B08_Att. 0002_Past Performance Questionaire Coverletter_Questionaire_W91ZLK-25-R-0016.pdf
PDF 248 KB Posted
- Attached to
- High Efficiency Gas Adsorbers
- Solicitation number
- W91ZLK25R0016
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire issued by the U.S. Army Contracting Command - Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG) for Request for Proposal (RFP) Number W91ZLK-25-R-0016, seeking past performance information for a potential contract to supply High Efficiency Gas Adsorbers (HEGA). The questionnaire is designed to collect detailed performance evaluations from previous contract points of contact, with ratings ranging from Substantial Confidence to No Confidence across multiple performance areas including compliance with specifications, project management, timeliness, and customer satisfaction.
The document provides a structured framework for respondents to assess a contractor's performance, requiring rationale for each rating and requesting additional context about the contractor's past work. The questionnaire must be completed and returned within 15 days of receipt to Lenard B. Wright and Birgit M. Jones at specified Army email addresses. The assessment is part of a competitive source selection process for a contract related to Industrial and Commercial Fan and Blower and Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing (NAICS code 333413), with the government anticipating an award of a single Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract for a 60-month ordering period.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND
6472 INTEGRITY COURT, BUILDING 4401
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD 21005-3013
CCAP-MDT 4 June 2025
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number W91ZLK-25-R-0016
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Contracting Command - Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG), Installation and Technology Division, Maryland is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local Government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 333413.
You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the Army Contracting Command- Aberdeen Proving Ground, Installation and Technology Division, 6472 Integrity Court, Building 4401, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21005, no later than 15 days after receipt of request. Your completed questionnaire may be submitted electronically to Lenard B.
Wright, lenard.b.wright.civ@army.mil and copy Birgit M. Jones, birgit.m.jones.civ@army.mil.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at birgit.m.jones.civ@army.mil and lenard.b.wright.civ@army.mil.
Sincerely, Birgit M. Jones Contracting Officer
Past Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions, or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor’s name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
| 2025-06-04T21:11:04-0400 | |
| JONES.BIRGIT.MAGDALENE.1018888412 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .