Attachment H - Evaluation Matrix (EXAMPLE).xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 129 KB Posted

Attached to
Denver Health RFP# 1184 - Audit Services
Solicitation number
1184
Issued by
Denver County, Denver City, Colorado

About this file

The file is an Evaluation Matrix for the Denver Health and Hospital Authority's Request for Proposal (RFP# 1184) for Audit Services, involving multiple related healthcare entities including OMC QALICB, Inc., Denver Health and Hospitals Foundation, and Denver Health Medical Plan, Inc. The RFP seeks qualified auditing services for a healthcare organization, with a specific emphasis on candidates possessing comprehensive knowledge of healthcare services, including hospital facilities, outpatient clinics, Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC), physician services, and managed care perspectives.

The evaluation matrix details a comprehensive selection process with multiple weighted criteria, including past performance (30%), management plan (40%), ability to perform (15%), overall experience (10%), cost-consciousness (20%), interviews (25%), and fee considerations (25%). Evaluation will be conducted using a 1-10 scale, with key assessment areas including project meeting customer expectations, schedule maintenance, workmanship quality, professionalism, budget adherence, and minimal change orders. The selection process appears designed to thoroughly vet potential audit service providers through a multi-stage assessment that considers technical capabilities, experience, cost-effectiveness, and overall organizational competence.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PIPS Selection Criteria

PIP'S Selection Criteria
Contractor Selection
Past Performance & Management Plan CriteriaInterview & Final Selection Criteria
1) Ability to perform30%1) Ability to perform15%
2) Overall experience10%2) Past experience5.0%
3) Cost conscientious20%3) Cost conscientious10%
4) Management Plan40%4) Management Plan20%
100%5) Interview25%
6) Fee ($'s)25%
100%
Past Performance
1)Ability to perform4)Management Plan
Project meet customers expectations?Demonstrated ability to successfully complete project?
Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on time or early)?Current workload
Quality of workmanship?Proposed project schedule
Quality of materials?Qualifications of Key Personnel
Professionalism (actions & appearance of personnel)?Quality of Proposed Subcontractors
Was construction excessively disruptive?Knowledge of Project?
2)Overall ExperienceIdentified risks to addressed
Would you hire this firm again?Method of addressing risks
3)Cost conscientiousProposed methods of improving project?
Project completed within budget?Demonstrated similar projects?
Minimal change orders?
Was price appropriate to value received?5)Interview
Demonstrated similar projects?
Demonstrated familiarity with project?
Demonstrated qualifications of key personnel?
Demonstrated team concept with sub contractors?
Demonstrated knowledge of similar projects by sub-contractors?
Demonstrated ability to mitigate project risks?
Participation in project by firm's PM/Owner?
Proposed methods of improving project?
Comfort level with team leader?

Firm Performance Rating Sheet Performance Criteria Evaluation Data Sheet

INSTRUCTIONS - Please Complete The Following

1Fill in the EVALUATOR'S information.
2Verify to whom you are Evaluating is listed on Form.
3Scale each criteria 1 to 10, 10 being the best.
4Fax to:
Mr. Tom Sangster
Purchasing Director, Denver Health and Hospital Authority
Fax:303-436-3225
Phone:303-436-3298
RE: Performance Evaluation
Project Name, Project ###
Rate the Firm
EVALUATOR'S Name and CompanyPhone Number
Would not Hire AgainWould Definitely Hire Again
ItemPerformance Criteria12345678910
1Project meet customers expectations?10%
2Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on time or early)?10%
3Quality of workmanship?10%
4Quality of materials?10%
5Professionalism (actions & appearance of personnel)?10%
6Was construction excessively disruptive?10%
7Would you hire this firm again?10%
8Project completed within budget?10%
9Minimal change orders?10%
10Was price appropriate to value received?10%

Sum of Weights 100% 0

Name of Firm Being Rated

RFP Rating Sheet

RFP #

INSTRUCTIONS - Please Complete The Following

1Fill in the EVALUATOR'S information.
2Give ratings only for the areas listed. 1-100 rating, 100 being the best.
3Enter rating in white column to the left of the gray column for each category.
4Each line will calculate based upon the weight percentage listed.
5Rank Order Firms

EVALUATOR'S Name:

VENDOR #1VENDOR #2VENDOR #3VENDOR #4VENDOR #5 -
WeightItemRating Criterion
5%1General Information/Qualifications00000
20%2Value Added00000
30%3Scheduling00000
35%4Costs00000
10%5Contractual Agreement00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
100%TOTAL00000
00000

Rank Order

NOTES

VENDOR #1

VENDOR #2

VENDOR #3

VENDOR #4

image1.jpeg image2.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .