MVA_QAs.pdf

PDF 36 KB Posted

Attached to
AWSM Zone 2 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
AWSM-Zone-2
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command TACOM Life Cycle Management Command

About this file

This document contains questions and answers regarding Military Vehicle Authority (MVA) submissions for the Army Contracting Command-Warren Regional Contracting Center (ACCWRN) MVA program. The questions and answers provide guidance for contractors on submitting previously approved MVA packages from other agencies, whether an Approved Business Relations (ABR) package from the Navy would meet requirements, and how to submit additional information if prior approval packages are missing current application requirements outlined in Announcement 0007. Contractors are responsible for ensuring all required information from the Announcement is included, even if submitting older approval packages. No products or services are specified in this document.

The purpose of this announcement is to provide answers to questions submitted regarding the Master Vessel Agreement (MVA) RFI.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to AWSM Zone 2, newest first.
File Type Posted
MVA_RFI_Rev_01.docx DOCX document
Annoucenment_0007_MVA_RFI.pdf PDF
DRAFT_AWSM_CDRLS_JUN_2019.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Maintenance-SLEP_SOW.PDF PDF
A-WSM_RFI_Z2-0001_Rev_01.docx DOCX document
A-WSM_Draft_General_Requirements.pdf PDF
A-WSM_Draft_General_Requirements_CDRLs.pdf PDF
A-WSM_RFI_Z2-0001.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

If the Contractor has an approved MVA with MICC, which transitioned to ACC‐WRN, can the contractor submit that as a previously approved package?

Yes, if the contractor has a previously approved package they can upload the previous package into DoD SAFE, ensure all certificates are up to date

Does an ABR with the Navy count as a comparable submission to an MVA?

Yes, if the ABR package includes the requirements identified in Announcement 0007.

If yes to any of the above, is a copy of the approved actual MVA agreement and/or a copy of the approved actual ABR acceptable? Or is the Government requesting an entire supporting package to those actual approved agreements to be sent?

The Government is requesting the entire package for approval, to ensure all inforamtion is up to date.

If the Government is asking for the entire supporting package that supports the approval of the actual agreement for the MVA or ABR, please note some parts of these packages don’t include all the current requirements requested in Announcement 0007.

Therefore, if Contractor submits these proposal packages as noted is allowable, would the Contractor be at risk of non‐compliance if they don’t meet all terms of the application for the MVA as laid out in Announcement 0007‐‐despite these packages were approved MVA packages from another Government Agency?

If a previously approved MVA package does not include the requirements identified in Announcement 0007, the contractor is responsible for providing the additonal information required by Announcement 0007.

MVA Q& A's

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .