ATTACHMENT G - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE - NX EQ PHYSIOLOGIC VITAL SIGNS MONITOR.docx
DOCX document 19 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 6515--NX EQ PHYSIOLOGIC VITAL SIGNS MONITORS
- Solicitation number
- 36C10G23R0014
About this file
This is a combined synopsis and solicitation notice issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs seeking proposals for Welch Allyn brand name or equal physiologic vital signs monitors and related equipment. The VA requires monitors that can automatically measure and display two or more vital signs including noninvasive blood pressure, temperature, heart rate, and oxygen saturation. Key requirements are that monitors must have auto cuff deflation, be Cerner and VISTA compatible, include mobile and wall mounting options, connect to nurse call systems, and have a minimum five hour battery life. Proposed products must meet all salient characteristics outlined in the notice. Offerors may propose additional ancillary equipment. Proposals are due by June 23, 2023 with questions due by June 8, 2023. The notice establishes a single award requirements contract for base year with four option years to provide monitors for use in VA medical facilities nationwide.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C10G23R0014 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT D - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS - NX EQ PHYSIOLOGIC VITAL SIGNS MONITOR.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT F - PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE - NX EQ PHYSIOLOGIC VITAL SIGNS MONITORS.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G23R0014.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT A - PRICE COST SCHEDULE - NX EQ PHYSIOLOGIC VITAL SIGNS MONITORS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTACHMENT C - CONTRACT CLAUSES - NX EQ PHYSIOLOGIC VITAL SIGNS MONITOR.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT E - REPORTING TOOL - NX EQ PHYSIOLOGIC VITAL SIGNS MONITORS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTACHMENT B - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION - NX EQ PHYSIOLOGIC VITAL SIGNS MONITORS.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment G Past Performance Questionnaire
SOLICITATION NO.: 36C10G23R0014
DESCRIPTION: NX EQ Physiologic Vital Signs Monitors – Welch Allyn Brand Name or Equal
Offerors: Please Send to Each Reference Cited in Submitted Proposal (Maximum of Five References from Past Three Years)
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA)
STRATEGIC ACQUISITION CENTER (SAC)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
TO: Ninatile Bacote E-MAIL: Ninatile.Bacote@va.gov
VA SAC is currently in the process of awarding a contract for the solicitation described above. The offeror identified below has provided your organization’s name as a reference under the contract described below:
Offeror Name:
(Insert Offeror’s Name Here)
| Contract Number: |
| (Insert Applicable Contract Number Here) |
Please rate the offeror in each of the categories on this questionnaire. See “Rating Guidelines” section for detailed description of categories and ratings. There is room for comments where you deem remarks would be helpful to our evaluation (see ‘Comment from Reference’ under “Offeror Evaluation.” Please note that the past performance evaluators for this solicitation may contact you for further details in making a fair assessment of this offeror’s past performance. Thank you for your organization’s assistance in fairly evaluating offeror proposals for this solicitation.
Please E-mail Questionnaire to Ninatile.Bacote@va.gov by June 23, 2023, at 11:59 PM EST._
| Name of Reference: |
| (Reference Complete These Sections) |
Title of Reference:
Phone Number:
E-Mail Address:
Name of Organization:
Contract Period of Performance (Month/Day/Year Begin and End):
Total Contract Value (Base and All Option Years):
Options Exercised on Contract (Yes/No)?
Brief Description of Services/Commodity Provided by Offeror:
Show Cause Order Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
Stop Work Order Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
Termination for Convenience, Cause, or Default Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
Rating Guidelines:
| Rating |
| Quality of Service |
| Cost Control |
| Timeliness of Performance |
| Business Relations |
| 1: Unsatisfactory |
| Offeror is not in compliance and has jeopardized achievement of contract objectives |
| Offeror is unable to manage costs effectively |
| Offeror delays have jeopardized performance |
| Responses to inquiries and issues are not effective |
| 2: Satisfactory |
| Minor inefficiencies and errors have been identified |
| Offeror is usually effective in managing costs |
| Offeror is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Responses to inquiries and issues is usually effective |
| 3: Excellent |
| Offeror is in compliance with contract requirements and delivers quality services |
| Offeror is effective in managing costs and submits proper invoices |
| Offeror is effective in meeting and exceeding milestones and delivery schedule |
| Responses to inquiries have been effective and/or exceeded expectations and established deadlines |
Offeror Evaluation:
| Rating (List Number Based on Rating Guidelines Above) |
| Category |
| Description |
| Quality of Service |
| In compliance with contract requirements, submits accurate reports/deliverables, has effective personnel, and has achieved/maintained technical excellence: |
Comment from Reference: _______________________
| Cost Control |
| Has achieved efficiencies in costs, managed costs effectively, and has submitted timely/accurate invoices with supporting documentation: |
| Timeliness of Performance |
| Has met milestones, is reliable, is responsive to technical direction, and has completed milestones on-time or ahead of schedule: |
| Business Relations |
| Has maintained effective management of contract, has exhibited reasonable/cooperative behavior, is responsive to contract requirements, is responsive to inquiries/issues, and is proactive about resolving problems: |
| |_| YES |_| NO |
| Overall Satisfaction |
| Would you (reference) choose to work with this offeror again? |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .