Attachment III - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 388 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1305M223QNMAN0056
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| RFQ Oily Water Separator System Support Service REV 1.pdf | ||
| Attachment II - Past Performance Information Form.pdf | ||
| Attachment I SOW.pdf | ||
| RFQ Oily Water Separator System Support Service.pdf | ||
| Attachment IV Price Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation #: 1305M223QNMAN0056 Attachment: III
Source Selection Information
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE CONTRACT#:
Performance this information is based on)
_(Contract number of the Past
Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Tamara
Horton no later than April 28, 2023 at 1:00 pm Eastern Time:
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor's performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the
Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
Solicitation #: 1305M223QNMAN0056 Attachment: III
Source Selection Information
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Source Selection Information
Solicitation #: 1305M223QNMAN0056 Attachment: III
3. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely mam1er. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Source Selection Information
Solicitation #: 1305M223QNMAN0056 Attachment: III
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater's Name:
Rater's Signature:
Date:
Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Tamara
Horton, no later than April 28, 2023 at 1:00 pm Eastern Time:
Tamara.Horton@noaa.gov mailto:Tamara.Horton@noaa.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .