Attachment B - Prior Experience Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 756 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GENERATOR MAINTENANCE AND ANNUAL LOAD BANK/ TESTING Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C25525Q0106
About this file
This is a Prior Experience Questionnaire (Attachment B) for solicitation number 36C25525Q0106 for Generator Maintenance Service at EKHCS, issued by the VA Network Contracting Office (NCO) 15 in Leavenworth, KS.
The questionnaire requires respondents to provide detailed past performance information about offerors, using a rating scale from Excellent to Unsatisfactory. It contains 14 questions covering three main areas: Quality of Service, Business Relations, and Customer Satisfaction. Questions assess factors such as contract compliance, timeliness, technical accuracy, customer service quality, management responsiveness, communication effectiveness, billing accuracy, flexibility, problem-solving capabilities, and overall customer satisfaction. Completed questionnaires must be submitted to Contract Specialist Hubert Scipio by email by the proposal due date specified on Standard Form 1449. The document emphasizes that responses will be treated as source selection sensitive information and that the government bears no responsibility for ensuring questionnaires are properly received.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attchement C Copy of LVN and TOP Eqip List Generator.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Questions and Answers 11 Feb 25.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment A- Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| 36C25525Q0106-Generator Maintenance-EKHCS.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT B
PRIOR EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NUMBER — 36C25525Q0106 Generator Maintenance Service, EKHCS
I. Please complete this questionnaire. For assistance with this form or to request an electronic copy, please notify the contract specialist listed at the address below. Handwritten responses will be accepted. If you need more space than provided, please attach additional pages or write on the back. Please include only relevant information. Responses will be treated as source selection sensitive information. Please submit this information on or before the proposal due date as stated on the front of the Standard Form 1449.
Return the completed questionnaire by email to the following address:
Network Contracting Office (NCO) 15
ATTN: Hubert Scipio 3450 South 4 th Street Trafficway
Leavenworth, KS 66048
Telephone:(913) 946-1957 E-mail:hubert.scipio@va.gov
II. EXPLANATION OF CODES:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
E EXCELLENT — Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
G GOOD — Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the
Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A ACCEPTABLE — Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL — Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY — Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE — Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to the effort assessed.
NAME OF RESPONDENT _________________________________________________
TITLE/POSITION ________________________________________________________
SIGNATURE ____________________________________________________________
THE FOLLOWING IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND PRIOR EXPERIENCE:
PRIOR EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE
RFP NUMBER: 36C25525Q0106 Generator Maintenance Service TITLE: Generator Maintenance Service SECTION I: OFFERORS SHALL COMPLETE requested information, and in turn, provide the questionnaire to the appropriate Respondent for each source of Past Performance Information mentioned in its Offer. The Respondent must have significant familiarity with the selected contract or subcontract, in order to provide informed answers and comments about various aspects of the past performance.
NAME OF OFFEROR BEING VALUATED_________________________________________
COMPANY NAME OF PRIOR EXPERIENCE SOURCE ____________________________
CONTRACT NUMBER and DATES OF SERVICE FOR WHICH PRIOR EXPERIENCE
INFORMATION IS BEING PROVIDED ___________________ _________________
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE ____________________________________________________
SECTION II: RESPONDENT(S) SHALL COMPLETE the requested information concerning the past performance of the above named Offeror relative to the contract effort stated. Respondent shall return the completed form directly to the Contract Specialist by email to hubert.scipio @va.gov
1. Did the contractor comply with all contract requirements?
Yes___ No___
Comments: ______________________________________________________________
2. With regard to timeliness of performance, were turnaround times of the contract met (i.e. completion of administrative requirements, task orders, milestones, and production and delivery requirements?
Yes ___ No___
Comments: ______________________________________________________________
3. Was the contractor's work found to be accurate and technically/clinically excellent?
Yes___ No____
Comments: ______________________________________________________________
4. How would you rate the quality of the contractor's end products furnished under this contract?
______Excellent _____Good ___Acceptable ____Marginal ____Unsatisfactory
Comments: ______________________________________________________________
5. How would you rate the quality of the contractor's customer service furnished under this contract?
______Excellent _____Good ___ Acceptable ____ Marginal ____Unsatisfactory
Comments: ______________________________________________________________
(B) BUSINESS RELATIONS
6. Was contract Management efficient and responsive?
___Always ___Most of the time ___Sometimes ___Never
Comments: ______________________________________________________________
7. Did the contractor exhibit reasonable, cooperative behavior and effective communication(s)?
___Always ___Most of the time ___Sometimes ___Never
Comments: ______________________________________________________________
8. How would you rate the contractors billing timeliness and accuracy?
______Excellent _____Good ___ Acceptable ____ Marginal ____Unsatisfactory
Comments: ______________________________________________________________
ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS: Place an “X” in the appropriate box next to the letter for each item on the questionnaire. Narrative statements are vital. Please provide a supporting narrative for each area.
Attach additional pages if there is insufficient space in the comment space.
(A). QUALITY OF SERVICE
9. Was the contractor flexible?
___Always ___Most of the time ___Sometimes ___Never
Comments: ______________________________________________________________
10. Did the contractor recommend effective solutions to problems?
___Always ___Most of the time ___Sometimes ___Never
Comments: ______________________________________________________________
11. Did the contractor exhibit a business-like concern for the interests of your Agency or Business:
___Always ___Most of the time ___Sometimes ___Never
Comments: ______________________________________________________________
(C) CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
12. How would you rate the contractor on the basis of customer (end-user) satisfaction?
_____Excellent ___Good ___Acceptable ____ Marginal ____Unsatisfactory
Comments: ______________________________________________________________
13. Would you select this firm again?
____Yes ____No
Comments: ______________________________________________________________
14. How would you rate the contractors timeliness in responding to phone calls and e-mails?
______Excellent _____Good ___ Acceptable ____ Marginal ____Unsatisfactory
End of Section II
THE COMPLETED PRIOR EXPERIENCE REFERENCES MUST REACH THE CONTRACTING
OFFICE BY THE DATE AND TIME OFFERS ARE DUE. THE GOVERNMENT BEARS NO
RESPONSIBILITY TO ASSURE QUESTIONNAIRES ARE PROPERLY RECEIVED.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .