium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Erbium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Europium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Fluorspar No

Gadolinium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Gallium Yes Bauxite and zinc.

Germanium Yes Zinc and coal fly ash.

Graphite Yes (for synthetic graphite but not for natural graphite)

Needle coke (for synthetic graphite).

Hafnium Yes Zirconium.

Holmium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Indium Yes Zinc.

Iridium Yes Platinum, nickel.

Lanthanum Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Lead No

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 23

Lithium No

Lutetium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Magnesium No

Manganese No

Metallurgical coal No .

Neodymium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Nickel No

Niobium No

Palladium Yes Nickel, platinum.

Phosphate No

Platinum No

Potash No

Praseodymium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Rhenium Yes Molybdenum, copper.

Rhodium Yes Nickel, platinum.

Rubidium Yes Cesium, lithium.

Ruthenium Yes Nickel, platinum.

Samarium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Scandium Yes Cobalt, nickel, titanium, zirconium.

Silicon No

Silver Yes Zinc, lead, copper, gold.

Tantalum No

Tellurium Yes Copper, lead, nickel, platinum, zinc.

Terbium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Thulium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Tin No

Titanium No

Tungsten No

Uranium No

Vanadium Yes Steel slag from vanadiferous iron ore, spent catalysts.

Ytterbium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Yttrium Yes Other rare earths, iron ore, heavy mineral sands (titanium, zirconium).

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 24

Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/11/07/2025-19813/final-2025-list-of-critical-minerals

Zinc No

Zirconium Yes Titanium, tin.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/11/07/2025-19813/final-2025-list-of-critical-minerals

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 25

Attachment 6

Table 1. Critical minerals commonly found in coastal sands.

Mineral Name

(abbreviation)1

Composition3 Specific gravity4

Critical commodities5

Other economic commodities

Monazite (Mzn) (Ce,La,Nd,Th)PO4 4.6 - 5.4 REE, Y Th

Xenotime (Xtm) Y(HREE)PO4 4.4 - 5.1 Y, REE U

Ilmenorutile TiNbO2 4.7 - 4.8 Ti, Nb -

Ilmenite (Ilm) Fe2+TiO3 4.7 Ti -

Zircon (Zrn) ZrSiO4 +/- U, Th, Hf, and REE 4.7 Zr, Hf, REE U, Th, refractory

Chromite (Chr) (Fe,Mg)Cr2O4 4.6 Cr refractory

Davidite (n/a) (La,Ce,Ca)(Y,U)(Ti,Fe3+)20O38 4.3 - 4.5 REE, Y, Ti U

Rutile (Rt) TiO2 4.2 - 4.3 Ti -

Leucoxene (Lcx)2 Altered Fe-Ti oxide 3.6 - 4.3 Ti -

Allanite (Aln) (Ca,Ce)(AlAlFe2+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH) 3.5 - 4.2 Ce -

Ti silicates (e.g.,titanite, sphene)

(Ttn, Spn)

Ca,Ti(SiO4)O 3.5 - 3.6 Ti -

Apatite (Ap) Ca5(PO4)3(Cl/F/OH) +/- REE, U, and Sr 3.2 REE, Sr U, fertilizer (P)

Hematite (Hem) Fe2O3 5.3 - Fe ore

Magnetite (Mag) Fe2O3 5.2 - Fe ore

Pyrite (Py) FeS2 5.0 - S

Garnet group (Grt) X3Z2(SiO4)3 3.4 - 4.6 - abrasive

Staurolite (St) Fe2+ 2Al9Si4O23(OH) 3.6 - abrasive, cement

Kyanite (Ky) Al2SiO5 3.5 - 3.7 - Al, refractory

Sillimanite (Sil) Al2SiO5 3.2 - Al, refractory

Spinel (Spl) MgAl2O4 3.5 - 4.1 - -

Pyroxene group (Px) ADSi2O6

A = Ca, Cu, Li, Fe2+, Mg, Mn2+, Na

D = Al, Cr, Fe3+, Mg, Mn2+, Ti3+, V3+, Zn

3.5 - 3.7 - -

Epidote (Ep) Ca2(Al,Fe)3(SiO4)3(OH) 3.4 - 3.5 - -

Schorl (Srl)

Tourmaline (Tur)

NaFe2+ 3Al6(Si6O18)(BO3)3(OH)3(OH)

3.2 /

2.9 - 3.1

Amphibole group

(Amp)

AB2C5((Si,Al,Ti)8O22)(OH,F,Cl,O)2

A = Na, K, Ca, Pb2+

2.9 - 3.6 - -

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 26

B = Li, Na, Mg, Fe2+, Mn2+, Ca

C = Li, Na, Mg, Fe2+, Mn2+, Zn, Co, Ni, Al, Fe3+, Cr3+, Mn3+, V3+, Ti, Zr

Chlorite group

(Chl)

A5-6T4Z18

A = Al, Fe2+, Fe3+, Li, Mg, Mn, or Ni

T = Al, Fe3+, and/or Si

Z = O and/or OH

2.6 - 3.3 - -

1Original abbreviation by Kretz (1983), expanded by Whitney and Evans (2010), unless otherwise noted.

2Leucoxene is an alteration product of ilmenite, rutile, sphene or anatase and does not have an accepted mineral abbreviation.

3mindat.org.

4Van Gosen et al. (2014); Garner (1978).

5Fortier et al. (2018); critical commodities per 87 FR 10381 (Federal Register 2022).

Request for Quote 140M0126Q0031 27

Attachment 7

Critical Minerals Data Sheet Template (See File)