Attch 20 - Past Performance Information Worksheet 30 Mar.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Maxwell-Gunter AFB Base Operations Support (BOS)
- Solicitation number
- FA300223R0009
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attch 21 - Past Performance Questionnaire 30 Mar.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attch 23 - PIEE Vendor Registration.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA300223R0009
Attachment 20 28 Mar 2023
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION WORKSHEET (PPI)
Submit information on recent contracts that you consider relevant in demonstrating your ability to perform the Maxwell-Gunter Air Force Base (AFB) Base Operations Support (BOS) Re-compete requirement. Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance. For a description of the characteristics or aspects the Government will consider in determining relevance, see Section M, Paragraphs M.3.1.6 and Table M-2 of the RFP. To be recent, the effort must have been performed during the five years preceding the date of issuance of this RFP, to include at least 12-months of documented performance during the five-year period. Contract performance that meets these criteria will be evaluated in their entirety. Contract performance that does not meet these criteria will not be evaluated.
Offerors may include efforts accomplished to resolve problems encountered on the referenced contract as well as efforts to identify and manage program risk. Merely having problems does not automatically equate to less than Satisfactory rating since the problems encountered may have been on a more complex program, or an Offeror may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to overcome the problems. The Offeror should clearly describe management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified.
Provide the information requested in this submittal for each contract/program being described. Limit the number of efforts submitted to no more than a combined total of six (6) contracts. The length of each worksheet submission is limited to no more than seven (7) pages. Past Performance worksheets do not count against the page limitation (60 pages) for Volume I - Past Performance.
This cover page should be deleted when submitting the Past and Present Performance Information Sheet.
Offeror Name (Company/Division):
CAGE Code:
Unique Entity ID:
(NOTE: If the company or division performing this effort is different than the Offeror or the relevance of this effort to the instant acquisition is impacted by any company/corporate organizational change, note those changes. Refer to the "Organizational Structure Change History" provided as part of the Past Performance Volume.)
Program Title:
Contract Title
1. Contract Agency or Customer:
2. Contract Number:
3. DO/TO Number (if applicable):
4. Contract Type:
5. Period of Performance:
6. CPARS Completed (Yes/No)?
If yes, at Basic Contract or DO/TO Level?
7. Original Contract $ Value*:
8. Current Contract $ Value*:
If amounts for 5 and 6 above are different, provide a brief description of the reason below:
*Note: Do not include unexercised options, for IDIQ contracts submit amount obligated at the DO/TO level, NOT the Basic Contract ceiling amount.
DO/TO Number: Refer to Section L, para L.2.3.7 regarding the submission of DO/TO’s and the Basic Contract for IDIQ contracts.
Brief Description of Effort as ___Prime or ___Subcontractor or ___Joint Venture
If Mentor/Protégé, indicate which this is for ___Mentor or ___Protégé
(Please indicate whether it was development and/or production, or other acquisition phase and highlight portions considered most relevant to current acquisition)
1. Completion Date:
2. Original date:
3. Current Schedule:
4. Estimate at Completion:
5. How Many Times Changed:
6. Primary Causes of Change:
D. Primary Customer Points of Contact: (For Government contracts, provide current information on all three individuals, in the format shown below. For commercial contracts, provide points of contact fulfilling these same roles.)
Program Manager
Name:
Office:
Address:
Telephone:
Email:
Contracting Officer
Name:
Office:
Address:
Telephone:
Email:
Administrative Contracting Officer
Name:
Office:
Address:
Telephone:
Email:
E. Address any technical (or other) area about this contract/program considered relevant to PWS Section 2, All Services (Program Management and Staffing). Enter N/A if not applicable.
F. Address any technical (or other) area about this contract/program considered relevant to PWS Section 7, Communications & Information Technology. Enter N/A if not applicable.
G. Address any technical (or other) area about this contract/program considered relevant to PWS Section 11, Operations Management. Enter N/A if not applicable.
H. Address any technical (or other) area about this contract/program considered relevant to PWS Section 12, Installation Engineering. Enter N/A if not applicable.
I. Address any technical (or other) area about this contract/program considered relevant to PWS Section 21, Airfield Management Services. Enter N/A if not applicable.
J. Address any technical (or other) area about this contract/program considered relevant to PWS Section 32, Weather Services. Enter N/A if not applicable.
K. Address any technical (or other) area about this contract/program considered relevant to any other PWS sections not identified above. Include the PWS sections that are applicable in this section. Enter N/A if not applicable.
L. If applicable, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods etc.
M. Describe the nature or portion of the work on the proposed effort to be performed by the business entity being reported here. Also, estimate the percentage of the total proposed effort to be performed by this entity and whether this entity will be performing as the prime, subcontractor, or a corporate division related to the prime (define relationship). Describe how the experience of the past efforts can be reasonably attributed to the proposed effort, when the proposal clearly demonstrates the resources (e.g., financial resources, overall oversight and management, or other resources) of the parent or affiliated division will meaningfully affect performance of the instant acquisition.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .