Attachment B_Ratings Tables.pdf
PDF 34 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912QR25R0003
About this file
This document contains the ratings tables and selection criteria for a federal contract opportunity issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Louisville. The opportunity is for a Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contract to provide architect/engineer services primarily for roofing and building envelope repair and replacement projects for the Army Reserve nationwide, including U.S. territories.
The key details are: the maximum cumulative contract value is $15 million for a 5-year contract period; the estimated construction cost per project is between $150,000 and $6 million; the selection criteria in descending order of importance are professional qualifications, specialized experience/technical competence, capacity, past performance, and volume of DoD A/E contract awards; and the submission deadline is December 16, 2024. Offerors must have an active SAM registration and may submit questions through the ProjNet system. Proposals will not be publicly opened and no information on the status of the evaluation or award will be available after receipt of proposals.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment A_Blank PPQ.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Ratings:
Evaluators will apply the adjectival rating for the definition that most closely matches the evaluation.
TABLE 1
Professional Qualifications, Specialized Experience/Technical Competence, Capacity, and Volume of DoD
AE Contract Awards Ratings
Adjectival Rating Description
Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.
Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the synopsis and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.
TABLE 2
Past Performance Relevancy Ratings
Rating Description
Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Neutral No relevant past performance information is available.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .