Attachment B-Reference Check Form~3.doc

DOC document 61 KB Posted

Attached to
State Small Business Credit Initiative (SSBCI) Business Oregon Venture Fund Program
Solicitation number
S-12300-00010779
Issued by
Marion County, Oregon

About this file

This document is an Attachment B - Reference Check Form for RFP S-12300-00010779 - SSBCI Business Oregon Venture Fund Program. It is a form used to gather information about the proposer's previous work experience and customer service. The form includes questions about the types of services the proposer provided, their customer service, problem resolution methods, project timelines, and cost comparisons. Respondents are asked to rate their satisfaction with the proposer and the likelihood of using their services again. This reference check form is part of the procurement process for the SSBCI Business Oregon Venture Fund Program.

The pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding requirements, and other salient financial details are not included in this reference check form. This document focuses solely on evaluating the proposer's past performance and customer service based on feedback from previous clients.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]

ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

RFP S-12300-00010779 – SSBCI Business Oregon Venture Fund Program Att B

ATTACHMENT B - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

Proposer Name:

Reference Entity:

Reference Contact Name:

Contact Telephone Number:

Contact Email Address:

Please respond to the following questions:

1. For what type of services did you engage Proposer?

2. Describe the services listed in response to question 1.

3. Describe Proposer’s customer service.

4. Describe your satisfaction with the business relationship with Proposer.

5. Describe Proposer’s methods for problem resolution.

6. How likely would you be to use Proposer’s services again?

7. With which aspect(s) of Proposer’s services are you the most satisfied?

8. With which aspect(s) of Proposer’s services are you the least satisfied?

9. How well did Proposer stay within the proposed timeline?

10. How did the final project cost compare to the initial proposed cost?

Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014 DAS Procurement Services, Version 2.0 – December 9, 2016

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .