ATTACHMENT F - Past Performance Questionaire - NX EQ Milling_Drilling Machines.docx

DOCX document 19 KB Posted

Attached to
6520--NX EQ Milling/Drilling Machines: Dental (VA-24-00021843)
Solicitation number
36C10G24Q0118
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal solicitation. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Strategic Acquisition Center (SAC) is awarding a contract for NX EQ Milling/Drilling Machines: Dental - Dentsply Brand Name or Equal. The questionnaire is to be completed by references for offerors, evaluating their past performance on quality of service, cost control, timeliness, and business relations. The related federal contract opportunity is Solicitation No. 36C10G24Q0118, which is a combined synopsis/solicitation for the purchase of Milling/Drilling Machines: Dental issued as a Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) set-aside. The contract will be a single award Requirements Contract with a 12-month base period and four 12-month option periods. The solicitation lists 14 specific line items for the Dentsply A or equal Milling/Drilling Machines and related equipment and accessories. Offers are due by 1:00 PM EST on September 4, 2024.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment F Past Performance Questionnaire

SOLICITATION NO.: 36C10G24Q0118

DESCRIPTION: NX EQ Milling Drilling Machines Dental – Dentsply® Brand Name or Equal

Offerors: Please Send to Each Reference Cited in Submitted Proposal (Maximum of Five References from Past Three Years)

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA)

STRATEGIC ACQUISITION CENTER (SAC)

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

TO: Alanna Wilson E-MAIL: Alanna.Wilson@va.gov

VA SAC is currently in the process of awarding a contract for the solicitation described above. The offeror identified below has provided your organization’s name as a reference under the contract described below:

Offeror Name:

(Insert Offeror’s Name Here)

Contract Number:
(Insert Applicable Contract Number Here)

Please rate the offeror in each of the categories on this questionnaire. See “Rating Guidelines” section for detailed description of categories and ratings. There is room for comments where you deem remarks would be helpful to our evaluation (see ‘Comment from Reference’ under “Offeror Evaluation.” Please note that the past performance evaluators for this solicitation may contact you for further details in making a fair assessment of this offeror’s past performance. Thank you for your organization’s assistance in fairly evaluating offeror proposals for this solicitation.

Please E-mail Questionnaire to Alanna.Wilson@va.gov by September 04, 2024, at 1:00 PM EST.

Name of Reference:
(Reference Complete These Sections)

Title of Reference:

Phone Number:

E-Mail Address:

Name of Organization:

Contract Period of Performance (Month/Day/Year Begin and End):

Total Contract Value (Base and All Option Years):

Options Exercised on Contract (Yes/No)?

Brief Description of Services/Commodity Provided by Offeror:

Show Cause Order Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?

Stop Work Order Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?

Termination for Convenience, Cause, or Default Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?

Rating Guidelines:

Rating
Quality of Service
Cost Control
Timeliness of Performance
Business Relations
1: Unsatisfactory
Offeror is not in compliance and has jeopardized achievement of contract objectives
Offeror is unable to manage costs effectively
Offeror delays have jeopardized performance
Responses to inquiries and issues are not effective
2: Satisfactory
Minor inefficiencies and errors have been identified
Offeror is usually effective in managing costs
Offeror is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Responses to inquiries and issues is usually effective
3: Excellent
Offeror is in compliance with contract requirements and delivers quality services
Offeror is effective in managing costs and submits proper invoices
Offeror is effective in meeting and exceeding milestones and delivery schedule
Responses to inquiries have been effective and/or exceeded expectations and established deadlines

Offeror Evaluation:

Rating (List Number Based on Rating Guidelines Above)
Category
Description
Quality of Service
In compliance with contract requirements, submits accurate reports/deliverables, has effective personnel, and has achieved/maintained technical excellence:

Comment from Reference: _______________________

Cost Control
Has achieved efficiencies in costs, managed costs effectively, and has submitted timely/accurate invoices with supporting documentation:
Timeliness of Performance
Has met milestones, is reliable, is responsive to technical direction, and has completed milestones on-time or ahead of schedule:
Business Relations
Has maintained effective management of contract, has exhibited reasonable/cooperative behavior, is responsive to contract requirements, is responsive to inquiries/issues, and is proactive about resolving problems:
|_| YES |_| NO
Overall Satisfaction
Would you (reference) choose to work with this offeror again?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .