ATTACHMENT F - Past Performance Questionaire - NX EQ Refrigerators Air Curtain.docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C10G24R0046
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity for NX EQ Refrigerators: Air Curtain. The solicitation number is 36C10G24R0046 and the contracting agency is the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Strategic Acquisition Center (SAC). The questionnaire is to be completed by references provided by the offeror, rating their performance on criteria such as quality of service, cost control, timeliness of performance, and business relations. The contract opportunity is a single award Requirements Contract for brand name or equal commercial item refrigerators to be used by VA medical centers nationwide. The associated NAICS code is 333415 - Air-Conditioning and Warm Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing. The procurement is set aside for Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs). Proposals are due by October 10, 2024 and the contract will have a 12-month base period with four 12-month option periods.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ATTACHMENT C - Contract Clauses - NX EQ Refrigerators Air Curtain.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT G - Past Performance Reference - NX EQ Refrigerators Air Curtain.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G24R0046.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT D Solicitation Provisions NX EQ Refrigerators Air Curtain.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT B - Contract Administration - NX EQ Refrigerators Air Curtain.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT E - Reporting Tool - NX EQ Refrigerators Air Curtain.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTACHMENT A - PRICE COST SCHEDULE - NX EQ Refrigerators Air Curtain.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment F Past Performance Questionnaire
SOLICITATION NO.: 36C10G24R0046
DESCRIPTION: NX EQ Refrigerators: Air Curtain – Victory® Brand Name or Equal
Offerors: Please Send to Each Reference Cited in Submitted Proposal (Maximum of Five References from Past Three Years)
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA)
STRATEGIC ACQUISITION CENTER (SAC)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
TO: Alex Beck E-MAIL: Alex.Beck1@va.gov
VA SAC is currently in the process of awarding a contract for the solicitation described above. The offeror identified below has provided your organization’s name as a reference under the contract described below:
Offeror Name:
(Insert Offeror’s Name Here)
| Contract Number: |
| (Insert Applicable Contract Number Here) |
Please rate the offeror in each of the categories on this questionnaire. See “Rating Guidelines” section for detailed description of categories and ratings. There is room for comments where you deem remarks would be helpful to our evaluation (see ‘Comment from Reference’ under “Offeror Evaluation.” Please note that the past performance evaluators for this solicitation may contact you for further details in making a fair assessment of this offeror’s past performance. Thank you for your organization’s assistance in fairly evaluating offeror proposals for this solicitation.
Please E-mail Questionnaire to Alex.Beck1@va.gov by October 10, 2024, at 11:59 PM EST.
| Name of Reference: |
| (Reference Complete These Sections) |
Title of Reference:
Phone Number:
E-Mail Address:
Name of Organization:
Contract Period of Performance (Month/Day/Year Begin and End):
Total Contract Value (Base and All Option Years):
Options Exercised on Contract (Yes/No)?
Brief Description of Services/Commodity Provided by Offeror:
Show Cause Order Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
Stop Work Order Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
Termination for Convenience, Cause, or Default Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
Rating Guidelines:
| Rating |
| Quality of Service |
| Cost Control |
| Timeliness of Performance |
| Business Relations |
| 1: Unsatisfactory |
| Offeror is not in compliance and has jeopardized achievement of contract objectives |
| Offeror is unable to manage costs effectively |
| Offeror delays have jeopardized performance |
| Responses to inquiries and issues are not effective |
| 2: Satisfactory |
| Minor inefficiencies and errors have been identified |
| Offeror is usually effective in managing costs |
| Offeror is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Responses to inquiries and issues is usually effective |
| 3: Excellent |
| Offeror is in compliance with contract requirements and delivers quality services |
| Offeror is effective in managing costs and submits proper invoices |
| Offeror is effective in meeting and exceeding milestones and delivery schedule |
| Responses to inquiries have been effective and/or exceeded expectations and established deadlines |
Offeror Evaluation:
| Rating (List Number Based on Rating Guidelines Above) |
| Category |
| Description |
| Quality of Service |
| In compliance with contract requirements, submits accurate reports/deliverables, has effective personnel, and has achieved/maintained technical excellence: |
Comment from Reference: _______________________
| Cost Control |
| Has achieved efficiencies in costs, managed costs effectively, and has submitted timely/accurate invoices with supporting documentation: |
| Timeliness of Performance |
| Has met milestones, is reliable, is responsive to technical direction, and has completed milestones on-time or ahead of schedule: |
| Business Relations |
| Has maintained effective management of contract, has exhibited reasonable/cooperative behavior, is responsive to contract requirements, is responsive to inquiries/issues, and is proactive about resolving problems: |
| |_| YES |_| NO |
| Overall Satisfaction |
| Would you (reference) choose to work with this offeror again? |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .