Attachment6_PastPerformanceQuestionaire.pdf

PDF 151 KB Posted

Attached to
Flight Line Tow Tractor (FLTT) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8534-22-R-0004
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Robins Air Force Base

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Flight Line Tow Tractor (FLTT), newest first.
File Type Posted
AFMC_Form158_Packaging_Requirements.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_ClientAuthorizationLetter.pdf PDF
Attachment4_SectionLFinal.pdf PDF
DD_1653_Transportation_Instructions.pdf PDF
FLTT RFP FINAL FA8534-22-R-0004.pdf PDF
FLTT_Ordering_Data.pdf PDF
Attachment6_PastPerformanceQuestionaireFinal.pdf PDF
Attachment_G_SpreadsheetFinal.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment5_FACTSSHeetandRelevancyTableFinal.pdf PDF
SOWFInal.pdf PDF
Attachment8_TransmittalLetterFinal.pdf PDF
CDRL_DD1423_Portfolio.pdf PDF
Attachment_9_ConsentForm.pdf PDF
Attachment10_SectionMFinal.pdf PDF
FLTT_CID.pdf PDF
FLTT Ordering Data.pdf PDF
Attachment10_SectionM.pdf PDF
DD Form1653 - Transportation.pdf PDF
SOW.pdf PDF
AFMC Form 158 - Packaging Requirements.pdf PDF
Attachment7_ClientAuthorizationLetter.pdf PDF
Attachment8_TransmittalLetter.pdf PDF
FLTT CID.pdf PDF
CDRL Portfolio.pdf PDF
Ltr to Industry.pdf PDF
FA8534-22-R-0004 Draft 01-18-2022.pdf PDF
Attachment_G_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SAttachment4_SectionL.pdf PDF
Attachment9_ConsentForm.pdf PDF
Attachment5_FACTSSHeetandRelevancyTable.pdf PDF
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION

SSP Attachment 06 – RFP Attachment B, Past Performance Questionnaire

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? Yes No

L. Contractor’s Role: Prime Contractor Subcontractor Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided.

Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

E V S M U N/A

1. Extent to which the company’s products met the requirements of the customer’s contract or project?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Configuration Management (first product delivered same as last product delivered):

3. Quality of Completed Product:

4. Overall management of Subcontracting efforts:

5. Quality of Technical Manuals or Commercial Manuals:

6. Customer’s Satisfaction with warranty response times and corrective actions:

7. Adequate Number of dedicated resources for your program:

8. Company performed independently without significant customer direction/oversight:

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION

9. Timely recognition and notification of administrative, engineering, production problems affecting the program:

10. Monitoring of Program Schedules and Critical Milestones:

11. Completed work on time:

12. Extent to which small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses and other socio-economic business sectors were utilized in the performance of the contract:

13. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.

14. Describe the contractor’s or company’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract.

15. Additional Remarks.

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

Yes Default Convenience Pending Terminations No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION

[ click and select an item ] award to him today given that I had a choice.

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .