Attachment C Digital Maturity Assessment.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 37 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Agile Digital Development ITQ
- Solicitation number
- 4400034815
- Issued by
- Pennsylvania
About this file
This is a Digital Maturity Assessment scoring matrix for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Agile Digital Development ITQ (Invitation to Qualify), designed to evaluate vendor technical capabilities in delivering digital solutions to Pennsylvania's executive agencies. The assessment evaluates seven key dimensions of digital service competency: Agile/Iterative Development, Human-Centered Design, DevOps, Security, Accessibility, Technical Proficiency, and Digital Service Playbook alignment. Vendors self-assess their capabilities across three maturity levels, with Level 1 representing limited understanding and application, Level 2 demonstrating compliance with general standards, and Level 3 reflecting comprehensive and proactive implementation of practices. The scoring system requires vendors to enter numeric values (0-3) in designated cells, with a zero indicating no support in a specific area and counting as a neutral score rather than a disqualification.
The assessment emphasizes that accurate self-scoring supports the Commonwealth's understanding of vendor strengths and areas for growth, ultimately enabling successful partnerships in delivering high-quality digital services. Vendors must register as Procurement Vendors with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, obtain a six-digit vendor number through the PA Supplier Portal, and complete all qualification requirements through the PA JAGGAER Portal, which is the only accepted method for submitting qualifications. The assessment includes requirements for vendors to provide supporting artifacts, links, examples, or case study references to substantiate their capability claims. This contract replaces the previous Agile Digital Development Master Contract 4400032059 with Contract 4400034815 as of June 24, 2026, and prohibits the purchase of hardware, software, and staff augmentation services.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Agile Development Terms and Conditions.pdf | ||
| Attachment B Agile ITQ Rate Card.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment D Enterprise Platforms.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment A Agile Development Scope of Work.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Introduction Digital Maturity Vendor Score Matrix
Technical Qualifications
Objective: Evaluate your company's technical capabilities in delivering digital solutions.
| Relevance: Demonstrates your company's ability to implement, manage, and support technical aspects of digital services, ensuring the government can rely on your solutions for efficiency and innovation. |
| Importance: Strong technical qualifications indicate your proficiency in critical areas such as software development, data management, cybersecurity, and user experience design, all vital for successful government projects. |
Steps:
| 1. Review Statements: Carefully examine each statement related to corporate capabilities. |
| 2. Honest Assessment: Reflect on your company's current technical expertise and resources. |
| Scoring: |
| Enter a "0" in a blank if your company does not provide that specific service. |
| Provide accurate scores for services you do offer to reflect your company's true capabilities. |
Supplemental Information: Provide links, examples, or statements that support your ranking if that information is not already provided in the DSC Case Studies.
Important Note
A lower score in some areas doesn't disqualify your application. This assessment helps us understand your company's potential to provide effective digital solutions to the government. It also identifies areas where further development may be beneficial, enabling us to support your growth and readiness for future projects.
| By providing accurate information, you help us better understand your strengths and areas for growth, ultimately supporting a successful partnership in delivering high-quality digital services to the public. |
| Source: Digital Services Coalition |
Technical Qualifications
| Digital Maturity Vendor-Score Matrix, Technical Qualifications |
| Scoring Instructions: Applicants shall enter the numeric value they self-assess their company for each level. Only enter in one score per column (e.g., Level 1 = 1 point, Level 2 = two points, Level 3 = three points). Enter the score in all the applicable Self-Score column(s) in the white cells. For the Technical Qualifications only- if you do not support the specific area - enter a Zero - and this will be counted as a neutral. |
| Dimension 1: Digital Service Concepts Maturity | Agile/Iterative Development | Vendor Self Score | Human-Centered Design | Vendor Self Score | DevOps | Vendor Self Score | Security | Vendor Self Score | Accessibility | Vendor Self Score | Technical Proficiency | Vendor Self Score | Digital Service Playbook | Vendor Self Score |
| Definiton | A methodology that emphasizes flexible planning, customer feedback, and continuous improvement through iterative cycles and collaborative cross-functional teamwork. It prioritizes adaptability to change and quick delivery of value to the customer. | Select One | An approach to problem-solving that involves the human perspective in all steps of the problem-solving process. It focuses on designing products, services, or processes with a deep understanding of the users' needs, behaviors, and usage contexts. | Select One | A set of practices that combines software development (Dev) and IT operations (Ops) aimed at reducing the system development life cycle and providing continuous delivery with high software quality. It emphasizes automation, collaboration, and integration between development and operations teams. | Select One | In the context of digital services, it refers to the measures, practices, and processes designed to protect networks, devices, programs, and data from attack, damage, or unauthorized access. | Select One | The practice of making your websites, apps, and digital content usable by as many people as possible, including those with impairments or disabilities. It involves designing digital products that can be used by people with a wide range of abilities and disabilities. | Select One | The expertise and competency in specific technical areas or technologies. This includes the use of programming languages, understanding of data management, and familiarity with AI/ML concepts, ensuring the ability to develop and manage digital solutions effectively. | Select One | The practices, strategies, and principles for delivering effective digital services in the government. It typically covers areas such as user-centered design, agile methods, security, and privacy, aiming to improve the quality and efficiency of digital service delivery. https://playbook.cio.gov/ | Select One |
| Level 1: Limited understanding or application | Traditional approach with minimal agility. Teams have basic understanding of iterative deployment but does not consistently apply an agile process approach | Limited user involvement in design. They do not engage or prioritze user-centric design principles | Basic Devops practices with familiarity of basic collaboration between dev and ops teams. Limited exposure to advanced automation and integration practices | May implement basic security measures but demonstrate a reactive approach to security. | Limited accessibility considerations with a compliance-based or reactive approach to implementing them. | Has limited exposure or use of a variety of programming languages, technologies, understanding of data management and AI/ML concepts | Teams have a basic understanding but lack depth in applying the principles | |||||||
| Level 2: Compliance with general standards and understanding | Basic understanding and adoption of Agile principles. Can apply both single and scaled agile practices based on function, solution, or strategy as appropriate | User research conducted, but improvements needed. They show awareness of user needs but may not fully integrate feedback loops in the design process | Integration of DevOps Practices are understood and integrated as a workflow. There is an awareness of importance of collaboration, communication and some levels of automation. | Actively integrate security practices into the dev and ops workflows. Understands the importance but does not have the full automation in place | Compliance with basic standards and implement standards to address fundamental accessibility requirements | Has demonstrated proficiency in core technologies and programming languages | Teams have a solid understanding of most principles but may need refinement in some areas | |||||||
| Level 3: Comprehensive and proactive understanding and application of practices | Mature Agile practices, continuous improvement, and collaboration. Can explain the concept of "why" agile | User-centric approach, regular feedback loops, and iterative design to show a deep commitment to creating user-centric experiences | Showcase advanced expertise to seamlessly integrate DevOps practices across the entire lifecycle. Proficient in advanced automation, emphasizing optimization, and efficient workflows along with strong collaboration skills. | Security is embedded throughout the development lifecycle as a seamless integration in the process. Emphasize proficiency in the automation of security measures. | Go beyond basic accessibility requirements to ensure comprehensive usability, considering diverse user needs and exceeding minimum requirements. | Demonstrated mastery in a wide range of programming languages and technologies relevant to current tech trends and legacy enviornments | Teams have a deep understanding of the core principles and apply it in solutions across the board. | |||||||
| Supporting Artifacts (please include file name or link to submitted artifacts for each category.) | ||||||||||||||
| Total Technical Qualification Point(s) |
https://playbook.cio.gov/ Sheet1
| Score |
| Select One |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .