B01 Brand Name JA ATC Toolboxes redacted.pdf

PDF 535 KB Posted

Attached to
Snap-On Automatic Tool Control Toolboxes
Solicitation number
W50S7E-24-Q-0025
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition (JOFOC) related to a federal contract opportunity for Automatic Tool Control (ATC) Toolboxes.

The key details are:

  • The requirement is brand name specific to Snap-On ATC Toolboxes, as no other vendors were found to be compatible with the existing system.
  • The total estimated cost is not provided.
  • The contracting officer determined that the brand name requirement is justified under FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i) due to the need for compatibility with the existing ATC system.
  • The related federal contract opportunity is a Request for Quotation (RFQ) for Snap-On ATC Toolboxes, solicitation number W50S7E-24-Q-0025. It is a 100% small business set-aside with quotes due by 26 August 2024. The contract will be a firm-fixed price order evaluated on best value criteria including price, technical acceptability, equipment capabilities, delivery time, and past performance.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
A02 SOW Pricing Spreadsheet ATC Toolboxes MXG Rev 1.xls XLS spreadsheet
B01 W50S7E24Q0025 ATC Toolboxes final.docx DOCX document
A02 SOW ATC Toolbox MXG final.docx DOCX document
A02 SOW Pricing Spreadsheet ATC Toolboxes MXG final.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Is my requirement Brand Name Specific or Sole Source?

Brand Name Specifc: Sole Source:

link link

133d AIRLIFT WING - CONTRACTING OFFICE

JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Over the Micro-Purchase Limit and under the Simplified Acqusition Threshold

Part 1: General Information

Date:

Unit:

Resource Advisor:

Requirement Title:

Est. Cost:

Name of person completing this justification:

INSTRUCTIONS: Use this form, after completion of the Market Research Report, to document the justification to limit competition to a specific brand or to one sole source vendor. IAW FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i) "Contracting officers may solicit from one source if the contracting officer determines that the circumstances of the contract action deem only one source reasonably available (e.g., urgency, exclusive licensing agreements, brand-name or industrial mobilization)." IAW 8.405-6 for FSS, 13.106-1 for

Brand Name specific and 13.106-3 for Sole Source

Your Requirement justifies a specific brand name that is only available from the manufacturer. Only one vendor sells the requirement, meaning there is no competition available for the requirement. Sole Source requirements are rare.

Your requirement justifies a specific brand name and it can be purchased from numerous vendors, such as manufacturer authorized dealers. Since there is more than one vendor, competition can be obtained from the vendors who sell the requirement.

IAW 13.106-1(b)(1)(i), Soliciting from a single source go to page 2

What actions, if any, the Government may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before future acquisitions are requires?

AF Form 9 Number:

Name of proposed Brand Name (manufacturer & model number) or Sole Source Vendor:

Part 2: Justifying circumstances

Unique characteristics or circumstances that justify the use of a specific brand name or a sole source vendor:

Document Market Research on "Customer Market Research Report"

Brief descripton of supplies/services required and intended use: (detailed description will be on the Purchase Request document)

2/26/2022 https://usaf.dps.mil/sites/133AW/MSG/Contracting/Contracting/%233 A02 Market Research Report from Customer.pdf https://www.acquisition.gov/far/part-13#FAR_13_106_1

Customer Name, Rank Customer Digital Signature

CONTRACTING OFFICER DETERMINATION

Contracting Officer Name, Rank Contracting Officer Digital Signature

"I certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief, and I determine that completing this purchase as a

Part 3: Contracting Officer Determination and Approval

Limited competition of an order under a Federal Supply Schedule, IAW FAR 8.405-6. This form is being used to satisfy documentation requirement of FAR 8.405-6(b)(2).

Contracting Officer Comments:

is in the best interest of the Government. Additionally, I approve this justification to limit competition subject to the availability of funds and provided that the supplies or services hereis described have otherwise been authorized for acquisition."

Sole Source Justification IAW FAR 13.106-3. This form is being used to satisfy documentation requirement of FAR 13.106-

3(b)(3)(i).

Brand Name Justification IAW FAR 13.106-1. This form is being used to satisfy required determination of FAR 13.106-

1(b)(1)(i).

Requirement Title:

Est. Cost:

Name of person completing this justification:

2/26/2022

Date: 26 March 2024
Unit: 133 MXG
Resource Advisor: CMSgt Thompson
AF Form 9 Number: UFR
Name of proposed Brand Name manufacturer model number or Sole Source Vendor: Snap On
Customer Name Rank: Robert Carlson, MSgt
2024-03-27T06:05:53-0500
CARLSON.ROBERT.AUGUST.1261813382
Contracting Officer Name Rank: ANN K. FEIST, Lt Col
2024-08-12T10:41:58-0500
FEIST.ANN.KATHRYN.1138178338
Text1: 3 Level 5 ATC toolboxes and tools for use and tracking of required tools for aircraft maintenance.
Text2: The ISO Dock currently has 1 level 5 ATC Toolbox and the software and licensing to run it. This system consists of automated toolboxes that monitors and controls which tools are removed and replaced from them, the tools inside the toolboxes, an admin computer, and tool control software. It allows for an extreme level of control and accountability for tools used while aircraft maintenance is performed while reducing the demand on MX personnel's time. This has lead to greatly improved tool accountability and availability while removing the need for an individual to continually monitor the toolbox. This UFR is to expand on what is currently in use and Snap On is the sole vendor that provides the product and service MX . A secondary service would negate much of the benefit of time savings and require additional costs in software, licensing, and computer maintenance.
Text3: Encourage other vendors to develop ATC services that are cross compatible.
Text4: The current tool control tool boxes are Snap-On, competed full and open in W50S7E-21-P-0009. Awarded to ***** purchasing Snap-on toolboxes. Current requirement is to add additional tool control tool boxes on to these existing toolboxes. The tool boxes must be compatible with the existing Snap-on boxes in order to realize maximum efficiency and accurate tracking of tools. Market research did not find any compatible toolboxes from other manufacturers. Will post this Brand Name Specific.
Requirement Title: ATC Toolboxes
Est Cost:
Name of person completing this justification: MSgt Carlson
Check Box5: Off
Check Box6: Yes
Check Box7: Off

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .