Attachment C - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 33 KB Posted

Attached to
6505--Ga68 NETSPOT Radiopharmaceuticals Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
Solicitation number
36C24425Q0362
Issued by

About this file

This file is a Past Performance Questionnaire template related to solicitation 36C24425Q0362 for NETSPOT Ga68 radiopharmaceuticals at the Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center in Philadelphia. The questionnaire is designed to be completed by contract evaluators to assess contractor performance across three main areas: Quality of Services, Timeliness of Performance, and Business Relations.

The evaluation form uses a five-tier rating system (Excellent, Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory) and requires detailed narratives for each performance element. Evaluators must assess the contractor's ability to provide qualified personnel, maintain equipment, implement quality control, meet response times, submit required reports, demonstrate problem-solving capabilities, and maintain effective business relationships. The form also asks evaluators whether they would award to the contractor again and requires an overall past performance rating with supporting documentation. This is a standard template that does not contain any completed evaluation information.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment B - Price Schedule.docx DOCX document
36C24425Q0362 - Solicitation.docx DOCX document
36C24425Q0362.docx DOCX document
Attachment A - SOW NETSPOT.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NUMBER – 36C24425Q0362

Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center (CMJCVAMC), Philadelphia, PA

THIS FORM IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE EVALUATOR. PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING IDENTIFYING INFORMATION, PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT, PDF, SIGN, AND DATE. PLEASE SEND THE COMPLETED FORM TO CHRISTA STINE, CHRISTA.STINE@VA.GOV.

I. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION:

Contractor:

Contract Number:

Period of Performance:

Negotiated price or cost at award:

Current estimated contract dollar amount:

Describe service acquired:

II. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:

Name:

Organization:

Phone Number:

(i.e., Contracting Officer, Program Manager, Contract Specialist/Administrator, Contracting Officer's Technical Representative, other, etc.)

Time on Contract:

III. ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS: Narrative statements are vital. Please provide a narrative for each element below and then an adjectival rating under Paragraphs III.A2, III.B.2, III.C.2, and an overall Past/Present Performance adjectival rating under par. III.F based on the Adjectival Rating Descriptions below. Attach additional pages if there is insufficient space in the comment space.

PERFORMANCE ADJECTIVAL RATINGS: Choose the appropriate adjective that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance based on the descriptions below.

EXCELLENT
GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements with most exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

A. QUALITY OF SERVICES

1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to provide qualified personnel (including experienced managers and/or supervisors), necessary equipment, which is properly maintained, quality control for performance of your contract, and contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions.

2. Rating for Quality of Services: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

|_| Excellent |_|Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory

B. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to meet the contract’sspecific response times and Contractor’s timeliness in providing anyadministrative reports/documents required by your contract.

2. Rating for Timeliness of Performance: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

C. BUSINESS RELATIONS

1. Narrative: Address Contractor’s willingness to improve and correct noncompliance issues and concerns. Describe Contractor’s ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner. Does Contractor display initiative and flexibility? Do Contractor personnel promote a strong working relationship with your agency/organization? Are Contractor personnel courteous and responsive? Do Contractor personnel interface effectively with your staff?

2. Rating for Business Relations: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

D. Identify the contractor’s overall strengths and weaknesses:

E. Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again?

YES |_| NO |_|

If no, please explain:

F. CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE RATING: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

Additional Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Name/Signature Date

Title

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .