Attachment J-04 Past Performance Questionnaire.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 20 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TWEEDS Draft RFP Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80GRC022R0013dRFP
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment to 80GRC022R0013dRFP (signed).pdf | ||
| Attachment J-03b Business Systems Reviews and Status Information.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SF33 TWEEDS dRFP_p.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-03a CAOT.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 80GRC022R0013 TWEEDS Draft RFP - 08222022_p.pdf | ||
| Draft Request For Proposal (DRFP) Cover Letter_p (signed).pdf | ||
| Attachment J-05 IT Security Applicable Documents List.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-03 Price Summary Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment J-01 Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-02 Data Requirements List.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
General Info
| Attachment J-04 | ||||
| Past Performance Questionnaire - Due NLT TBD | ||||
| Solicitation No: 80GRC022R0013 Technical Workforce Education and Expertise Development Services (TWEEDS) | ||||
| I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION | NOTE: BE SURE TO REVIEW ALL THREE TABS IN THE SPREADSHEET AND COMPLETE ALL THE REQUESTED INFORMATION!! | |||
| CONTRACTOR NAME: | CONTRACT NO: | |||
| CONTRACTOR ADDRESS: | Street | CONTRACT TYPE: | Indicate Below | |
| City | FIRM-FIXED-PRICE | |||
| State | COST REIMBURSEMENT | |||
| Zip | OTHER: (specify) | |||
| ACTIVE or COMPLETED | ||||
| ROUTINE or COMPLEX | ||||
| DATES OF PERFORMANCE: | From: | AWARD AMOUNT: | ||
| (*Current or Previous Contracts Only) | To: | TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE WITH MODS: | ||
| PROJECT DESCRIPTION: |
| Evaluator Name: | |
| Position or Title: | |
| Role in the Contract: | |
| Length of time involved with Contract: | |
| Email Address: | |
| Phone Number: | |
| Company Name: | |
| Company Address | |
| Street | |
| City | |
| State | |
| Zip | |
| Date of Questionnaire Completion | |
| II. AGENCY (CUSTOMER) IDENTIFICATION | |
| AGENCY (CUSTOMER) NAME: NASA Glenn Research Center | |
| POC NAME/TITLE/EMAIL: Stephanie D'Anniballe / Contracting Officer | |
| Stephanie.C.D'Anniballe@nasa.gov |
mailto:jeremiah.f.ocallahan@nasa.gov Definitions
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE RATINGS & DEFINITIONS
| Exceptional | Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good | Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory | Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal | Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory | Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| N/A | Performance does not apply |
Past Performance Evaluation NOTE: It is very important to keep in mind that only services currently being performed or completed during the past three years are considered relevant.
| III. PAST PERFORMANCVE EVALUATION | |||
| Please rate the Contractor as described below in the following performance areas: technical, cost, management and schedule. Provide a short narrative to explain why you chose the adjective you did. | |||
| TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE | Rating | COMMENTS: | |
| 1 | Offeror’s overall skill level and technical competence of personnel. | ||
| 2 | Offeror’s ability to identify and resolve problems (analysis of causes, impacts, and potential solutions). | ||
| 3 | Offeror’s ability to provide innovative approaches to challenges and/or utilize innovative technologies to support mission goals | ||
| 4 | Offeror’s ability to transition in response to changing organizational priorities | ||
| 5 | Offeror’s ability to deliver effective learning opportunities and knowledge sharing events | ||
| 6 | Offeror’s ability to support knowledge sharing and curriculum requirements | ||
| BUSINESS PERFORMANCE | Rating | COMMENTS: | |
| 1 | Offeror’s overall accounting proficiency (invoices match work completion status). | ||
| 2 | Offeror’s ability to provide realistic cost estimates in a timely manner. | ||
| 3 | Offeror’s ability to maintain accurate data and produce accurate reports. | ||
| MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE | Rating | COMMENTS: | |
| 1 | Offeror’s organization is structured to handle a highly fluctuating workload. | ||
| 2 | Offeror’s ability to select, manage and coordinate subcontracted efforts. | ||
| 3 | Offeror’s implementation of a successful phase-in activity. | ||
| 4 | Offeror’s quality control abilities (maintain schedules and time requirements, work quality, response to customer surveys, etc.). | ||
| 5 | Offeror’s effectiveness in communicating with all customers and stakeholders. | ||
| 6 | Offeror’s effectiveness in communicating with all customers and stakeholders. | ||
| 7 | Offeror’s ability to provide multiple options for consideration, including outcome and risk assessments, when making recommendations | ||
| 8 | Offeror’s ability to apply statistical methods and data analysis to inform recommendations | ||
| SCHEDULE | Rating | COMMENTS: | |
| 1 | Offeror’s ability to plan and provide realistic schedule estimates. | ||
| 2 | Offeror’s ability to identify and resolve schedule problems. | ||
| 3 | Offeror’s ability to submit reports and deliverables on schedule. | ||
| OVERALL EVALUATION | COMMENTS: | ||
| 1 | Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience? | ||
| If Yes, please explain the reason for the termination (e.g. inability to meet cost or delivery schedule, performance, etc…) | |||
| 2 | Are there any strong or weak points of contractor's performance you would like to share? | ||
| 3 | Would you select this contractor again? | ||
| If no, please explain why. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .