Attachment I 15BNAS23Q00000037 Schedule B.docx
DOCX document 44 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Criminal Thinking Research Project
- Solicitation number
- 15BNAS23Q00000037
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SCHEDULE B
SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/SERVICES
The contractor shall be capable of providing Criminal Thinking Research Project:
15BNAS23Q00000037 – Criminal Thinking Research Project
| CLIN |
| Base Period (August 1 – July 31, 2023 ) |
| QTY |
| Unit |
| 0001 |
| Criminal Thinking Research Project Base Year |
| 1 |
| YR |
| 0002 |
| Criminal Thinking Research Project OY’1 |
| 1 |
| YR |
| 0003 |
| Criminal Thinking Research Project OY’2 |
| 1 |
| YR |
| 0004 |
| Criminal Thinking Research Project OY’3 |
| 1 |
| YR |
| 0005 |
| Criminal Thinking Research Project OY’4 |
| 1 |
| YR |
Invitational Travel as needed to perform the contract services and requirements. (All non-local travel related expenses shall be reimbursed in accordance with Federal Travel Regulations (FTR). The Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CRF) which includes FTR can be found at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/ECFR?page=browse. Travel shall be approved in advance by the COR and the Contracting Officer. Local travel and travel time within the Washington, DC metropolitan area shall not be reimbursed.)
The performance period for the resulting contract will be a a base period starting on the August 1, 2023 through July 31, 2024.
Decisional Rule Criteria Best Value Trade-Off:
The quoter’s quotation will be evaluated in three areas: Technical, Past Performance, and Price. Technical areas are more important than Past Performance, which in turn is more important than Price. Quoters should recognize that Price, although of lesser importance than Technical and Past Performance, might contribute substantially to the Source Selection Authority’s (SSA’s) contract award decision. As the evaluation of competing quotations in the Technical and Past Performance areas become more equal in rating, the more important Price will be come in selecting the best value for the Government. Technical and Past Performance areas will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 13.106-2(b)(3), Evaluation of Quotations or Offers.
The quoter’s quotation must clearly demonstrate, at the time of submission, unless otherwise stated, the capability to meet the Decisional Rule criteria. Quotations will be rated based on the Decisional Rule criteria – Best Value Trade Off. Quotations shall clearly demonstrate the capability to meet all of the following Decisional Rule criteria:
Evaluations will be rated under the following technical/risk rating matrix for Best-Value Tradeoff decisional rule criteria (4 Points - Outstanding, 3 Points - Good, 2 Points - Acceptable, 1 Points - Marginal, or 0 Points - Unacceptable).
Evaluation of quotations will follow procedures in FAR 13.106-2, Evaluation of quotations or offers, specifically FAR 13.106-2(b)(3), where it states, “if using price and other factors, ensure that quotations or offers can be evaluated in an efficient and minimally burdensome fashion. Formal evaluation plans and establishing a competitive range, conducting discussions, and scoring quotations or offers are not required. Contracting offices may conduct comparative evaluations of offers.”
The quoter’s quotation shall clearly demonstrate, at the time of submission, unless otherwise stated, the capability to meet the Decisional Rule criteria. Quotations shall be rated based on the Decisional Rule criteria. Quotations shall clearly demonstrate the capability to meet all of the following Decisional Rule criteria:
(1) Technical Approach, the contractor must address each of the following factors and sub-factors in their proposal:
1. The offeror demonstrates availability of a Project Manager with sufficient training, education, and experience to oversee project requirements outlined in this Statement of Work.
Offeror must submit resume/curriculum vitae for senior staff.
2. The offeror demonstrates experience conducting outcome research on psychological programs using advanced statistics.
Offeror must submit documentation of outcome research (to include data collection, and analysis) completed by personnel, including Project Manager.
3. The offeror demonstrates experience conducting research with justice-involved individuals and a working knowledge of correctional systems.
Offeror must submit documentation of such experience in the form of prison research (to include data collection and analysis) completed by personnel, including Project Manager and a resume/curriculum vitae for personnel, including Project Manager.
4. The offeror demonstrates experience publishing research findings in peer-reviewed journals and conducting presentations and/or obtaining grants relevant to the field of psychology exemplifying collaboration with other professionals in the field.
Offeror must submit documentation of publications, grants, and publications completed by personnel, including Project Manager.
PRICING
Prices quoted to the Government shall be as low as or lower than those charges to the supplier’s most favored customer for comparable quantities under similar terms and conditions, in addition to any discounts offered for prompt payment.
DELIVERIES
In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 16.505, and the clause located in FAR 52.216-18, Ordering, states that any supplies or services to be furnished under this contract shall be ordered by issuance of task orders by a warranted Contracting Officer in the National Acquisitions Section Contracting Office.
Deliverables will be sent to the attention of the Psychology Services Branch at the following locations with the following CLIN and Quantities:
The primary place of performance will be the Contractor’s facilities. At the Contractor’s request, contracting employees may visit a site relevant to the research being conducted (i.e., to see a Criminal Thinking group being conducted). The location of the visit will be determined based on geographic proximity to the Contractor’s location, availability of a Criminal Thinking group, and the ability of the facility to accommodate an observer. While visits are non-mandatory, Contractors will be encouraged to observe one or two Criminal Thinking groups in a facility.
Central Office 320 First Street, NW 400 Building, Suite 5009 Washington, DC 20534
CLIN 0001 – Criminal Thinking Research Project – 1 YR CLIN 0002 - Criminal Thinking Research Project – 1 YR CLIN 0003 – Criminal Thinking Research Project – 1 YR CLIN 0004 - Criminal Thinking Research Project – 1 YR CLIN 0005 - Criminal Thinking Research Project – 1 YR
BILLING INFORMATION
The Government will make payment on a monthly basis via Electronic Fund Transfer. Invoices with the contract number should be submitted electronically to CO-Businessoffice-S@bop.gov. Contractors that are classified as a small business are required to indicate their small business size status on each invoice submitted for payment.
AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS
Quoters are advised an award may be made without discussions. The Contracting Officer cannot overemphasize the necessity for the initial quotation of a quoter to provide the Government with sufficient information identifying the quoter's best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint.
Page 2 | 4
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .