Attachment J.1. Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Côte d’Ivoire Sector Studies TVET Project Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 95332421Q0030
- Issued by
- Millennium Challenge Corporation
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and information on a related federal contract opportunity. The opportunity is a request for quotations issued by the Millennium Challenge Corporation to provide professional services such as updating a data collection instrument, developing a sampling strategy, collecting data from businesses in Côte d'Ivoire, and conducting preliminary analysis for two to three economic sectors. Offerors must submit quotes by April 23, 2021 and ensure the solicitation number is included in the email subject line. Questions are due by April 2, 2021. The award will be made based on technical capability, past performance, and price, where capability and performance are more important than price. The contractor will perform work in Côte d'Ivoire.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 06 - 95332421Q00300002__RFQ Amendment.pdf | ||
| 6 -95332421Q003 00001_RFQ Amendment.pdf | ||
| Attachment J.3 - Potential Impact of COVID-19.pdf | ||
| Attachment J.2. Travel Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 95332421Q0030_TVET RFQ.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ # 95332421Q0030
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
| Solicitation #: | 95332421Q0030 |
| Offeror Name: |
| Name of Reference: | |
| Title/Role: | |
| Email: | Phone: |
| Agency/Company: |
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
| Contract #: |
| Total Contract Value ($): |
| Period of Performance: |
| Was the Offeror Prime or Sub? |
Description of product/service provided:
RATING CATEGORIES:
| RATING |
| CODE |
| PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| Very Good |
| VG |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds several requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| S |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| M |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unacceptable |
| U |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Not Applicable |
| NA |
| Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed. |
ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS:
Using the rating categories on page 1, check the appropriate box for each assessment element and provide supporting narrative.
(1) Cost/Price Control – Rate the contractor's ability to control cost and deliver at the agreed-to price. Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.).
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
Supporting Narrative:
(2) Schedule Adherence – How well did the contractor adhere to the agreed-to schedule? What were the causes of any schedule variances? Were data deliverables and reports submitted on time?
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(3) Performance – Rate the contractor's ability to successfully comply with the contract requirements, statement of work, subcontracting plan, etc.
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(4) Quality – How well did the contractor adhere to the requirements of a Quality Assurance Plan or Performance Based Contracting requirements? Did the services provided meet the required level of quality or results?
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(5) Business Relations – Did the contractor exhibit reasonable/cooperative behavior in dealing with problems? Was turnover of personnel frequent? Rate the contractor's responsiveness to managing changes in providing replacement personnel.
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(6) Personnel Qualifications – Rate the contractor’s ability to staff and retain a highly-qualified team with the knowledge and experience required to successfully complete the project.
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(7) What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(8) Please identify the contractor’s strengths.
(9) Please identify the contractor’s weaknesses.
(10) Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again? Why?
CERTIFICATION:
I certify that the ratings and comments reflected in this questionnaire were made by the undersigned and are accurate to the best of my knowledge.
| ______________________________________ | ________________ | |
| [Enter Name of Reference] | Date |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .