Attachment J.2 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

25 KB Posted

Attached to
RE-POST: Stennis MS Mini Mart Cafe zero cost contract services
Solicitation number
040ADV-25-Q-0054
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire from the U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO) used to evaluate contractor performance across multiple dimensions. The form allows an evaluating organization representative to rate a contractor's performance using response codes ranging from Exceptional (EX) to Unsatisfactory (US) across nine key areas: quality of products/services, overall performance, schedule adherence, technical requirements, cost control, subcontracting, customer satisfaction (for routine and unexpected matters), and likelihood of repeat business.

The questionnaire is associated with a solicitation (RFQ #040ADV-25-Q-0054) for a zero-cost contract to provide Mini Mart Cafe services at the GPO's Stennis, MS facility. The contract will be awarded to a responsible offeror through a collaborative effort with the Mississippi Office of Vocational Rehabilitation for the Blind. Compensation for the contractor will be derived solely from food and drink sales, with no upfront cost to the government, in accordance with the Materials Management Acquisition Regulation (MMAR) 16.302.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
040ADV-25-Q-0054-C0003 Final.pdf PDF
040ADV-25-Q-0054-C0002 RFQ Amendment 10 24 25.pdf PDF
040ADV-25-Q-0054-C0001 09 26 25.pdf PDF
Attachment J.1 Prices list.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
040ADV-25-Q-0054 RFQ Solicitation 8.29.25 FINAL.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Attachment J.2 Past Performance Questionnaire

ORGANIZATION’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

U.S. Government Publishing Office Acquisition Services 732 North Capitol Street, NW Room A530, Stop: AS Washington, DC 20401

Email: Paige Menard at pmenard@gpo.gov

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR

1. CONTRACTOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS

3. CONTRACT NO.:

CONTRACT DATE:

4. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

4. PACE OF PERFORMANCE:

5. COMPLETION DATE:

6. CONTRACT VALUE $

2. PROJECT NAME:
7. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
8. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE

9. NAME AND ADDRESS OF EVALUATING ORGANIZATION:

EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION (Project Manager/COR/Other)

EVALUATOR’S PHONE NUMBER

MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:

Please check the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this Contractor:
EX = Exceptional VG = Very GoodS = SatisfactoryMG = Marginal US = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed
Quality of Products and Services- Assess the Contractor’s conformance to contract requirements.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Overall Performance- Assess the Contractor’s overall performance for the project.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Schedule- Assess the timeliness of the Contractor against the schedule of activities (as appropriate).
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Technical Requirements- Assess the Contractor’s ability and capacity to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Cost Control- Assess the Contractor’s willingness and ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Subcontracting- Assess the Contractor’s success at complying with subcontracting goals.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Customer Satisfaction- Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in ROUTINE matters.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Customer Satisfaction- Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in UNEXPECTED DIFFICULTIES.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Repeat Business- Assess the likelihood that you would want this Contractor to perform another contract for you in the near future.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O

List Contractor’s Weak Points:

List Contractor’s Strong Points:

List any other projects this Contractor has completed for you:

If an award fee contract, what was the average award fee % earned?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .