Attachment J.2 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 25 KB Posted

Attached to
GPO DC Procurement of Uniforms, Lab Coats, and Supplies, Laundering & Pick-up and Delivery Services
Solicitation number
040ADV-24-R-0067
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity. It requests information about a contractor's past performance on a specific contract, including details such as contract number, period of performance, contract value, and type of contract. The evaluator is asked to rate the contractor's performance in areas like quality of products and services, overall performance, schedule, technical requirements, cost control, subcontracting, and customer satisfaction. The evaluator is also asked to list the contractor's weak and strong points, as well as any other projects the contractor has completed for the evaluator. If the contract had an award fee, the evaluator is asked to provide the average award fee percentage earned.

The related federal contract opportunity is for the Government Publishing Office (GPO) to procure Uniforms, Lab Coats, and Supplies, Laundering & Pick-up and Delivery Services to support the Security and Intelligent Documents Division. This is a full and open competition, with a Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) contract anticipated. The procurement will utilize a Best Value Tradeoff process, and the Government intends to award one contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose proposal represents the best value.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
040ADV-24-R-0067-C0001_US.pdf PDF
040ADV-24-R-0067 complete RFP.pdf PDF
Attachment J.1 Pricing.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment J.2 Past Performance Questionnaire

ORGANIZATION’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

U.S. Government Publishing Office Acquisition Services 732 North Capitol Street, NW Room A530, Stop: AS Washington, DC 20401

Email: Shawnita Hamm at shamm@gpo.gov and Saulat Rehan at srehan@gpo.gov

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR

1. CONTRACTOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS

3. CONTRACT NO.:

CONTRACT DATE:

4. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

4. PACE OF PERFORMANCE:

5. COMPLETION DATE:

6. CONTRACT VALUE $

2. PROJECT NAME:
7. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
8. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE

9. NAME AND ADDRESS OF EVALUATING ORGANIZATION:

EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION (Project Manager/COR/Other)

EVALUATOR’S PHONE NUMBER

MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:

Please check the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this Contractor:
EX = Exceptional VG = Very GoodS = SatisfactoryMG = Marginal US = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed
Quality of Products and Services- Assess the Contractor’s conformance to contract requirements.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Overall Performance- Assess the Contractor’s overall performance for the project.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Schedule- Assess the timeliness of the Contractor against the schedule of activities (as appropriate).
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Technical Requirements- Assess the Contractor’s ability and capacity to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Cost Control- Assess the Contractor’s willingness and ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Subcontracting- Assess the Contractor’s success at complying with subcontracting goals.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Customer Satisfaction- Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in ROUTINE matters.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Customer Satisfaction- Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in UNEXPECTED DIFFICULTIES.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Repeat Business- Assess the likelihood that you would want this Contractor to perform another contract for you in the near future.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O

List Contractor’s Weak Points:

List Contractor’s Strong Points:

List any other projects this Contractor has completed for you:

If an award fee contract, what was the average award fee % earned?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .