Attachment D.1 - Past Performance Survey.pdf

Attachment J.4 - Solicitation 75D301-20-Q-71779

Past Performance Survey

Please e-mail completed surveys to:

Iie3@cdc.gov to Attn: Candice L. Simmons

International Acquisition and Assistance Branch

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

2939 Flowers Road, Vanderbilt Building, Room 1207

Atlanta, Georgia 30341

Phone: (770) 488-1432 Fax: (770) 488-2670

The below contractor has submitted a proposal to provide the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with clinical trials and clinical research monitoring services on the treatment, diagnosis and prevention of latent tuberculosis (TB) and the study of active TB disease both domestically and internationally in response to solicitation

#75D301-20-Q-71779. This contractor has identified your contract listed below as containing like or similar services as required under our solicitation. Please complete this Past Performance Survey and fax it to the above

POC by the proposal due date in the solicitation.

Contractor Information:

a. Contractor Name:___________________________________________________________________________

b. Program Name:____________________________________________________________________________

c. Contract Number: __________________________________________________________________________

d. Contract Type: _____________________________________________________________________________

e. Contract amount:____________________________________________________________________________

f. Period of performance:________________________________________________________________________

g. Description and Location of work:

TO BE COMPLETED BY REFERENCE

a. Name of person completing this questionnaire: __________________________________________________

b. Signature of person completing this questionnaire: __________________________________________________

c. Your role with respect to the contractor (e.g., Contracting Officer/Contract Manager, COR/COTR, Program

Manager, etc.): _______________________________________________________________________________

d. Agency/company: ________________________________________________________________________

e. Telephone with area code: ________________________________________________________________

f. Fax number with area code: ________________________________________________________________

g. Date questionnaire completed: ________________________________________________________________ mailto:Iie3@cdc.gov

Objective Measurable Performance Iindicators

Excellent: Performance consistently exceeded contract requirements, customer expectations, and provided significant, unique or worthwhile features or benefits.

Good: Performance consistently met, and occasionally exceeded, contract requirements and customer expectations. Demonstrated an understanding of the requirements, provided an acceptable management and technical approach, and provided complete responses to customer needs.

Satisfactory: Met the performance level of the contract.

Marginal: Usually met the contract performance level, however at a marginal level. Performance could have been improved and occasionally fell short of customer expectations.

Poor: Performance did not meet customer expectations and/or contract requirements.

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating based on the objective measurable performance indicators listed above. Commentary to explain any rating can be noted in the margins or on an attachment.

1. Evaluate the contractor’s labor force in terms of overall qualifications to perform the work required.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

2. Evaluate the stability of the contractor’s work force as affected by employee turnover and contract vacancies.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

3. Evaluate how well the contractor conducted work in a smooth and responsive manner during the initial start up or transition period. Please indicate whether the work was transitioned from Government responsibility or another contractor’s responsibility.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

Previous Contractor Responsibility Previous Government Responsibility

4. Evaluate the contractor’s adherence to task schedules and mission requirements.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

5.Assign and overall score evaluating contractor’s overall ability to provide clinical research organization (CRO) monitoring support to clinical trials and clinical research performed by the Tuberculosis Trials Consortium or other

Trials Consortium of similar size, scope and complexity and with the same contract type (Time and Material) throughout a continuous five-year performance period. Address contractor’s experience and ability to provide emphasis to studies of latent TB infection in the United States, and studies of active TB disease both domestically and internationally, perform tasks for the planning, pre-study and TBTC-specific activities; TBTC clinical site management and monitoring; reporting; and internal quality assurance and audits. Provide narrative addressing contractor’s ability to provide the following: On-site initiation visits for all participating sites prior to first enrollment; On-site periodic monitoring visits; On-site close out visits; Tracking of monitoring activities and deficiencies; and Reports of monitoring findings.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

Narrative:_____________________________________________________________________________________

6. Evaluate the contractor’s responsiveness to technical direction.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

7. Evaluate the responsiveness and quality of the contractor’s reports and documentation.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

8. Evaluate the contractor’s ability to solve business management problems without extensive guidance from the procuring agency.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

9. Evaluate the contractor’s ability to overcome program, technical, or schedule difficulties without extensive guidance from the procuring agency.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

10. Evaluate the contractor’s willingness and ability to integrate as a team and work cooperatively with the existing work force (Government and/or other contractors).

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

11. Evaluate the contractor’s cost reporting and estimating system.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

12. Evaluate the contractor’s overall performance.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

13. Evaluate the contractor’s management of Time and Materials relattive to completion of the project as originally awarded.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

14.Would you be willing to have this contractor do additional work for your Orginazition in the future?

Yes_____ No______

Other Informational Comments:

Pro:

Con: