B.01.03-AM#03.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FTW360 1 + 1 Barracks, Ft Wainw right, AK

a. The purpose of this amendment is to update Section 00 22 00 PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD.

b. See continuation page

c. Government POC for this action is Yolanda M. Ikner, 907-753-2553

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 30

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 09-May-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W911KB22R0019

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

05-Apr-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

09-May-2022

CODE

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, AK

CEPOA-CT (W911KB)

2204 TALLEY AVENUE

JBER AK 99506-0898

W911KB 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FTW360– Amendment #3 (AM#03) 9 May 2022

Summary of Changes

a. The proposal due date remains May 12 at 2:00pm AST

b. The following drawings are added:

NONE

c. The following drawings are deleted:

NONE

d. The following revised documents/sections are substituted for the superseded documents/sections:

Section 00 22 20

PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD

Replaced in its entirety. The changed section is paragraph 5.4.2.1 (3). The changes are marked AM#03.

e. The following sections are added:

NONE

f. The following sections are deleted:

g. Other:

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS SHALL REMAIN THE SAME

(End of Summary of Changes)

Section 00 22 20 W911KB22R0019

FTW360

Section 00 22 20 Page 1

SECTION 00 22 20

PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

3.0 STIPEND FOR UNSUCCESSFUL PHASE 2 OFFERORS

4.0 PHASE 2 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS, SUBFACTORS AND

ELEMENTS

5.0 VOLUME 1 – FACTOR 1 – DESIGN TECHNICAL

5.1. GENERAL

5.2. TAB A – SUBFACTOR 1 – BUILDING FUNCTION AND AESTHETICS

5.3. TAB B – SUBFACTOR 2 – QUALITY OF BUILDING SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS

5.4. TAB C – SUBFACTOR 3 – SITE DESIGN

5.5. TAB D – SUBFACTOR 4 – PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND SUMMARY SCHEDULE

6.0 VOLUME 2 – EXTENT OF PARTICIPATION OF SMALL BUSINESSES, PRICE AND PRO FORMA

INFORMATION

6.1 TAB A – FACTOR 2 – EXTENT OF PARTICIPATION OF SMALL BUSINESSES

6.2 TAB B – FACTOR 3 – PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442 AND CONTRACT LINE ITEM

SCHEDULE)

6.3 TAB C – REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

6.4 TAB D – SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

7.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

7.1. GENERAL

7.2. DISCUSSIONS (IF NECESSARY)

PHASE TWO – SECTION 00 22 20 ATTACHMENTS

5 – EXTENT OF PARTICIPATION OF SMALL BUSINESSES FORMAT

6 – SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN FORMAT

Section 00 22 20 Page 2

1.0 OVERVIEW

The most highly qualified offerors selected in Phase 1 are invited to submit a Phase 2 proposal, as indicated below.

The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria described herein, using the evaluation rating systems outlined in the Phase 1 Design-Build selection procedures. Price information will be evaluated for fairness, reasonableness, and for material unbalancing, as described herein. The Phase 2 evaluation will be conducted in accordance with FAR Part 15 and will utilize the Tradeoff Process described in FAR 15.101-1.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

The Contracting Officer will award a firm fixed-price contract to the responsible Phase 2 Offeror whose proposal the

Source Selection Authority determines conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering the non-price factors described herein, and price. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are considered significantly more important than the price, however, the Contract award may not be possible if proposed price exceeds the cost limitation described in Section 00 21 00 for this project. The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal within the cost limitation. There is no obligation to approach or match the cost limitation in the offer. After the Government individually evaluates and rates each proposal, the

Contracting Officer/Source Selection Authority will compare proposals to determine which proposal represents the best value. Proposals will not be ranked. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. If there is a lower priced, conforming offer(s), the Contracting

Officer/Source Selection Official must determine that the added value of a more expensive proposal (within the cost limitation) would justify award to that Offeror.

2.1. As part of the evaluation, the Government will evaluate betterments in proposals relative to the minimum standards in the RFP to determine if they offer additional value to the Government. In addition, innovations in proposals will be evaluated to determine if creative ideas of the Offeror are a better value to the Government compared to the minimum criteria.

2.2 Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint.

Do not assume that offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals.

3.0 STIPEND FOR UNSUCCESSFUL PHASE 2 OFFERORS

3.1. A stipend is not currently authorized for this acquisition.

Section 00 22 20 Page 3

4.0 PHASE 2 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS, SUBFACTORS AND

ELEMENTS

(VOLUME 1 – DESIGN TECHNICAL)

Factor/Sub

Factor

Location

Description

Relative Importance

FACTOR 1

DESIGN TECHNICAL Most Important Factor

Subfactor 1

Vol. 1 TAB A

Building Function and Aesthetics Equally Important to Subfactor 2 (slightly more important than Subfactor 3)

Subfactor 2

Vol. 1 TAB B Quality of Building Systems and

Materials

Equally Important to Subfactor 1 (slightly more important than Subfactor 3)

Subfactor 3

Vol. 1 TAB C

Site Design 2nd Most Important Subfactor (slightly less important than Subfactors 1 and 2)

Subfactor 4

Vol. 1 TAB D Proposed Contract Duration and

Summary Schedule

3rd Most Important Subfactor (slightly less important than Subfactor 3)

(VOLUME 2 – EXTENT OF PARTICIPATION OF SMALL BUSINESSES, PRICE, PRO FORMA

IMFORMATION)

Factor/Sub

Factor

Location

Description

Relative Importance

FACTOR 2

Vol. 2 TAB A

EXTENT OF

PARTICIPATION OF

SMALL BUSINESSES

(applicable to Small and

Large Businesses)

2nd Most Important Factor (significantly less important than Factor 1, more important than Factor 3)

FACTOR 3

Vol. 2 TAB B

PRICE (Standard Form 1442 and

Proposal Schedule)

3rd Most Important Factor (significantly less important than Factors 1 and 2 combined)

N/A Vol. 2 TAB C Required Pre-Award Information Not Rated

N/A

Vol. 2 TAB D

Subcontracting Plan (Upon request by the Contracting Officer and applicable to Large

Businesses only)

Not Rated

5.0 VOLUME 1 – FACTOR 1 – DESIGN - TECHNICAL

5.1 GENERAL: The design-technical factor consists of conceptual level presentation drawings, technical approach narratives and information regarding material and system quality. It must clearly define the proposed

Section 00 22 20 Page 4 scope and quality levels that the design-build team is offering to the Government in enough detail for the

Government and the Offeror to mutually understand whether or not the proposal meets or exceeds the minimum

Solicitation requirements. The use of BIM to prepare or submit proposals is NOT required. Fully developed drawings, details or specifications are not required or desired. Unless specifically stated herein, the

Government will not be performing a detailed engineering analysis or design review at the proposal stage.

The intent during the proposal submission and review process is not to require detailed design effort or to perform a detailed design engineering review but to focus on the proposed quality levels of materials and systems. If the

Government evaluators have actual knowledge or strong suspicion that a proposed product or solution is inappropriately sized, being used in the wrong application or otherwise does not meet the contract requirements, the

Government will inform the proposer in the event that discussions are conducted with the firm. But the Government is not asking for design analyses in the proposal and is not obligated to perform an engineering design review at this stage. After award, in the event of conflict between the contractor’s accepted proposal and the requirements in the final amended RFP, the order of precedence is indicated in SCR-DB040, “Design Build Order Of Precedence.”

The Offeror shall identify what it considers to be Betterments in its proposal for Factor 1 (See Section 00 73 00.00

29, SCR “Proposed Betterments”). Betterments included in the technical submission must also be included in the base price under Factor 3. Do not describe in the narratives or show in the drawings any betterments that are not included in the base price. The final design must comply with the RFP requirements except that accepted betterments become the new contract minimum requirements. Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, where indicated below.

5.2 VOLUME 1 - TAB A –SUBFACTOR 1 - BUILDING FUNCTION AND AESTHETICS

5.2.1 Submission Requirements:

5.2.1.1 Presentation Drawings: Limit presentation drawings to no more than twenty-five (25) drawings to include the following:

(a) One overall site plan, showing the building roof plan, all paved areas, access to the site and circulation on the site by automobiles and pedestrians, and any proposed changes to adjacent streets.

Include fencing and gate locations and any special features of landscaping proposed.

(b) One overall floor plan for each floor, clearly labeling all rooms and spaces, and indicating gross dimensions, door and window locations, fire separations more than one hour, adherence to the standardized design, and features required by this RFP beyond the standardized design. The gross square footage cannot exceed 118,500 SF which includes all enclosed space measured from the outside of exterior walls and 1/2 square footage of covered entrances; for this building type only, corridors also shall be included at half of their actual area. The overall site floor plans must clearly show the gross square footage of the proposed building.

(c) Exterior Elevation(s) of the primary elevation of the building noting gross dimensions, doors and windows, materials proposed for use, and colors and patterns.

(d) At least one building section demonstrating exterior wall sections, roof construction, insulation values, finished floor elevations, ceiling heights, and proposed materials.

(e) At least two renderings of the building showing a slightly overhead perspective from one corner of the front façade and from one corner of the rear façade, showing the roof and adjacent façade. Show enough detail to aid in the evaluation of the exterior building aesthetics. Renderings shall be at least 11" x

17" with most of the view filled.

Section 00 22 20 Page 5

5.2.1.2 Color Board

Color Boards: Provide a color board including primary exterior finishes. Provide another color board including primary interior finish materials. Format shall be in accordance with Section 01 33 16.00 29, Design After Award. Color boards may be scanned and printed or may include original samples.

5.2.1.3 Technical Approach Narrative

Provide technical approach narrative defining the elements of the proposal. This narrative shall be no longer than five (5) typewritten pages.

(a) Building Aesthetics. Describe the architectural themes of the various facilities and spaces which demonstrate how the proposal achieves the results desired by the Statement of Work. Narrative should address how the selection of materials and colors enhances the interior aesthetics of the facilities and improves the living and/or working conditions for the soldiers who will utilize the facilities. This narrative is not intended to be a material listing, but to explain/reflect how the selections were made and how they address the requirements.

(b) Technical Engineering Description: Describe in terms of coordination how the proposal addresses the technical systems requirements of the Statement of Work. Specifically, describe how the proposal addresses coordination of the sprinkler, HVAC, plumbing, finishes, and other systems required by the

Statement of Work with the building aesthetics, creating a seamless design. This is NOT a design analysis document but will describe how these systems are taken into account by the proposal.

5.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

The following two elements are equal in importance (not rated separately).

5.2.2.1 Building Aesthetics: This element considers the overall appeal of the facility and the ability of the proposed construction to present a professional, attractive appearance. Exterior considerations include adherence to the Ft. Wainwright Installation Design Guide, proportions, massing, and design integrity. Interior considerations include appropriateness and durability of finishes and materials, lighting improvements, and color and pattern schemes.

5.2.2.2 Technical Completeness: This element considers how well the proposal addresses coordination of such technical portions of the design as acoustic control and separation, life safety improvements, natural lighting control, and HVAC system design with the building aesthetics and architectural design. While the proposers are not required to design each system, this element considers whether these technical components have been considered and incorporated neatly and systemically into the proposal.

Section 00 22 20 Page 6

5.3 VOLUME 1- TAB B – SUBFACTOR 2 - QUALITY OF BUILDING SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS

5.3.1 General. As part of this Subfactor, the Government has identified certain items as desirable features.

Desirable features are identified below in the evaluation criteria. These items, along with any Offeror-identified betterment, will be given additional consideration during the evaluation process, provided that they are included in the proposed base price and are within the contract cost limitation (CCL) identified in the Solicitation.

Preferred Item: Proposals addressing the minimization of snow shedding risk will receive additional consideration.

Preferred Item: Proposals which incorporate improved daylighting and improved artificial light controls will receive additional consideration.

Preferred Item: Proposals which include higher ceilings in living units than required will receive additional consideration.

Preferred Item: Proposals which include higher ceilings in public spaces than required will receive additional consideration.

Preferred Item: Proposals which provide more obvious wayfinding and shorter and/or more articulated corridors will receive additional consideration.

5.3.2 Submission Requirements:

5.3.2.1 Presentation Drawings There are no specific drawings requirements for this Subfactor. However, the Offeror has the option of providing concept level drawing information for specific materials and/or systems which the Offeror feels are necessary to describe the proposed systems or materials in the drawings provided under Tab A.

5.3.2.2 Technical Approach Narrative:

Provide technical approach narrative, both qualitative and quantitative, defining the elements of the proposal. It is the responsibility of the proposer to ensure that all aspects identified in the evaluation criteria below are addressed.

Maximum total length for the narrative shall be ten (10) typewritten pages.

(a) Architectural Finishes: Describe how the materials selected provide for a suitable environment for the expected population of the facility. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Narrative should focus on durability and maintenance of the finishes proposed. Provide duration of roof system warranty.

(b) Structural Systems: Describe design loads and structural member and wall framing deflection limits used for design. Describe the building's gravity system and lateral system. Describe exterior wall systems and building foundation. Discuss measures used to limit cracking in veneer, walls, and slabs- on-grade. Discuss measures used to prevent slabs-on-grade from delaminating.

(c) Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems/Mechanical Systems: Describe how the

Section 00 22 20 Page 7 mechanical/HVAC systems proposed provide for a highly efficient environmental control system including provisions for indoor air quality. Discuss how these selections provide value to the

Government and how they address the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Focus the narrative upon maintenance considerations, limiting energy consumption and suitability of the proposed system for the expected use.

(d) Electrical Systems: Describe how the electrical systems provide for an efficient electrical system.

Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Discuss how these selections improve energy efficiency of the building. Narrative should focus on maintenance, modernization, and safety considerations.

(e) Plumbing Systems: Describe how plumbing systems selected provide for a highly efficient domestic hot water system and an efficient piping system. Discuss how these selections provide value to the

Government and how they address the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Focus the narrative upon maintenance considerations, limiting energy consumption and suitability of the proposed system for the expected use.

(f) Fire Protection Systems: Describe fire suppression, detection and alarm systems with associated site and equipment needs. Discuss general life safety and building code implications. Discuss how the system provides value to the Government and addresses the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Focus the narrative upon maintenance considerations and how the proposed systems will interface with existing and future facilities.

(g) Interoperability: Describe how systems integrated into the new work will interface with existing installation-wide systems. As a minimum, discuss the following systems: Fire Alarm, Mass

Notification, Telephone, Cable Television, Utilities Monitoring Control System (UMCS), and privatized utility companies where applicable.

(h) Security: Describe how secure areas will effectively meet and protect the mission, including how the various areas of the building will be secured, how cable runs will be safeguarded, and how intrusion detection will operate. Provide a schedule and certification process demonstrating how, when and what will be approved. Discuss how the building communications systems and electrical systems will be kept secure and tamper-free.

5.3.2.3 Proposed Material Identifications:

In the proposed material identification submission, the Offeror shall include only major materials in each of the areas shown below (there is no need to include materials such as fasteners, adhesives, wire, etc.). Provide this information in tabular form supported by catalog information. Table should include manufacturer’s name, model number if known or at least model series, length of warranty, size/capacity (where available), efficiency (where applicable), country of origin and any other notes or information selected by the Offeror. Catalog cuts shall be organized and tabbed in accordance with the disciplines listed below and each section shall contain a table of contents identifying the products included. On catalog cut sheets that show more than one product, clearly identify the specific product proposed for this project. Provide only one hard copy of catalog cut sheets with original proposal.

Section 00 22 20 Page 8

The Government will evaluate and consider materials and equipment proposed by brand name and model series or number as a quality standard. Unless substitution of a manufacturer, brand name or model is otherwise specifically prohibited in the contract, if the successful Offeror desires to substitute manufacturers, brand names or models after award, the substituted product must meet the contract requirements and be approved by the designer of record and the Government as equal in function, performance, quality, and salient features to that initially proposed.

Acceptance of the proposal is not a guaranty that the proposed products meet the contractual requirements. See below under Evaluation Criteria for more explanation.

(a) Architectural Components

▪ Interior Wall Surface Finishes and Protection Items

▪ Floor Finishes

▪ Ceiling Finishes and Configurations

▪ Cabinet and Countertop Materials and Finishes

▪ Hardware Systems (not individual hardware sets)

▪ Door and Storefront Systems and Types (not individual doors)

▪ Guard- and Handrailing Systems and Types

▪ Roofing Systems

▪ Window and/or Curtain Wall Systems/Types

▪ Insulation Systems

▪ Any special features

(b) Mechanical Systems

▪ Central Heating/Cooling Equipment

▪ Pumps

▪ Air Handling Equipment

▪ HVAC System Control Equipment

▪ Energy Conservation Features

▪ Kitchen Ventilation Equipment

▪ Heat Exchangers

(c) Plumbing Systems

▪ Fixtures

▪ Domestic Hot Water Generator

(d) Electrical Systems

▪ Lighting Fixtures

▪ Main Switchgear and Panels

▪ Fire Alarm, DDC and Mass Notification Systems

▪ Data, Telephone, Cable TV, Intercom, CCTV, and Other Special Systems as Identified in the

SOW

(e) Fire Protection Systems

▪ Fire Protection and Alarm System

5.3.2.4 Quality Improvements:

Provide a list of quality improvements that are above the minimum stated in the performance specifications.

Develop the following table, or similar, to identify desirable features (see 5.2.2.2), preferable items (see 5.3.1) and other Offeror identified betterments (mark appropriate column). Desirable features, preferable items and offeror identified betterments shall be included in the following table only if included in the base price.

Section 00 22 20 Page 9

Preferred

Item

Contractor

Betterment

Concise Description of

Improvement in Quality

Location of catalog information (page number)

Architectural

Components

Structural

Components

Plumbing Systems

HVAC Systems

Electrical Systems

Fire Protection

Systems

5.3.3 Evaluation Criteria:

5.3.3.1 General: It is the Army’s objective that this building will have a 50-year useful life. The design and construction should provide an appropriate level of quality to ensure the continued use of the facility over that time period with the application of reasonable preventative maintenance and repairs that would be industry-acceptable to a major civilian sector project Owner. The Army may repurpose the building or perform a major renovation at some point over that 50-year life; the design of systems should be flexible and adaptable to possible future uses different than the current to the extent practical, while still meeting operational and functional requirements defined within the Scope of Work. It is assumed that mechanical and electrical systems and interior architectural finishes shall perform for an average of 20 to 30 years with minor repairs and without replacement; historically the

Army repurposes a facility once in the first 25 years. The Government will evaluate the Offeror selected systems and components proposed in terms of extended warranties provided, maintenance considerations (frequency, cost, access, equipment locations), operability (ease of use, placement of control features, simplicity), durability

(withstanding warfighter usage, ease of cleaning), sustainability, and energy consumption (particularly HVAC, lighting, and power). Residential or similar grade finishes and materials are not acceptable for inclusion in this proposal. Acceptance of the proposal is not a guaranty that the proposed products meet the contractual requirements or that they are the appropriate size or application for the design which will be developed after award.

The intent during the proposal submission and review process is not to require detailed design effort or to perform a detailed design engineering review but to focus on the proposed quality levels of materials and systems. If the

Government evaluators have actual knowledge or strong suspicion that a proposed product or solution is inappropriately sized, being used in the wrong application or otherwise won’t meet the contract requirements, the

Government will inform the proposer in the event that discussions are conducted with the firm. But the

Government is not asking for design analyses in the proposal and is not obligated to perform an engineering design review at this stage. After award, in the event of conflict between the contractor’s accepted proposal and the requirements in the final, amended RFP, the order of precedence is indicated in SCR-DB040, “Design-Build

Order of Precedence.”

5.3.3.2 The Government encourages the Offeror to place emphasis on those design features which optimize and

Section 00 22 20 Page 10 emphasize functional/operational requirements; interior/exterior finishes and systems; and life cycle/ energy efficiency. The Offeror may choose the most economical Type of Construction allowed by the Building Code for this occupancy/project and put the money into durable finishes and efficient systems. The features that the

Government has identified below as preferred items. The items that the Government has identified in paragraph

5.3.1 as preferable and Offeror-identified betterments may be given additional consideration during the evaluation process provided they are included within contract cost limitation identified in the Solicitation and the offeror’s proposed base contract price. The order of importance for proposed betterments for rating purposes is as follows:

preferred items and other Offeror identified betterments. The Government will identify those offeror-identified betterments that are not desired, or are otherwise objectionable or unacceptable, if discussions are conducted with that Offeror. Unsubstantiated claims or narrative information will not be given evaluation credit during the evaluations. The following elements (not rated separately) will be considered in the evaluation of the building systems and materials of the various facilities:

(a) Architectural Finishes, Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include finishes, components and systems which provide usable spaces for the intended purposes. Proposals will receive additional consideration for materials and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility. Preferred items include:

• Increased exterior envelope insulation efficiencies

• Better quality fixtures and fittings.

• Improved quality cabinetry and countertops.

• Higher quality ceiling materials.

• Increased R-values for exterior wall panels; high efficiency windows and doors.

• Welded door frames in heavy use/mechanical/shop/storage areas.

(b) Mechanical Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic environmental control function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, reduce energy consumption, sustainability, maintainability (cyclical maintenance, access, equipment placement), and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

(c) Plumbing Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility. Preferred items include:

• Lifetime domestic hot water storage tank warranty

• High efficiency equipment

• Easy/local availability of replacement/repair parts to allow repair without building shutdown.

(d) Electrical Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, Section 00 22 20 Page 11 durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility. Preferred items include:

• Additional telephone/data/cable TV outlets.

(e) Fire Protection and Alarm Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic suppression, detection, alarm, and life safety functions necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems that improve life safety, include extended warranties, improved maintainability, longer life expectancies, and improved interface with existing and future facilities.

(f) Interoperability: Fire Alarm, Telephone, Cable Television, Mass Notification System, UMCS and privatized utility systems (where applicable) must be integrated into the facilities which require connection and interface with existing installation-wide systems and must be accommodated in the proposed project.

5.4 VOLUME 1 - TAB C – SUBFACTOR 3 – SITE DESIGN

Layout of site as shown in the RFP is conceptual; however, the overall layout of the primary parking lot to the North, the access on the West side, and the orientation of the building must be maintained. Design shall meet the Army Standard. Offerors are expected to propose a site design which meets the requirements of the RFP while taking into account the existing site features and potential obstacles, including utilities. The basic layout shown in the RFP shall be utilized with only minor changes. If the offeror identifies an existing utility that needs to be relocated to provide sufficient clearance for proposed site improvements, the offeror shall identify the specific utility feature(s) that needs to be relocated.

5.4.1. Submission Requirements:

5.4.1.1. Presentation Drawings: Limit presentation drawings to no more than five (5) drawings to include the following:

• Schematic/Conceptual Site Plans(s) for the Barracks Facility showing building, paving, walks, landscaping, drainage, utilities, and communications infrastructure. Indicate building setbacks and separations, which must meet anti-terrorism design requirements. Delineate vehicle and pedestrian access to allow evaluation of the integration of this new development into the existing surrounding infrastructure.

5.4.1.2. Technical Approach Narrative: Provide a technical approach narrative, both qualitative and quantitative, defining the elements of the proposed site design. Begin the narrative with a preface concerning the design concepts, providing the design rationale and basis of the proposal. It is the responsibility of the offeror to ensure that all aspects identified in the evaluation criteria below are addressed. Narrative shall not exceed five (5) pages.

(a) Geotechnical Considerations

• Soil compaction method

(b) Grading

Section 00 22 20 Page 12

• Drainage patterns

• Stormwater on site retention considerations

(c) Landscaping

• Plant Material Selection

• Site Lighting Considerations

(d) Pedestrian/ Circulation

• Development of Circulation Patterns

• Way Finding Between Facilities

• Separation from Vehicular Circulation

• Vehicular Circulation

• Parking Lot Configuration

(e) Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection

• Compliance with the Statement of Work Requirements.

5.4.2. Evaluation Criteria:

5.4.2.1. This Subfactor considers the overall layout of the site. The proposed site development plan must incorporate all the specific requirements from the Statement of Work as well as comply with all statutory and regulatory requirements outlined therein. All site related Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (ATFP) considerations must be included and/or addressed in the proposal.

Elements (1) through (4) below are of equal importance and are not separately rated.

(1) Geotechnical Considerations: Acceptable proposals include sound method of soil compaction and address liquefaction and other geotechnical issues. Proposal will be evaluated on measures planned to protect existing buildings and utilities as well as measures to repair damage caused by compaction.

(2) Grading and Landscaping: Acceptable proposals include reasonable amounts of cut/fill and regrading as necessary to ensure proper drainage and positive drainage away from the facility. Landscaping provided must meet the minimums required by the Statement of Work. Proposals which include innovative solutions to storm water management, landscaping to enhance the surrounding environment, or other similar improvements beyond the basic requirements will receive additional consideration during the proposal evaluation process. The following desirable criteria will also receive additional consideration:

• Preferred Item: Ease of snow removal and storage

(3) Pedestrian Circulation: Acceptable proposals address and include all the specific requirements of the

Statement of Work. The following items will be considered with respect to pedestrian and vehicle circulation. These are not sub-factors. AM#03…

Section 00 22 20 Page 13

• Desirable: Do shuttle buses and delivery vehicles pulling out disrupt the traffic flow?

• Does the proposed sidewalk system provide direct, convenient access to the facility?

• Desirable: Does the traffic layout minimize disruption to gym traffic? ...AM#03

(4) ATFP Considerations: This element verifies the proposal’s inclusion/compliance with the site related

(setbacks, etc.) ATFP constraints included in the Statement of Work. The proposal must be compliant with the ATFP requirements of the Statement of Work to be considered for award. Acceptable proposals are compliant with all ATFP requirements. Acceptance of the successful proposal does not constitute acceptance of design that does not conform to ATFP requirements. The final design must comply with the

ATFP requirements.

5.5 VOLUME 1 - TAB D – SUBFACTOR 4 – PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND SUMMARY

SCHEDULE

5.5.1 Submission Requirements:

5.5.1.1 Proposed Contract Duration: The offeror shall propose the contract duration where indicated in the

Proposal Schedule and in the narrative provided under this Tab. Proposed contract duration shall not exceed the maximum contract duration specified in FAR 52.211-10.

5.5.1.2 Summary Schedule: Submit a summary level schedule for integrated design and construction. Schedules or diagrams may be provided separately in a size that is easily read, but shall be bound and clearly labeled as Tab D.

This summary schedule will, after contract award, be replaced with a project schedule as required by Section 01 32

01.00 10: Project Schedule. The summary schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved. For proposal purposes, utilize a Notice to Proceed date of 31August 2022. This date is solely to assist in evaluation of offeror’s proposals and shall not be construed as a contractual NTP date. Offeror may use a critical path or other method of his choice; however, schedules shall be graphically represented. The proposed project schedule shall reflect the proposed contract duration. Give attention to the following features but limit narrative information to no more than three (3) pages total:

(1) Narrative:

(a) Provide the proposed contract duration.

(b) Provide a narrative, describing the design packaging plan for separate design packages, based on the Offeror’s plan for fast tracking. Describe all design and construction to be “fast-tracked” (See section

01 33 16.00 29: Design After Award). If long lead item equipment must be ordered prior to completion of a design phase, describe the requirement in the narrative and show the required ordering date in the schedule.

(c) Describe how construction phasing will be executed to meet the requirements in the RFP and ensure construction obligations will not outpace the available incremental funding identified in the DFARS Clause 252.232-7007

Section 00 22 20 Page 14

LIMITATION OF GOVERNMENT'S OBLIGATION.

(d) Complete the following matrix summarizing the proposed design package review schedule (not included in schedule narrative page limit).

Submittal Package Name

(e.g. Site / Utilities)

Stage (Interim, Final, Design Complete)

Submittal

Date

Review

Start Date

Review

End Date

Review Conference

Date (if applicable)

(2) Summary Schedule:

(a) Show the design phase, including events associated with coordinating the interim and final design submittals for each package and the proper handling of the review comments for each design package (See section 01 33 16.00 29). For each submittal package noted in 5.4.1.2(1)(c) above, show date submitted to

Government, Government review period and Review Conference on summary schedule.

(b) Show the overall construction phase for the facility and for utilities. Show fast track starts for design packages but it isn’t necessary to show the detailed breakdown construction (e.g., by trades) of the facility, site work and utilities.

(c) Show commissioning activities.

(d) Show turnover of the facility. Identify any proposed phased turnovers. The time to complete the facility and turnover to the Government must consider the requirement for the Contractor’s CQC completion inspection and the subsequent joint Contractor-Government turnover inspections.

(e) Constraints: Offeror must demonstrate the capability and flexibility to plan and schedule the complete project to meet the proposed contract completion period. Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented (e.g., labor or material availability, permits, weather, etc.). Indicate the anticipated overall critical path on the schedule.

(f) For each work activity, identify under which incremental funding stream, by FY as noted in DFARS

Clause 252.232-7007, it is intended to be funded by.

5.5.2 Evaluation Criteria:

5.5.2.1 Proposed Contract Duration: The offeror’s proposed contract duration will become the contractually binding completion period and will replace the duration stated in FAR 52.211-10 upon contract award. The

Government will evaluate the contract duration, as proposed by the offeror under this Tab and in the Proposal

Schedule, not to exceed the maximum allowed duration stated in FAR 52.211-10. In assessing the reasonableness of the proposed contract duration, the Government may take into account how well the proposed summary schedule supports the proposed duration, as well as use other information, such as but not limited to independent judgment concerning logic, constraints and typical construction durations. A proposed contract duration matching the maximum allowed contract duration is “acceptable.” A proposed contract duration shorter than the maximum

Section 00 22 20 Page 15 allowed duration will receive additional rating consideration, provided it is realistic, a minimum of two weeks shorter in duration and deemed to be achievable. The Government will consider an unreasonably condensed contract duration, which places additional cost or schedule risk on the Government, or which may create a risk of contract or performance failure, as a significant weakness or a deficiency, depending upon the evaluators' judgment.

Include all significant milestones to include design schedule, demolition, long lead items, commissioning and both pre-final and final inspections in the submitted schedule.

5.5.2.2 Summary Schedule: In addition to the proposed contract duration, the Government will evaluate the summary schedule for integrated design and construction. The length of the schedule must match the Offeror’s proposed contract duration. If it is shorter than the proposed contract duration, it offers no advantage to the

Government because it is non-binding, only representing a preliminary planned schedule. A schedule shorter than the proposed contract duration may indicate the Offeror is placing additional risk on the Government for any delays between the scheduled completion date and the required contract completion period. Therefore, the Government believes that there is no valid need to shorten the schedule less than the full proposed contract duration. The

Government will evaluate the schedule to assess the strength of understanding of the project scope, restrictions which must be considered in the schedule e.g., permitting (see section 01 10 00), long lead items, etc. The

Government will evaluate the strength of understanding of events associated with coordinating design submittals, reviews and incorporating review comments, the Offeror's capability to schedule the complete project within the proposed contract duration and the realism of the schedule. The Government will evaluate the design packaging plan for logic, reasonableness, how it facilitates meeting the proposed contract duration and how it facilitates the

Government’s ability to timely perform its design reviews. The packaging plan should minimize risk to the

Contractor and to the Government for tear-out and coordination for reviews. A schedule that offers advantage(s) to the Government over one that merely indicates an adequate understanding of the scope, restrictions, major milestones, and general understanding of the various events that can affect start and completion of construction will receive additional consideration.

5.5.2.3 For each work activity, identify under which incremental funding stream, by FY as noted in DFARS

Clause 252.232-7007, it is intended to be funded by.

6.0 VOLUME 2 – EXTENT OF PARTICIPATION OF SMALL BUSINESSES AND PRICE & PRO

FORMA INFORMATION

6.1 VOLUME 2 – TAB A – FACTOR 2 – EXTENT OF PARTICIPATION OF SMALL BUSINESSES

6.1.1 Submission Requirements:

6.1.1.1 All offerors shall identify the extent to which Small Businesses (SBs), Veteran-Owned Small Businesses

(VOSBs), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs), HUBZone Small Businesses, Small

Disadvantaged Businesses (SDBs) and Woman-Owned Small Businesses (WOSBs) would be utilized in the performance of this proposed contract. For small businesses, as defined by the North American Industry

Classification System (NAICS) Code applicable to this solicitation, the offeror shall identify their own participation as a SB, VOSB, SDVOSB, HUBZONE SB, SDB, or WOSB, and it will be considered in evaluating the proposed extent of participation of small businesses (use Attachment 5 – Extent of Participation of Small Businesses Format).

6.1.1.2 Offerors must propose goals for Small Business Participation. Small business participation goals are to be an estimated percentage of total contract dollars (total proposed amount including options). Provide an overall goal

Section 00 22 20 Page 16 to be accomplished through collective small business participation from any type of small business, to include all small business programs, and propose individual goals for each small business program utilizing Attachment 5. The work to be performed directly by a small business prime offeror will be included the offeror’s Small Business

Participation goal.

6.1.1.3 Separate and distinct from the Extent of Participation of Small Businesses, the apparently successful offeror upon request by the Contracting Officer in accordance with FAR 19.702(a)(1)(i) (if a large business) must submit a Subcontracting Plan, as required by FAR 52.219-9, under Volume 2, Tab D. If the apparently successful offeror fails to negotiate a subcontracting plan acceptable to the Contracting Officer within the time limit prescribed by the Contracting Officer, the offeror will be ineligible for award. The Subcontracting Plan will be based on subcontracted dollars rather than total contract dollars but shall reflect and be consistent with the goals and commitments to small business firms outlined in the Extent of Participation of Small Businesses

(i.e., dollars shown for each type of small business in each of the plans should match)"

6.1.2 Evaluation Criteria:

6.1.2.1 All Offerors (both large and small businesses) will be evaluated on the level of proposed participation of U.S. small businesses in the performance of the acquisition (as small business prime offerors or small business subcontractors) relative to the objectives and goals established herein.

6.1.2.2 A small business offeror receives credit for their small business participation as a Prime Contractor and can apply their dollar value for this prime performance when calculating percentages in all the applicable small business categories.

6.1.2.3 This factor includes a Total Small Business Participation goal (for all types of small business combined) of 20% of total contract dollars including all options for this acquisition. Higher offeror proposed goals which exceed the RFP specified goals will be considered more favorable during evaluation for this factor. Offerors proposed goals which are lower than the RFP specified goals will be considered less favorable during evaluation for this factor

6.1.2.4 The government will evaluate:

(a) The extent to which such firms, as defined in FAR Part 19, are specifically identified in proposals;

(b) The extent of commitment to use such firms (enforceable commitments will be considered more favorably than non-enforceable ones);

(c) The identified complexity and variety of the work small business firms are to perform;

(d) The extent of participation of small business prime offerors and small business subcontractors in terms of the percentage of the value of the total acquisition, and including options.

(e) The extent to which the offeror meets or exceeds the goals based on the total contract value. Goals for this procurement are:

Small Business (all types of small business combined) 20%

Small Disadvantaged Business Minimum of 5%

Woman Owned Small Business 3%

HUBZone Small Business 3%

Section 00 22 20 Page 17

Veteran Owned Small Business 2%

Service Disabled Veteran Owned SB 1%

(Note: A proposed Extent of Participation of Small Businesses that reflects a percentage of the contract value for WOSB would also count towards the overall Small Business Goal; and percentages for SDVOSB also count towards VOSB).

6.1.2.5 Adjectival Rating System Specific to this Factor: After listing this Factor’s proposal strengths, weaknesses, and/or deficiencies, the Government will assign an adjectival rating of “Outstanding,” “Good,”

“Acceptable,” “Marginal,” or “Unacceptable” for this Factor, which reflects the Government’s confidence in the

Offeror’s approach and understanding of the small business objectives of this acquisition as demonstrated in its proposal for this Factor. The adjectival ratings criteria for this Factor are defined as follows:

• Outstanding: Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

• Good: Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

• Acceptable: Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

• Marginal: Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

• Unacceptable: Proposal does not meet small business objectives.

6.2 VOLUME 2 – TAB B – FACTOR 3 – PRICE (STANDARED FORM 1442 AND CONTRACT

LINE- ITEM SCHEDULE)

6.2.1 Submission Requirements:

Submi…