Attachment J.2 - Past Performance Evaluation Form.pdf
PDF 20 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Legal Case and Document Management System
- Solicitation number
- DCSC-23-RFP-163
- Issued by
- District of Columbia Government
About this file
This document contains a past performance evaluation form for federal contractors. The form includes rating elements for quality of services, timeliness of performance, cost control, business relations, and customer satisfaction. Ratings are on a scale of excellent to unacceptable. The form requests information on the type of service received, contract number and period of performance from the evaluator. Space is provided for comments on excellent or unacceptable performance.
A second page of the form contains guidelines for assigning performance ratings in areas such as quality, timeliness, cost control, and business relations. Ratings range from zero for unacceptable to five for excellent performance. The form is used to assess and document a contractor's past performance on federal contracts.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT J.2
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
(Check appropriate box)
Performance Elements
Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unacceptable
Quality of Services/ Work
Timeliness of Performance
Cost Control
Business Relations
Customer Satisfaction
1. NAME & TITLE OF EVALUATOR:_______________________________________________
2. SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR:_______________________________________________
3. NAME OF ORGANIZATION: ___________________________________
4. TELEPHONE NUMBER OF EVALUATOR:_________________________
5. State type of service received: ___________________________________
6. State Contract Number, Amount and period of Performance _____________________________
7. Remarks on Excellent Performance: Provide data supporting this observation. (Continue on separate sheet if needed)
8. Remarks on unacceptable performance: Provide data supporting this observation. (Continue on separate sheet if needed)
RATING GUIDELINES
Summarize Contractor performance in each of the rating areas. Assign each area a rating of 0 (Unacceptable), 1 (Poor), 2 (Acceptable), 3 (Good), 4(Excellent), or ++ (Plus). Use the following instructions a guidance in making these evaluations.
Quality Timeless Business Product/Service Cost Control of Performance Relations
-Compliance with -Within budget (over/ -Meet Interim milestones -Effective management contract requirements under target costs) -Reliable -Businesslike correspondence -Accuracy of reports -Current, accurate, and -Responsive to technical -Responsive to contract -Appropriateness of complete billings directions requirements personnel -Relationship of negated -Completed on time, -Prompt notification of contract -Technical excellence costs to actual including wrap-up and problems -Cost efficiencies -contract administration -Reasonable/cooperative -Change order issue -No liquidated damages -Flexible assessed -Pro-active
-effective contractor recommended solutions -Effective snail/small disadvantaged business Subcontracting program
0. Zero Nonconformances are comprises Cost issues are comprising Delays are comprising Response to inquiries, technical/ the achievement of contract performance of contract the achievement of contract service/administrative issues is requirements, despite use of requirements. requirements, Despite use not effective and responsive.
Agency resources of Agency resources.
1, Unacceptable Nonconformances require major Cost issues require major Delays require major response to inquiries, technical/ Agency resources to ensure Agency resources to ensure Agency resources to ensure service/administrative issues is achievement of contract achievement of contract achievement of contract marginally effective and requirements. requirements. requirements. responsive.
2.Poor Nonconformances require minor Costs issues require minor Delays require minor Responses to inquiries, technical/ Agency resources to ensure Agency resources to ensure Agency resources to ensure service/administrative issues is achievement of contract achievement of contract achievement of contract somewhat effective and requirements. requirements. requirements. responsive.
3. Acceptable Nonconformances do not impact Cost issues do not impact Delays do not impact Responses to inquires, technical/ achievement of contract achievement of contract achievement of contract service/administrative issues is requirements. requirements. requirements. usually effective and responsive.
4.Good There are no quality problems. There are no cost issues. There are not delays. Responses to inquiries, technical/ service/administrative issues is effective and responsive, 5.Excellent The contractor has demonstrated an exceptional performance level in some or all of the above categories.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .