Attachment III - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 388 KB Posted

Attached to
Oily Water Separator System Support Services for NOAA Fleet Research Vessels
Solicitation number
1305M223QNMAN0056
Issued by

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation #: 1305M223QNMAN0056 Attachment: III

Source Selection Information

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT#:

Performance this information is based on)

_(Contract number of the Past

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Tamara

Horton no later than April 28, 2023 at 1:00 pm Eastern Time:

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor's performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the

Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

Solicitation #: 1305M223QNMAN0056 Attachment: III

Source Selection Information

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Source Selection Information

Solicitation #: 1305M223QNMAN0056 Attachment: III

3. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely mam1er. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Source Selection Information

Solicitation #: 1305M223QNMAN0056 Attachment: III

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater's Name:

Rater's Signature:

Date:

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Tamara

Horton, no later than April 28, 2023 at 1:00 pm Eastern Time:

Tamara.Horton@noaa.gov mailto:Tamara.Horton@noaa.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .