Attachment E- Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70B06C21Q00000005
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
U.S. CBP CBLE Remote Proctoring Services 70B06C21Q00000005
ATTACHMENT E
Past Performance Questionnaire
The company who provided your contact information is bidding on a Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection solicitation. Past Performance is an important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition, so your input is very important. Please provide an honest assessment to aid us in making an accurate determination.
QUESTIONNAIRE MUST BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN 12PM EST DECEMBER 9, 2020
PART ONE: GENERAL INFORMATION
1. CBP QUOTER/COMPANY BEING ASSESSED:
2. CUSTOMER ORGANIZATION/COMPANY NAME:
3. EVALUATOR:
| Name: |
| Title/Role in Contract: |
| Phone Number: |
| E-mail address: |
4. PROJECT TITLE:
5. CONTRACT NUMBER (if applicable):
6. CONTRACT VALUE:
7. CONTRACT AWARD DATE:
8. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
9. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES PROVIDED:
9.1 How many exams were administered on an annual basis?
9.2 Were the exams administered in-person or remotely?
9.3 What was the maximum number of simultaneous exam takers for any one test event?
10. WERE THERE ANY SUBCONTRACTORS? IF YES, PLEASE IDENTIFY THE PERCENTAGE OF WORK PERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTORS:
PART TWO: COMPANY PERFORMANCE RATING
On the following pages, please summarize the company’s performance for each rating factor as Acceptable/Unacceptable or Not Applicable. Adjectival ratings are defined below and should be used as a reference in assessing performance:
| ACCEPTABLE |
| Company’s performance met customer expectations or contract/task order requirements. |
| UNACCEPTBLE |
| Performance did not meet most (or all) contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE |
| No relevant past performance record is available for evaluation. |
| A |
| QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| Not Applicable |
| 1 |
| How was the overall quality of the program provided? |
| 2 |
| Did the contractor provide quality participant guides/handouts/leadership reference material (i.e., accurate, current, error free, and complete)? |
| 3 |
| Did the contractor provide timely and complete reports? |
| B |
| PROJECT MANAGEMENT |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| Not Applicable |
| 1 |
| Did the contractor provide effective task order and project management? |
| 2 |
| Was the contractor able to resolve performance problems without extensive guidance from counterparts? |
| 3 |
| How effective was the contractor in understanding and responding to changes in user requirements? |
| 4 |
| Did the contractor establish and maintain effective quality control standards and procedures? |
C
| PRICE EFFECTIVENESS |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| Not Applicable |
| 1 |
| To what extent did the contractor meet the price estimate? |
| 2 |
| Did the contractor effectively plan work to ensure maximum effective utilization of resources? |
PART THREE: EVALUATOR’S CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS FORM IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR
TITLE OF EVALUATOR
Once complete, please email this document to:
Jared A. Tritle Contracting Officer Mission Support Contracting Division- West U.S. Customs and Border Protection 317-381-5447 Jared.A.Tritle@cbp.dhs.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .